I was quoted $84k for a fully optioned GLC 250 and $105k for the GLC 43. I think the 43 is worth the extra $21k but only just, ideally I would prefer to have the car for $100k.Has anyone done the sums on what a fully loaded GLC250 costs compared to the GLC43?
In your opinion, Monster, would the 43 be worth the extra $$ ?
Only have the 250 petrol engine in my C. Dynamically I am actually quite surprised by how similar it felt to my car, steering feels just as tight and sharp, the turn in is just as responsive, body stays very flat during cornering. The ride never really settles, even on comfort mode. It seems to be the case for all recent Mercedes with sports suspension setup.
![]()
The twin turbo V6 is two to three levels above the engine in my car. It has good response, no lag or hesitation even from partial throttle application, and it revs freely. Half throttle on this car feels like full throttle on my car. Previously I was skeptical about this "43 AMG" range, however I am now more convinced than before that this will fill the gap nicely between the normal cars and the full "63" AMG models.
![]()
http://www.caradvice.com.au/428684/mercedes-amg-glc63-to-make-use-of-new-e63-drivetrain-will-not-use-c63-bits/Further to that, Moers has said in the past that the new AMG-developed all-wheel-drive system has been engineered to allow drift, to maintain that rear-drive feel if the driver so desires. He stressed the point that the four-wheel-drive system has been “engineered by us”.
“And in our understanding, all other 63 models coming up to the market, they have to use the new, more sophisticated drivetrain, Moers said.
Somehow I don't think the new AMG front grill will work well with those headlights.That GLC AMG 63 mule looks great. Lower stance with extra wide tyres and aggressive front intakes make it look menacing.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.