Tarek
Cornering Kingpin
No Tarek , its a Mini on steriods to be more precise.
Well considering RR shares almost everything with 7er,so it's 7er on steroids.
That's some crazy steroids for a Phantom then![]()
![]()
Not really lol.
No Tarek , its a Mini on steriods to be more precise.
That's some crazy steroids for a Phantom then![]()
![]()
Well considering RR shares almost everything with 7er,so it's 7er on steroids.
Not really lol.![]()

I don't mean to start anything but, beside a few buttons and electronic tech, the Phantom and 7 share very few components.:
Does anyone have any inside info on wen the 7er facelift is due. Also, will BMW be able to give the interior a lift to separate it from the F10 interior which in my view is a virtual copy/match of the F01.
Indeed, I too would be interested in some info regarding the F01s' L.I. facelift. I find the F01 the most visually attractive automobile in its' market segment, currently. It's the cars' proportions that make it a winner.
But, I would also applaud a somewhat more distinctive makeover of the cars' interior. Mind you, it is indeed very nice but a bit too close to that of the F10. And: Revised taillights please. I know, I'm splitting hairs here. But I find the taillights the weakest detail on the F01. They just appear so unimaginatively square to me, lacking the dynamism of the taillight scheme/graphic seen on the F10, the new F12/F13 6 series and even the 5 series GT.
But otherwise, the F01 is just fine in my eyes.
The 7er is such a disappointment. It always had the potential to be a huge success, but BMW's lazy and haphazard approach of heavily modifying the 5er just to compete in this segment, is very sad. They have been presented with yet another opportunity, and I REALLY hope they don't muck it up, but dedicate themselves to making it into what it has the potential to be.
You're a little confused. The 7-series actually debuted first, the 5-series second. The 5-series is riding on a modified 7-series platform, not the other way around. The car has been selling just fine, too.
Its really a silly argument actually. What difference does it make? Who has the internal document that says either was the approach for the 5 or the 7, or the 6 for that matter? For this generation of the 5er and 7er it is a wash IMO and a matterless point.
M
I posted a fact, there's nothing under dispute. The 7 hit the streets a full year before the 5 did. End of discussion. There's no "wash". Funny how no one cared when the speculation was that the S-class was going to be the first to use the MRA platform. But I digress...
I posted a fact, there's nothing under dispute. The 7 hit the streets a full year before the 5 did. End of discussion. There's no "wash". Funny how no one cared when the speculation was that the S-class was going to be the first to use the MRA platform. But I digress...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.