Are you talking about this cute little thing?....."After the brilliant M2 and M5 CS, last year’s M4 CSL promised greatness but ultimately failed to live up to the sum of its parts, the CSL treatment injecting compromise rather than engagement and thrills. The M3 CS is the polar opposite, with an approach that, like its cousins that have undergone a similar CS transformation, results in one of the most resolved and exciting cars of its type. An M3 Competition is a car that’s hard to knock; it remains the best in its class, and many will find the CS’s £34,000 premium difficult to stomach (which we get), but if you can and have gone for an M3 CS you’ve picked one of the all-time greats."
- Stuart Gallagher for Evo.
can't get over how bad it looks compared to the concept (or in general).
To me it is obvious, why the "CS" moniker/ingredients work opposed to the "CSL":"After the brilliant M2 and M5 CS, last year’s M4 CSL promised greatness but ultimately failed to live up to the sum of its parts, the CSL treatment injecting compromise rather than engagement and thrills. The M3 CS is the polar opposite, with an approach that, like its cousins that have undergone a similar CS transformation, results in one of the most resolved and exciting cars of its type. An M3 Competition is a car that’s hard to knock; it remains the best in its class, and many will find the CS’s £34,000 premium difficult to stomach (which we get), but if you can and have gone for an M3 CS you’ve picked one of the all-time greats."
- Stuart Gallagher for Evo.
Btw why is the rear wing fiberglass instead of carbon fiber?
Say it to all the "experts" in design who applauded the renders of the "fixes" that had to be done to the real thing, because it wasn't going to work lolThat aftermarket grille is awful.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.