It's the same things BMW does with the 4 series coupe, or Audi with the A5 coupe.
Not really, not at all, the ones you named are cars that are clearly different from the 4-door ones, extremely different, it's more than obvious, so obvious that I don't understand why you mention that which is the complete opposite
Agreed. It’s a very good looking and tasteful C class coupé extended facelift. What it’s not, is a suitable offering for the current E class coupé customers.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This would have been a great C-Class update.
M
It's the morning after. I have sobered up and think the car looks fine. Think about the big picture. The new C, S and E front ends aren't exactly revolutionary. Therefore it was plausible that the CLE wouldn't rock the boat.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This would have been a great C-Class update.
M
I agree with this 100%The carry-over of the GLC Coupé's rear fascia (already inconceivable per se) is likely to blame for the very slanted decklid and subsequently the very small space left to fit the trunklid -- what works well on the GLC Coupé thanks to a taller rear end and a prominent rearward poking spoiler that counteracts the forward lean doesn't work on the CLE anymore due to the lack of such spoiler
Agree 100%. This car’s design is so cheap it’s just offensive for MB as a brand.I seriously find it incredible they put the very same rear lights as the GLC. Incredible in the negative sense. Probably a new all time low for MB.
The whole rear looks ridiculous because of those lights. The slope of the deck is completely over the top......
Only view I remotely like is the side because of its proportions. And even the side looks weak.
At least BMW has the NK revolution upcoming. Hope something similar is happening at MB, because they both are at their lowest points.
Agree 100%. This car’s design is so cheap it’s just offensive for MB as a brand.
MMA, MB.EA, AMG.EA platform..I seriously find it incredible they put the very same rear lights as the GLC. Incredible in the negative sense. Probably a new all time low for MB.
The whole rear looks ridiculous because of those lights. The slope of the deck is completely over the top......
Only view I remotely like is the side because of its proportions. And even the side looks weak.
At least BMW has the NK revolution upcoming. Hope something similar is happening at MB, because they both are at their lowest points.
MMA, MB.EA, AMG.EA platform..
Cannot agree more.Agree 100%. This car’s design is so cheap it’s just offensive for MB as a brand.
Really hard to be a fan of the 3 big German brands nowadays.
BMW 8 series coupe - 4.851 mm
Mercedes CLE coupe - 4.850 mm
In the photos it can be seen chunky and unfortunately the proportions and design of the profile are traced to the C-Class coupe, (I must say that I saw the latter in person recently and it is much nicer), much better than in photos, but those measurements of the CLE are no coincidence, it is much bigger than any previous E-Cass. And with that fact in mind, this car IRL has to look somewhat more "elegant" than the C-Coupe and beyond that, its appearance must be impressive to look at due to its enormous size without a doubt.
The front however, the one I see is identical to the CLA, I don't know if in "giant" size it is as luxurious as a big coupe deserves or it will only look cheap.
It completely lacks the aura of the E-Class'es prior to the CLK's, and of the two CLKs themselves, it does not achieve what I wanted it to be... a Mercedes coupe with that secret magic, but well, today you have to shut up until you see them in person, for now it looks boring more than anything.
Mercedes is mistakenly appealing to continue being a brand for old people IMO, those of the BIN parts puzzle of other models have already gone from funny to embarrassing
*Not a minor detail, it is almost 9 cm taller than the 8 coupe! being the same length.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.