Thanks for posting this video I actually enjoyed it, the guy was quite thorough with his evaluation of the car even before driving it and despite the heavy sauerkraut accent he pretty much explains everything well in detail. The car certainly looks and sounds more impressive in this video than other s I have seen on the Internet. I like the way that in this video you can actually see the look and colour change of the carbon fibre on the roof, engine and also interior panels. The engine sounds good in some shots but too me there still is something missing it doesn't have that spine tingling sounds of both the E46 straight six or the E92 V8. Maybe BMW will address this in the facelift in a few years time. As a family man the M3 impresses me more and would be my choice!
I have to say, I love this new Twitter embedding function.
some interesting bits and bobs from monkey's twitter feed:
Bring it on Chris, bring it on. Many are waiting for your review!!!
Chris Harris said:Performance? Scorching. The manual will hit 100mph in nine seconds dead, the DCT in 8.7 seconds. It hardly feels turbocharged and the torque is all-consuming. Real-world, this car is miles quicker than the old E92, and the torque means the rear axle loads up much earlier in a given turn, meaning you have the sensation of controlling the car's attitude with your right foot far more than you did before. But that should come in the chassis section. Doh.
I didn't have any problem with the throttle response. In comfort the throttle is long and a little lazy - normally I like that, but the shorter sport and sport-plus settings worked better in this car for me. In the latter the speakers mess around with the intake noise some more. Compared to, say, an E46 you lose a tiny amount of instant zap, but considering it has two turbochargers, you can take several stabs mid-corner to trim your line and the response is always there. It's worth revving out to 7,500rpm too.
Colleagues have given it real flak, with the insinuation that it isn't special (dry sump, forged crank anyone?) but I'd buy this car because of the motor, not in spite of it.
Chris Harris said:The clever locking differential is essentially lifted from the F10 M5 - it can slacken itself to a fully open setting under brakes and at high speed, and then lock to 100 per cent on the exit of a turn. It's possibly the most complete unit of its type I've driven and certainly contributes to that searing turn-in and agility on the road.
Of course it's a drift expert - it's an M3. You can choose any angle and pretty much any speed. The tyres can handle quite a beating in this mode. Handy information for that morning commute
Interesting that Harris says it's worth revving to 7,500rpm when other journos said you have no incentive. I put my trust in Harris.
And this...
Dammit to hell. I must have one! Soon... but not too soon. It's all a question of timing. And wife approval.
...and the small matter of parting with a million bucks.
Dammit to hell. I must have one! Soon... but not too soon.
I have to say though, even though I'm obviously clear in my disappointment about the noise coming from the new M3 and M4, everything else about it sounds brilliant and it wouldn't put me off buying one. In fact, I fully recognise that this new M3/M4 is better suited to my situation now than the E92 would have been. It would be my daily driver along with the VW Up, so good fuel economy when you want it is very desirable. I have the V10 in my garage for when I want to wake up the neighbours.
Dammit to hell. I must have one! Soon... but not too soon. It's all a question of timing. And wife approval.
Dammit, nothing's private anymore.Maybe you could make do with an "M3" tattoo in the mean time?![]()
Dammit, nothing's private anymore.![]()
Or ask Scott for a miniature.Maybe you could make do with an "M3" tattoo in the mean time?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.