Tourbillon
Cornering Kingpin
- Messages
- 9,107
Listen to that rumble! Or maybe not!
In 10 years, they will admit that e-performance AMG models were a mistake. However, they can’t do that today that that branding underpins the AMG-ONE.This car with a 600hp V8 and no electrics would have been a proper send off. What will happen at facelift time?
If something matters to them, those of the Mercedes group should fire everyone who had to do with the development of this vehicle and the system in general that seems to not work in any of their models and they still include it but instead of improving it they make it worse .
c63 discussion starts at 50.20
The problem with Mercedes is that they never heard about the KISS principle.
Keep It Simple Stupid.
All Mercedes-AMG had to do with the W206 C63 was simply to keep the twin-turbo V8, add more power to the twin-turbo V8, harness the extra power with 4Matic and... That's about it. Nice and simple.
"The all new Mercedes-AMG C63. Still a twin-turbo V8 beast, but now with more grip".
Better late than never. They'll miss out on 2 and a half years of market share and bounce backSoon? I read that it is 2026, very late rather
Engine will probably be phased out like the VAG 1.4 twincharger
Why not? Porsche did it. 4.0 GTS purely to appease the american market that didnt want 4 cylinder cayman or boxsterCall me a cynical bastard if you want, but I'm not buying into this story.
I'm not buying this humble attitude from Mercedes-AMG: "Sorry, we messed up and we're reverting to V8, albeit hybrid on the W206 facelift. Rest assured, the W214 E63 will feature a V8 Hybrid setup".
Yeah, right... f#ck off.
Let it fade into obscurity and a depreciation black hole.They testing that shite right now lol. Thing is what do they do about the current C63?
M
Hm. From my POV it isn't completely comparable. The 2,5l turbo B4 in the 718 did sound really bad. Ok. But from performance perspective it was a win. I even think, that in some areas the performance of the 2,5 B4 718 is even better than the 4.0 NA GTS! And Porsche did not replace the Cayman S (B4 turbo). They added another option with the GTS.Why not? Porsche did it. 4.0 GTS purely to appease the american market that didnt want 4 cylinder cayman or boxster
Of course, well marked the differenceSo from Porsche their was NO admit, that the turbo B4 was a complete failure. No need as it wasn't.
Applauding in their faces would be more appropriate, perhaps this is how Mercedes learn that cheap is expensive, it is not a matter of balls but of greed to the detriment of the brand and its values.On the one hand this needs balls from AMG side and I would applaud them ... on the other hand ... what do you tell your customers, who bought that shite?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.