slicknick
Driving Dynamics Pro
- Messages
- 3,564
Might as well not call it the 63 AMG anymore then?4.0. Same as E63 s
Might as well not call it the 63 AMG anymore then?4.0. Same as E63 s
the smaller 4litre engine is actually more capable than the old 5.5I wish they kept the 5.5 for the S and SL family.
the smaller 4litre engine is actually more capable than the old 5.5
Branding...The 6.3 carries history. Here is something that will blow your mind. The M156 which started this whole 63 revival was not a 6.3 liter either...
a render or the real deal?
If w222 had a 7 year cycle, we would have seen w223 mule now, because the first 222 mule we saw in February 2010Guessing this will have an April reveal, but what is going to happen with the next generation? Will this run just 3 years or 4 years for a total life-cycle of 8 years?
I had to glance a second time, as I had initially read that as "terribly sexist" and then wondered the S-Class was somehow more sexist than 7er. (And no I do not have far-farsightedness lol)
I think we normally start seeing prototypes of the next generation about 6 months after the face lift version of the current car is launched.If w222 had a 7 year cycle, we would have seen w223 mule now, because the first 222 mule we saw in February 2010![]()
front- and rearbumper are completely wrong: it's a render.a render or the real deal?
If w222 had a 7 year cycle, we would have seen w223 mule now, because the first 222 mule we saw in February 2010![]()
Judging by the amount of new technology put into the new FL w222, I won't be surprised if it goes for the 8 years lifespan.If w222 had a 7 year cycle, we would have seen w223 mule now, because the first 222 mule we saw in February 2010![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.