- Messages
- 7,139
I like it, but also don't like it. That is the worst front end flub since the 1-Series. How characterless, soulless, cheap, anti-arresting, anti-present, and generically meek and moderate for a car like a Range Rover.
It does have an air of "Ford Friendliness" to it that makes SUV's look designed solely for Mothers with Soccer kids, but not enough to ruin it. The rear I'm also not sure about. Looks both boxy and then trying to be soft with those overdesigned weirdly bent taillights.
Finally, the gills on the door add some welcome "pizzazz" to the side profile, but come off somehow a little crude and unfinished/busy looking.
Those criticisms aside, I think it looks pretty good and appropriate for a Range. I don't ind it at all, and if I was in the market, it would be a definite contender, BUT, that weak and "should be on an LR2" front may be a deal breaker.
It does have an air of "Ford Friendliness" to it that makes SUV's look designed solely for Mothers with Soccer kids, but not enough to ruin it. The rear I'm also not sure about. Looks both boxy and then trying to be soft with those overdesigned weirdly bent taillights.
Finally, the gills on the door add some welcome "pizzazz" to the side profile, but come off somehow a little crude and unfinished/busy looking.
Those criticisms aside, I think it looks pretty good and appropriate for a Range. I don't ind it at all, and if I was in the market, it would be a definite contender, BUT, that weak and "should be on an LR2" front may be a deal breaker.