Never said this. They just won't offer a warranty longer than the required by the regulations. In Europe it is two years.
But the manufacturers can compensate this with higher prices of the cars. Every manufacturer knows exacly how much each additional year costs and just adds it to the price. When the conditions are the same for everybody the longer warranty is not a problem.In Norway consumer law says 5 years. Manufacturers all give 5 years, Hyundai and Kia for a time offered 7 but it's back to5.
But the manufacturers can compensate this with higher prices of the cars. Every manufacturer knows exacly how much each additional year costs and just adds it to the price. When the conditions are the same for everybody the longer warranty is not a problem.
Can you give us some price without the taxes, so that we can compare it to a German price without the 19% VAT.If you removed the one off purchase tax cars in Norway aren't any more expensive than cars in other European countries.
It will definitely happen.From the (solely) online footage I've heard so far, I figure that the 296 sounds somewhat better. That reminds me, shouldn't we be having a good old-fashioned shoot-out in the Internal Combustion section between these two?
Agree... on the other hand, McLaren had a chance to "establish" the Artura before by handing it over to the press (it's been presented a long time ago now), yet they didn't. Problems ?In a way I feel bad for the folks in McLaren. The 296 pretty stole any thunder the Artura had.
The proof of the pudding will be in the eating.In a way I feel bad for the folks in McLaren. The 296 pretty stole any thunder the Artura had.
I am not really sure that's true. The Artura is a replacement for the 570S and is gonna be a fair bit cheaper than the Ferrari. Also I think the Artura is a lot better looking and better designed as well. We'll see how they drive but Ferrari haven't produced a car that drove better than any Mclaren since the 458, so I wouldn't bet on Ferrari pulling ahead there. Apart from the usual reasons (wanting to own a Ferrari), objectively, I don't see why you would go for the 296 instead of the Artura. Yeah, slightly faster in a straight line - but since you can just buy an electric sedan that's faster than either, that fact is becoming less relevant by the second.In a way I feel bad for the folks in McLaren. The 296 pretty stole any thunder the Artura had.
I am not really sure that's true. The Artura is a replacement for the 570S and is gonna be a fair bit cheaper than the Ferrari. Also I think the Artura is a lot better looking and better designed as well. We'll see how they drive but Ferrari haven't produced a car that drove better than any Mclaren since the 458, so I wouldn't bet on Ferrari pulling ahead there. Apart from the usual reasons (wanting to own a Ferrari), objectively, I don't see why you would go for the 296 instead of the Artura. Yeah, slightly faster in a straight line - but since you can just buy an electric sedan that's faster than either, that fact is becoming less relevant by the second.
That said, a new mid engined Ferrari will probably always produce more excitement than a new entry level Mclaren - and Mclaren aren't known to produce the most exciting and passionate cars ever anyway - so there is an argument to be had there. Still, even if that is true, the arguments that because of the 296 - which is positioned higher than the Artura anyway - the car is dead on arrival, are rather missing the mark.
Excellent point. I just had a peek at the first page of this thread and the car was unveiled in February!Anybody knows what's going on with this car ? Still no press drive. I thought it was expected to occur in Spring. Again the semiconductors effect (maybe a small manufacturer like McLaren would be more severily hit by this) ?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.