Despite the fact that some here (especially one) post nonsense figures, the sample is still not a real reflection, nor is it consistent or competitive, since the most "affordable" versions of the G70 are missing or are just being launched there.Which one is selling the most in China, the G70 7-series or the W223 S-class?
What are you laughing at? explain yourself
Two posts above I answered you about the origin of these figures and why according to the information I think they would be a bit out of context, the boy in reference laughs because he has some deep problem.Because BMW’s radical design to please the Chinese market sure is paying off…
I think you missed the point.Ok then. Let's compare the true first EVs from BMW and Tesla
Both i3 and Model S came in the same timeline (around 2014).
And I don't mean to compare the cars. I mean , to compare the EV development.
I think I do. BMW does NOT give a crap about EVs. Still...I think you missed the point.
M
Interesting considering all the compromises they’re making and the money being spent on them. Just because they’re not good at it doesn’t mean they don’t care.I think I do. BMW does NOT give a crap about EVs. Still...
Interesting considering all the compromises they’re making and the money being spent on them. Just because they’re not good at it doesn’t mean they don’t care.
M
I'm most interested to know how BMW's EV strategy is just so out of step with MB and Audi? I'm not saying it's worse or wrong, I'm just trying to understand how the strategic implementation has been so different.
Australia definitely couldn't accommodate an EV only automotive landscape let along the likes of many countries in Asia, South America and Africa.
BMW's EV only platform is a year and a half away isn't it?
Very informative. Thank you for your insight.My own speculative take from placing bits and pieces from the news and interviews over the last 10 years as a disappointed BMW fan and an early EV enthusiast -
In 2012, BMW jumped into the EV pool early with the i stuff, way before most other legacy manufacturers. Unfortunately and predictably, that wasn't a big sales success. But instead of recognizing that, that was because of product market/time misfit with i3, i8, they concluded "no one wants EVs".
The backlash was that they completely stopped investing in i (and hence EVs). And pushed out the exec(s) that believed in EVs and promoted ones that don't. For them, EVs were just a passing fad that you had to pay lip service to satisfy regulators/score ESG brownie points, so they came up BEV/ICEV in one strategy. But then came was success of Tesla, there was a lot of shareholder pressure to rush out EV models, and only way to do that in short order was to double down on this BEV/ICEV in one strategy.
Why do people keep saying this? These are tiny insignificant markets for BMW. This is BMW group sales in 2022 -
![]()
Out of the 2.4M cars BMW sold in 2022, "Other markets" accounted for < 50k. That is just 2%! Even Asia - (China, SKorea, Japan) is ~100k (4%). Why will you decide your product strategy based on what 2% wants?
And one other point about Australia specifically - in the first 4 months of this year, Tesla sold ~2x as many cars as BMW/Merc - 14k vs 7k/8k (source), so, so much for Australia being a reason for to continue making ICEV.
Very informative. Thank you for your insight.
Australia is insignificant yes, but are we reading the same table? Asia accounts for 1million sales.
I should have been clearer, I meant Asia excluding China, SKorea and Japan all of which are favorable markets for EVs (maybe not Japan).
So out of the total 1M for Asia, ~800k is China, 80k is S.Korea and Japan is ~30k, leaving ~ 100k for rest of Asia.
Makes sense. ICE dependant markets are a drop in the ocean it seems.
The Japanese really dislike BMW lol.
The Japanese really dislike BMW lol.
The B in the BRICS
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.