Have you seen it in person with/without camouflage,and if you seen without camouflage how so?![]()
![]()
As I've mentioned before, the iX and the EQS have almost the exact same shape. BMW used a lot more styling tricks to stop their EV SUV from looking like a van. The EQS camo is hiding some of the body sculpting but it's not going to raise your pulse. I've seen it person and it is instantly more palatable than the EQS...although the EQE is my current favorite.
I think these are going to sell well although the interior has some of the same material pitfalls as the EQS.
It does say Mercedes-EQ, however. People on this forum are going to have an agonizing ~6 years until these EVA2 vehicles are done lol.
Have you seen it in person with/without camouflage,and if you seen without camouflage how so?
How is Mercedes going to build all these new vehicles with no chips?
M
I really don't understand what MB is doing with these EQ cars. They are some of the worst looking cars I've seen in recent history. Other manufacturers are showing that efficiency and design in the BEV era work: Tesla, Audi, Porsche, Polestar, even some Chinese. As an MB fan, it's unbelievable that MB is staying the course in EQ design..Looks like a blown up A-Class. Yuck ?.
I really don't understand what MB is doing with these EQ cars. They are some of the worst looking cars I've seen in recent history. Other manufacturers are showing that efficiency and design in the BEV era work: Tesla, Audi, Porsche, Polestar, even some Chinese. As an MB fan, it's unbelievable that MB is staying the course in EQ design..
Except for the looks, the EQS has received very positive responses from the press with the way it drives, especially its low noise levels, ride, comfort and agility and the look of the interior.I find the EQ SUVs' relatively "digestable". It's the direction that M-B has taken with the low ride height EQ sedans that perplexes and alienates. They are simply very odd looking automobiles. For me purely hypothetical of course, but the EQ sedans are placed at the very bottom of my list in their respective segments. They simply do not appear to offer anything that is overwhelmingly compelling, whether it be design, craftsmanship, packaging, fit/finish/materials, etc. I do think that the Hyperscreen is kind of cool. But that's really not enough. They're "neither here nor there" automobiles.
When was the last time, Rolf, you read negative responses from the "press", when a new car was introduced? I really can't remember.Except for the looks, the EQS has received very positive responses from the press with the way it drives, especially its low noise levels, ride, comfort and agility and the look of the interior.
When was the last time, Rolf, you read negative responses from the "press", when a new car was introduced? I really can't remember.
I really don't understand what MB is doing with these EQ cars. They are some of the worst looking cars I've seen in recent history. Other manufacturers are showing that efficiency and design in the BEV era work: Tesla, Audi, Porsche, Polestar, even some Chinese. As an MB fan, it's unbelievable that MB is staying the course in EQ design..
It's down right heartbreaking. Everyone else is coming up with EVs that look better than their ICE lineup or just good looking EVs period and Mercedes-Benz of all people can't make a good looking EV. It's inexplicably awful.
M
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.