- Messages
- 10,045
I heard someone say that Lucid's have a far better interior quality. Can't verify that though.Lucid would be really nice if it didn't cost two Plaids.
I heard someone say that Lucid's have a far better interior quality. Can't verify that though.Lucid would be really nice if it didn't cost two Plaids.
A starting price of 70k for a Model S should improve the sales.
I guess most EV adopters already know that Tesla is the best EV maker so they don't need to prove anything with an unpractical 200k Roadster, nobody will buy it anyway.
I think that people who buy 200k cars want luxury, brand name, rarity, which Tesla has none of this.
It looks better , at least.I heard someone say that Lucid's have a far better interior quality. Can't verify that though.
Tell that to Cybertruck buyers, that pay even 150-200k for one right now...
Well , Model S is 66k and above...So a new model would be in this range.
Yes and no.Now that the new Model 3 Performance is out, is the Model S worth paying double?
That braking test it's irrelevant . It's impossible for the Tesla to break better . Just a bad driver and bad tires.
I don't understand how guys like this , with "experience" in this domain , say that there is a 100hp loss, because the top speed is different.
Clearly stripped interior.Stock? How long does a Nevera take?
I have been asking myself the same… Is it even selling anymore?Is this car ever going to be replaced?
I understand keeping it on the marker for 10-12 years. For longer than that seems crazy.
According to them , still sells pretty ok , given the fact that it's 10yo .I have been asking myself the same… Is it even selling anymore?
Yes, transparancy has never been one of Tesla’s strong sides….According to them , still sells pretty ok , given the fact that it's 10yo .
But there are 0 news regarding any release. And 0 plans.
I don't know what is going on at Tesla HQ , but they totally lost their mojo.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.