SLK/SLC-Class (R172) [Official] Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172)


The Mercedes-Benz R172 is the third generation SLK-Class (SLC-Class) launched in 2011. It is the successor to the R171. Production: 2011–2020.
New wheels for the SLC. :)

12402071_1160636157298465_5878942289175328749_o.webp


12402161_1160636160631798_7436648243238195598_o.webp


12402176_1160636327298448_3978330471573151983_o.webp


12419058_1160636147298466_213366274138298848_o.webp


12419084_1160636233965124_6293273259501779080_o.webp


12471719_1160636287298452_4683694567602933831_o.webp


http:///
 
I think the facelift/change is a success, I just wish they had gone with SLC450 and left room for a true AMG model later when the new I6s arrive.

M
 
Actually I kinda like the SLC 43 in that red colour. I think I like the styling of the SLC better than the updated SL, especially the rear.
 
Latest info translated from MB Passion. :)

The Mercedes-Benz SLK 180: the technical data of the smallest engine


035d75baa0a2046b92d6f5143013bbf2.webp


The Mercedes-Benz SLC comes with different engines, amongst others as an SLC 180 with the M274 (E16DELA) engine and 156 hp (226 km / h VMax, 7.9 seconds to 100 km / h and 1,595 cc). Therefore we want to take a look at the specifications, weights and dimensions.
80b4e7c74a7f50a60924c1ec01c02106.webp

SLC 180: 156 hp - 226 km / h VMax

The SLC 180 rolls on 205 / 55 R16 91V tires (all around) off the line, and the combined fuel consumption according to factory specifications comes to 5.8-5.6 liters per 100 km (134-127g / km CO2 ), while the tank holds - in addition to an 8 liter reserve - a total of 60 liters. The curb weight of the SLC 180 is 1435 kg, with a 315 kg payload thus yielding a gross vehicle weight of 1,750 kg.

0465bb20fec19daa0dde7ea53fcd916c.webp


The M274 engine (E16DELA), mounted longitudinally over the front axle, has 4 cylinders, 1,595 cc displacement and 156 hp (115 kW) at 5,300 rev / min. Its rated torque is 250 Nm (at 1,200 to 4,000 rpm), the cut-off speed is reached at 6,500 rpm (compression ratio 10.3:1). The exterior noise when stopped is given with 75 dBA, and the interior noise at 71 dBA. The drag coefficient of the SLK 180 is 0.31 (1.98 m2 geometric area, drag area 0.61 m2).

41ab89812036b7ed808103ab68a0a415.webp


Information about transmission and spread

The gearbox has a spread of 6:03, and the rear ratio is 3.07. The ratios 1 to 7 are 4.75, 2.46 1.62, 1.24 1.00 0.79 and the reverse gear at exactly 4:47. The steering - with electro-hydraulic power assist - has a ratio (center position) of 15.50.
a417deeab6c4e8212e3d3fdb5b144c0f.webp


Dimensions

The vehicle length of the SLC 180 is 4,133 mm, the height with an open tailgate comes to 1,795 - and closed to 1,301 mm. The width of the open roadster is 1,810 mm (with front door opened to 2,904 mm), the overall width with mirrors to 2006, and with folded mirrors to 1,854 mm. Its wheelbase is 2430 mm, and the turning circle is 10.52 m. The luggage compartment volume - open - is 225 liters, otherwise 335 liters. The effective headroom in the driver's seat has a maximum of 993 mm.

2d08daddd948a3bdc7252176257fb782.webp


Translated from this MB Passion article:

http:///2016/01/der-mercedes-benz-slc-angaben-zu-masse-und-gewicht-r172/
 
Can understand why they dropped out the SLK350 as the new smaller engined SLC300 is nearly as fast, 5.8sec compared to 5.6sec in 0-100km/h and using much less fuel.
 
Mercedes-AMG SLC43 Gets Official Presentation Clip, Still Feels Wrong with No V8
6d81bae0a3a429761500179aaf7f8e0f.webp

Just as most of us were beginning to shop for last Christmas, the new Mercedes-Benz SLC came along, providing a much-needed update to the aging SLK roadster and giving it a new name at the same time.

As facelifts go, the one suffered by the SLK can be considered as a major one, with the front end suffering most of the changes while the rear and the interior were trailing closely behind. Yet what hurt the most was the across-the-range engine downsizing, starting with the SLC180 that uses a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine and culminating with the AMG version.

The new sports version wears the somewhat confusing nomenclature of SLC43, with the numeric part of that name seemingly chose at random as it can’t really be linked to anything. The A-Class has less power and a smaller engine, and yet it’s called AMG A45, while the rest of the Affalterbach models get the classic 63 or 65 callsigns.

But if that were the only problem, we’d be over it in no time. No, the real issue lies with what’s actually under the hood. Mercedes-AMG can make all the glitzy presentation clips it wants, we’re still not ready to get over the fact that its new smallest roadster only uses a 3.0-liter V6 engine with 367 hp.

We’re not saying that’s not plenty of power or that it’s not worthy of an AMG model - even though the rest of the cars that use this engine aren’t full-blown AMG models but members of the newly formed AMG Sport sub-brand (which is about to get canned, apparently - more on that here). It’s the idea.

When you opt for a Mercedes-AMG SLC, you don’t just buy an AMG car, you buy a small roadster with a ridiculous V8 engine. The whole car is preposterous, and that’s the point. You don’t want one that makes more sense, that’s more affordable or more economical, you want the V8 one.

But that’s where we’re headed. Mercedes-AMG needs to cut down on emissions and fuel consumption, and the SLC drew the short stick and was the first to suffer the consequences. Oh, well, they could have used a dumbed-down version of the new 4.0-liter V8 engine, but they probably know better. And since the two-liter four-cylinder unit in the AMG A45 sounds so damn good, here’s to hoping the V6 will be at least just as obnoxious.

One thing is certain: the new Mercedes-AMG SLC43 is definitely helped by the design changes, and that’s plain to see in the clip below. What we’re still waiting for is to hear the sound the V6 makes on the SLC, and that’s something this clip, unfortunately, doesn’t clarify for us.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Mercedes-AMG SLC43 Gets Official Presentation Clip, Still Feels Wrong with No V8
6d81bae0a3a429761500179aaf7f8e0f.webp

Just as most of us were beginning to shop for last Christmas, the new Mercedes-Benz SLC came along, providing a much-needed update to the aging SLK roadster and giving it a new name at the same time.

As facelifts go, the one suffered by the SLK can be considered as a major one, with the front end suffering most of the changes while the rear and the interior were trailing closely behind. Yet what hurt the most was the across-the-range engine downsizing, starting with the SLC180 that uses a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine and culminating with the AMG version.

The new sports version wears the somewhat confusing nomenclature of SLC43, with the numeric part of that name seemingly chose at random as it can’t really be linked to anything. The A-Class has less power and a smaller engine, and yet it’s called AMG A45, while the rest of the Affalterbach models get the classic 63 or 65 callsigns.

But if that were the only problem, we’d be over it in no time. No, the real issue lies with what’s actually under the hood. Mercedes-AMG can make all the glitzy presentation clips it wants, we’re still not ready to get over the fact that its new smallest roadster only uses a 3.0-liter V6 engine with 367 hp.

We’re not saying that’s not plenty of power or that it’s not worthy of an AMG model - even though the rest of the cars that use this engine aren’t full-blown AMG models but members of the newly formed AMG Sport sub-brand (which is about to get canned, apparently - more on that here). It’s the idea.

When you opt for a Mercedes-AMG SLC, you don’t just buy an AMG car, you buy a small roadster with a ridiculous V8 engine. The whole car is preposterous, and that’s the point. You don’t want one that makes more sense, that’s more affordable or more economical, you want the V8 one.

But that’s where we’re headed. Mercedes-AMG needs to cut down on emissions and fuel consumption, and the SLC drew the short stick and was the first to suffer the consequences. Oh, well, they could have used a dumbed-down version of the new 4.0-liter V8 engine, but they probably know better. And since the two-liter four-cylinder unit in the AMG A45 sounds so damn good, here’s to hoping the V6 will be at least just as obnoxious.

One thing is certain: the new Mercedes-AMG SLC43 is definitely helped by the design changes, and that’s plain to see in the clip below. What we’re still waiting for is to hear the sound the V6 makes on the SLC, and that’s something this clip, unfortunately, doesn’t clarify for us.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The A45 AMG DOES have more power. 381hp.
 
I think this new AMG 43 naming is a load of bollocks and I am sure so many Merc fans around the world must be disappointed cause the SLK55 had a great thumping V8 engine that totally annilates this 3,0ltr V6 for character and refinement and now it's been replaced by a smaller engine that is 40kw less powerful and without the noise of the wonderful V8.
 
I think this new AMG 43 naming is a load of bollocks and I am sure so many Merc fans around the world must be disappointed cause the SLK55 had a great thumping V8 engine that totally annilates this 3,0ltr V6 for character and refinement and now it's been replaced by a smaller engine that is 40kw less powerful and without the noise of the wonderful V8.

The SLK55 AMG has not been replaced by the AMG 43. It just hasn't been replaced at all. The AMG 43 is a new line of "semi-AMG" models, a bit like Audi's "S" models and BMW's "M Performance" range.


I agree about the stupid name for the AMG 43 models. I can only assume Dr Z had popped out to use the bathroom when this decision was made, as I cannot believe he would let it happen on his watch.
 
Mercedes SLC pricing announced for UK

Following its introduction at the Detroit Auto Show, the Mercedes-Benz SLC (SLK facelift) has arrived in UK where it carries a starting price of £30,495.

The cheapest SLC money can buy in UK is the base SLC 200 Sport which kicks off at £30,495 for the six-speed manual and from £31,980 if you go for the optional nine-speed automatic transmission. The model comes equipped with halogen headlights featuring LED daytime running lights. Go for the automatic model and you will also benefit from a sports exhaust system. Other standard goodies include remote trunk release, LED taillights, 17-inch alloy wheels, headlamp assist, sports pedals, along with safety kit like Active Brake Assist, Active Bonnet, and Attention Assist.

At an additional cost, Mercedes is offering adaptive LED headlights for £1,150 and you can also order the optional Keyless Go package that will set you back an extra £765. The SLC Sport can be had with 18-inch five-twin spoke alloys for an additional £995, whereas the SLC AMG Line gets standard 18-inch AMG multi-spoke alloys.

The SLC 200 is powered by a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine with 184 horsepower (135 kW). The same engine is also available in the AMG Line- and auto-only SLC 300 (from £39,385) where it pushes out 245 hp (180 kW). If you would rather have a turbodiesel engine, the auto-only SLC 250d (from £32,995 Sport / £36,995 AMG Line) with its 2.1-liter motor has 204 hp (150 kW).

The cream of the crop is obviously the SLC 43 with a biturbo 3.0-liter V6 engine 367 hp and 520 Nm (384 lb-ft) of torque. It sprints to 62 miles per hour (100 kilometers per hour) in 4.7 seconds and can hit an electronically-limited top speed of 155 mph (250 kph). The auto-only flagship version costs £46,355 and Mercedes UK points out it is way cheaper than the defunct SLK 55 AMG which was available for £55,350.

The Mercedes SLC is now available on order in UK, so deliveries should start in the following months.

Source: Mercedes-Benz UK
 
The cream of the crop is obviously the SLC 43 with a biturbo 3.0-liter V6 engine 367 hp and 520 Nm (384 lb-ft) of torque. It sprints to 62 miles per hour (100 kilometers per hour) in 4.7 seconds and can hit an electronically-limited top speed of 155 mph (250 kph). The auto-only flagship version costs £46,355 and Mercedes UK points out it is way cheaper than the defunct SLK 55 AMG which was available for £55,350.

I should think so considering it's not even a proper AMG or even a replacement for the 55 AMG. Why do companies write this BS? Do they think people are stupid?
 
I should think so considering it's not even a proper AMG or even a replacement for the 55 AMG. Why do companies write this BS? Do they think people are stupid?
It's marketing BS, Betty. Marketing-people often think like politicians and like politicians, they think the average voter/customer is stupid. I don't even bother anymore.
 
I for one would be ok with the "43" badge if brought along a new engine, say a 400hp I6. That would be reason to change up the naming convention and model designation, but this non hand built V6 is not a true AMG and I'll say again this should have been a SLC450 AMG Sport. I would have loved to sit in on the marketing meeting when they came up with this crap.

M
 
So confusing. They just introduced the "450 sport" language and then change it. Really shows a lack of consensus on Mercedes' part, and extremely frustrating for us sales folk who already get blank stares from customers trying to understand the alphabet soup of badging and numbers. In just 3 years the C will go from having a C400 to a C450 to a C43, and all essentially the same car, with same displacement engine.

My thoughts were to drop the numbers all together and just have the model. If a car has an upgrade over the base engine, then note that either behind the front wheel well or trunk lid. ex; (3.0 liter biturbo, or Bi-turbo V6)
 
I don't see what was wrong with the AMG Sport label. That was perfect IMO. The C450 was perfect for that IMO. SLC450, GLC450, C450 Coupe and so on. E450 with 400hp would have been perfect too. So I'm not on board with this calling everything a real AMG (when it isn't) nonsense either. Yeah the C400 should have never been in the U.S. market, it should have been the C450 AMG Sport from day one. I don't get why they changed to this strategy other than to make glowing sales press releases because now "AMG" sales are going to explode because of the C450, GLE450 etc are now added to the AMG sales totals.

M
 
I don't see what was wrong with the AMG Sport label. That was perfect IMO. The C450 was perfect for that IMO. SLC450, GLC450, C450 Coupe and so on. E450 with 400hp would have been perfect too. So I'm not on board with this calling everything a real AMG (when it isn't) nonsense either. Yeah the C400 should have never been in the U.S. market, it should have been the C450 AMG Sport from day one. I don't get why they changed to this strategy other than to make glowing sales press releases because now "AMG" sales are going to explode because of the C450, GLE450 etc are now added to the AMG sales totals.


M

IMO having a 2 digit moniker is needed even if they are not true AMG's, in order to differentiate them from standard models, for example, the impact of saying C43 compared with saying C450 AMG Sport is quite obvious, I actually thought the 450 moniker never made sense, even though the new 43 one is even more bonkers....what was wrong with AMG C40, why 43?, I guess we'll never know.
 

Mercedes-Benz

Mercedes-Benz Group AG is headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany. Established in 1926, Mercedes-Benz Group produces consumer luxury vehicles and light commercial vehicles badged as Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-AMG, and Mercedes-Maybach. Its origin lies in Daimler-Motoren-Gesellschaft's 1901 Mercedes and Carl Benz's 1886 Benz Patent-Motorwagen, which is widely regarded as the first internal combustion engine in a self-propelled automobile. The slogan for the brand is "the best or nothing".
Official website: Mercedes-Benz (Global), Mercedes-Benz (USA)

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top