Poll Mid-sized Luxury Car Interiors (Rank from Best to Worst)


Which looks best?


  • Total voters
    150
Definitely the German trio and Volvo are the best. It's close between the 5-series, A6 and E-class to get my final vote cause each one of them has their own nice unique interior design details. The A6 has the most hi-tech cutting edge look, the 5 series the most technical and simple elegance look while the E-class has the most luxurious and classiest look. Hmmmm eenie meenie minee mor.....ok it's the E-class for me
 
I am very impressed with the interior quality of the 5er. Hardly any cost cutting, and in interior on par with the E39 gen in in terms of quality. And that's saying quite a bit these days....
Me too. It dispenses the chintzy superficiality supposedly associated with an upmarket interior and instead focuses on solidity and tactility. It's a wonderfully robust impression. There are a few hard plastics in areas but these are well out of the way / in hard-wearing areas in any event. Having compared the two interiors 20 mins apart, I feel that the 5er's edges the Merc's in terms of build quality as opposed to aesthetic quality. [i.e. people judge too much with their eyes these days]
 
Me too. It dispenses the chintzy superficiality supposedly associated with an upmarket interior and instead focuses on solidity and tactility. It's a wonderfully robust impression. There are a few hard plastics in areas but these are well out of the way / in hard-wearing areas in any event. Having compared the two interiors 20 mins apart, I feel that the 5er's edges the Merc's in terms of build quality as opposed to aesthetic quality. [i.e. people judge too much with their eyes these days]

Precisely. I was hard pressed faulting the solidity of the 5.
 
I voted for the S90.

BTW, when a good friend of mine decided to change the dashboard and transmission tunnel of his '03 A4, we counted about 120 fasteners (screws, bolts and clips). When we did the same in a '14 the number was 15!
 
I voted for the S90.

BTW, when a good friend of mine decided to change the dashboard and transmission tunnel of his '03 A4, we counted about 120 fasteners (screws, bolts and clips). When we did the same in a '14 the number was 15!
wow...so the new car interiors are mostly constructed by snap on parts?
 
wow...so the new car interiors are mostly constructed by snap on parts?
Yup, and that's why the rattle so much. Snap on parts are great for the first couple of years, but as tolerance is slowly building up in the connections, things go south quickly.

Now, replace the snap on parts, with pocketed guides and screws for plastic and you've got an interior that won't rattle even after an eternity!
 
The E-Class actually beat the 5-series in a head to head in a recent USnews.com report
on interior quality and seat comfort. -->>https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/bmw-5-series-vs-mb-e-class

I have also spent quality time in both these cars as well, more so in the 5-series than the E.
When it comes to quality control in the 5-Series and E-Class I think it is a draw (very close). Fit and finish is above average in both but below the wood panels on the dash and door lines,
you are going to find some cost-cutting in plastics. Both have wabbling center buttons on the console and seat controls.
I have also been behind the wheel of the new S90, though it is very nice I noticed the same thing with the quality control.
I have not seen the new Audi A6 so I can only judge from the pics. (I, however, have seen the latest A4 in the metal
and have noticed the same loose bottons and flexible rubbery hood above the instrument display.

Overall these cars are cutting it very close these days so this is pretty much a subjective topic to be honest.

1.My vote goes to the E first. Overall very good quality interior. Modern sophistication with a touch of old-world classiness.
2. BMW 5-Series. and that is a very close second/ almost a tie with the Merc. The 5er has really good ergonomics as Mortinbo pointed out. The quality of the interior is very good (though I believe the seats are a touch better in the E)
The 5er interior is all business and no play. A little too utilitarian in packaging imo. The symmetrics of the dashboard at play are hardly unique in this ever so busy mid-size luxury car category, still manages to look the part. The E is more distinctive and eye-catching IMO.
3. Volvo S90, very nice interior and quite pleasing in the metal with good to very good quality. The interior is unique as Volvo has not lost its heritage in style but the overall impression is below the E-Class and 5-Series when it comes to prestige and impressions. The steering wheel in this car needs to be improved, looks like a modern day 240 class.
4. Audi A6, Usually trends are flash of the pan general direction themes that do not stand the test of time very well. Not passing judgment on the new A6 yet. just not a fan of the touchscreen instrumentation/ control layout. It looks bland and does not stand out as something unique in the mechanical department.
 
The E-Class actually beat the 5-series in a head to head in a recent USnews.com report
on interior quality and seat comfort. -->>https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/bmw-5-series-vs-mb-e-class.
https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/bmw-5-series-vs-mb-e-class
I don't really believe in these reviews anymore.

1.My vote goes to the E first. Overall very good quality interior. Modern sophistication with a touch of old-world classiness.
2. BMW 5-Series. and that is a very close second/ almost a tie with the Merc. The 5er has really good ergonomics as Mortinbo pointed out. The quality of the interior is very good (though I believe the seats are a touch better in the E)
The 5er interior is all business a...
There is something about those exposed holes to access the screws for the door panels that bothers me on the interior of the E class.
 
^There is always going to be something small to complain about.
That should not distract from the overall experience.
 
Yup, and that's why the rattle so much. Snap on parts are great for the first couple of years, but as tolerance is slowly building up in the connections, things go south quickly.

Now, replace the snap on parts, with pocketed guides and screws for plastic and you've got an interior that won't rattle even after an eternity!
Here's a little write-up on car interiors:

Go back 15 or 20 years and you'll see that car interiors are made from solid pieces. Solid plastic pieces manufactured by injection molding. Injection molding has been a highly precise method to manufacture plastic parts for the last 40 years. Adhesives, on the other hand have only been in the market (read: have been reliable) in the last decade or so. This is the reason that modern interiors use laminated plastic parts quite extensively. You have an inside layer of the worst possible quality of plastic, covered with some elastic layer and then some soft polyurethane based material.

There's a downside to laminated plastics, though. They do not perform well under bending. Actually, they perform terribly and they fail spectacularly, in a failure mode called delamination, where the various layers get separated.

Now, keep in mind that a car chassis, no matter how solid it feels, is a highly flexible structure. A 20000Nm/deg rigidity of the mkI S60 feels like a wet napkin when climbing with one wheel on a curb. A 35000Nm/deg Mercedes will see its doors loose their alignment when you use a jack to change a tyre.

Add to that, that designing parts that snap on one another requires an iterative design procedure in order to find the right tolerances and many, many prototypes in order to get it right.

You, now, understand the sheer brilliance of automotive interiors from some decades ago. Pocketed guides with screws (either for plastic or with metal inserts) meant that plastic parts won't move in relation of one to the other. The flexibility of the interior was based on the flexibility of the solid parts themselves. The interior bits and pieces were free to deform, but not to move.

In a modern automotive interior, laminated parts are not easily deformable. Flexibility is achieved by the means of snap on fitting. One part has a few protuberances, that fit in notches in the next part. It feels solid at first, but as the car gathers miles driving over road irregularities, and the plastic parts have to move relatively in order to follow the chassis deformation, tolerances start to build in the connection, as the protuberance moves in the notch. It doesn't take many years for the protuberance to wear out and the connection to feel as tight as [highly inappropriate comparison removed].

Of course, such snap on connections are massively cheaper to manufacture and assemble, compared to also adding metal screws and having someone screw them in the production line.

Bottom line, that's why modern car interiors rattle. Because its cheaper, faster and, well, better.

:D ;)
 
^There is always going to be something small to complain about.
That should not distract from the overall experience.
I suppose so, IMO it is one thing to cut costs by using lower grade materials or reduce the area of soft trim material but it is another thing when it is designed to be cheap.
 
Here's a little write-up on car interiors:

Go back 15 or 20 years and you'll see that car interiors are made from solid pieces. Solid plastic pieces manufactured by injection molding. Injection molding has been a highly precise method to manufacture plastic parts for the last 40 years. Adhesives, on the other hand have only been in the market (read: have been reliable) in the last decade or so. This is the reason that modern interiors use laminated plastic parts quite extensively. You have an inside layer of the worst possible quality of plastic, covered with some elastic layer and then some soft polyurethane based material.

There's a downside to laminated plastics, though. They do not perform well under bending. Actually, they perform terribly and they fail spectacularly, in a failure mode called delamination, where the various layers get separated.

Now, keep in mind that a car chassis, no matter how solid it feels, is a highly flexible structure. A 20000Nm/deg rigidity of the mkI S60 feels like a wet napkin when climbing with one wheel on a curb. A 35000Nm/deg Mercedes will see its doors loose their alignment when you use a jack to change a tyre.

Add to that, that designing parts that snap on one another requires an iterative design procedure in order to find the right tolerances and many, many prototypes in order to get it right.

You, now, understand the sheer brilliance of automotive interiors from some decades ago. Pock...

So most of the German makes post 2000 would have snap on parts in the interior?
 
Just curious @Monster have you been inside the G30? If so, how would you compare its interior quality with the one on your W213?
 
Just curious @Monster have you been inside the G30? If so, how would you compare its interior quality with the one on your W213?
Yes I have, I think the interior of the G30 feels just a little bit more solid and it does a better job at hiding the areas of cost cutting. However I don't really like the gloss black control panel
 
Yes, I would have to agree.. My 2015 W222 S550 creaks and groans like an old ship. I feel that my old W221 was better built.

from latest Evo

rushi1.webp

n4ulj7.webp
 

Thread statistics

Created
EKaru,
Last reply from
Deleted member 1071,
Replies
60
Views
12,358

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top