Mr. Mercedes
Premium
Currently w212 is almost wrong car to a Sport sedan segment, this is why it loosing nearly all comparison tests. There is nothing sporty about E class other then AMG bumpers, is has worst handling, performance, fuel economy, worst sterring feedback and no driving experience. Mercedes even refused to participate in latest MotorTrend magazine Sport sedan comparison, because they know that E class will loose. When it comes to luxury is comfortble but it doesn't offer $50000+ feel to it. W212 sales is not a success compared to w211, Mercedes just made it look better by renaming CLK as E class. F10 is a success vs E60, it help BMW increase their sales by over 1000 cars every month in US alone, F10 maybe doesn't have sterring feel of E60 because of electric sterring, but rewards you with better porformace and 8mpg improvement over 528 E60. Hopefully Mercedes will fix all w212 mistakes with a faselift, and make E class a leader in segment just like they do with S class by havining everyone chasing them..
What sweeping statements and generalisations. BMW have been receiving critiscim about their heavy and inert steering feel for a few years now down here in OZ and now the fact that they just don't seem to ride and handle as well as they should without a plethora of suspensions options. Conversely MB have garnered consistent praise for their steering systems and well judged ride and handling compromise in standard guise. Many reviews have stated that it seems like the C-class was made for Australian roads and the FL C has consistently beaten the NEW 3-series in numerous comparisons as has the E over the 5.
Interestingly the E sells about 350 units a month while the 5 manages only about 170. The E has over 50% of the midsixed luxury sedan market. The C has for the first time in about 3 years just last month been beaten by the 3-series by about 100 units. This is an incredible outcome for the C-class which used to be outsold by the 3, 3 to 1.
KA I know exactly what you mean about the W212 sports suspension seeming harsh over rough surfaces. Odly enough though, I for the first time in 2 years got to sit in the back of our car while driven over some pretty questionable surfaces. It was actually perfectly comfortable, QUIET and smooth back there. It makes me think the problem is isolated to the front end, with less than optimally calibrated dampeners and road noise isolation.
Thankfully also, our E has remained as solid as a brick shit**** with nary a rattle or squeak, despite what feels like an overtly harsh ride on rough roads when in the driver or passengers seat.
In terms of design, I give MB about 3 years before we'll see the've got their crap together and we'll start see a truly cohesive and beautiful line up. Remember Pfeiffer still oversaw the GLK, E, CLS etc. He likely also oversaw the SL given that the design sat on ice for 2 years while production difficulties were dealt with. MB designers have stated they were forced to make the SLK look like it does because the SL design had already been signed off.