Looking at the rear photo, notice how it says CL63 AMG, not S63 AMG...

I don't understand this facelift. Why didn't MB encorporate some of the new design language into the CL?
The SLS and SB concept grill would have looked great on this model. Then they took out the arch on the front fender. This was actually the best executed front wheel arch on a Benz, and they scrap it???
The rear lights look dull and unispired. The additional lights on the trunk lid look stupid. I love the sculpted bumper on the SB concept. Yet the CL gets the most boring bumper you could imagine.
The headlight shape on the CL was fine. simple, nice shape. Yet it appears they've farted around with this and put some useless styling quirk in.
As a 12 year MB veteran, I give this a big fat F.
IMO, I think they could have just updated the headlamps and taillamps, and it would have done just as well.
Ho Hum ... for now at least :|![]()
I think because it is so late after the S-class that there is really no WOW factor. Especially considering that it will be getting similar details like the S-class. Well except for the rear.

The upfront, T square derived front design is totally at odds with the curvaceous rear. How much chrome do MB need to use, honestly? Every panel of that car is glitzed in chrome.

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.