Wunderkind said:
Scott27 is gonna hate me for saying it. But I am quite sure the 6-Series is going to be a repeat of the 5-Series GT (a failure).
6-series a sales failure? Are you serious? Also: 5er GT is not a failure - perhaps in some markets, but in some it's a hit. So in general the car works. therefore the 3er GT is coming ... Which I guess will be much more successful since the shape will be sportier, the car will be cheaper, and attractive lower-end diesel engines will be offered 8the ones that are missing in 5er GT - preventing the car to sell in much higher volumes in some European markets; but it seems BMW will push 3er GT there ...). Mind 3er GT will be more a "5er hatchback" - just like 5er GT is more a "7er hatchback" in character.
Back to 6er ...
Sure eg. 6er GC will sell in lower volumes than eg. A7 or CLS if priced much higher. Like eg. Pananera. Would you call that a sales failure?
IMO 6er GC can eat quite much into SWB 7er sales in some markets - where 7er is bought as a status statement. While 6er GC can make an even greater statement: it's lower, sportier, more a true BMW (sporty "sedan"), and I expect the price to be quite similar to SWB 7er. And sure some 6er coupe prospects will also definitely opt for GC ... or later for 6er Shooting Brake ("6er GT"?). So, 6er is a family ... the customers split among varoious models. While eg. Panamera, CLS & A7 are still offered in a single model only ... while new ones are coming (CLS SB, A7 cabrio, Panamera cabrio?).
Regarding 6er coupe & cabrio demand: despite worse economy condition then in the times E63/4 6er was launched, the demand for F12/3 is higher then it was for E63/4 at launch.
SKYSONY said:
As far as I remember, you are a marketing guy, the answer should be pretty obvious. Nowadays, design is the key factor inevery car purchase. I wouldn´t buy a car, no matter how good it drives, if I don´t find it beautiful.
Is it really? What "beautiful" means anyway? For the "Bangled" generation of BMW the general opinion was the cars were "ugly" - but they were still in demand. BMW even managed to surpass MB in sales worldwide in those times.
Is it enough for premium car to be beautiful? Or it also it's design has to be a bit interesting & intriguing, even controversial? Does its design have to make a statement? What's that added value of design people are willing to pay for? Sure hardly anyone would buy a car that he / she doesn't find at least a bit appealing ... but what's the thing a customer is willing to pay more when it comes to design? Does design - as added value - really matters so much? Does it at all?
I'm not talking about design as key factor in the car purchase decisions making (appealing vs unappealing) ... but about differentiation factor between regular & premium. About design as added value for the customer - something that a customer is ready to pay extra money for. Is it really happening? People paying extra for car designs? Or automotive industry still does not depend so much on design / styling so much?
Bangle & BMW tried to offer something different, something new, something people would pay more for. But did they?