- Messages
- 19,985
- Name
- Martin
You sound like a raving lunatic in that post. Why all the bold and caps? Do you think I can't read? Is this really the the ultimate question? And where did I ever call you a heretic?Now is the time for the ULTIMATE QUESTION (especially aimed at @martinbo):
For years I have been saying the Porsche sportscars (now 911 and 718) lacked double wishbone front suspension. Porsche worshipers that could not stand me pointing out the flaw of their -- in their own blinded eyes -- "perfect" god, called me a heretic.
If I was a heretic, and their Porsche was perfect as god, WHY does this new 911 GT3 have the "not needed" double-wishbone front suspension instead of the "perfect" McPherson struts?
again:
WHY DOES 992 GT3 HAVE DOUBLE WISHBONE INSTEAD OF MCPHERSON STRUTS?
You say, that you, clearly a performance car expert and suspension geometry guru pointed out a flaw (you better look up that definition) in their product.
Well then the answer is quite simple, Porsche ensured that the McPherson strut layout delivered excellent results and this was proven in everything from driver appeal to track performance to sales volumes.
Now Porsche has decided to implement double wishbones because they want to do even better.
You see, the problem with being an internet armchair punter is that it's easy to spout fancy terms. But unless you actually have first hand experience as to how flawed the previous suspension setup was and how it affected your personal attempt at a Ring lap record, then I really don't think you're posing anything ultimate at all.