Love your perspective and thought contribution as always but I will differ in this regard; I personally respect the ethos but I don't feel it was realised.
No worries, I can accept other peoples perspectives if they're well reasoned
I will say instead the i8 ended up doing less with more:
- Very complex in mechanical terms - as is any hybrid
- High cost, high selling price
- Development and production complexity
- Significantly less efficient when driven dynamically in the spirit of that ethos
I got about 30 minutes into replying to these points, but I was boring even myself - so I'll just respect your opinion and try and keep mine brief! Fundamentally, I don't believe a big stride towards newer, more sustainable technology can be made without upfront costs and resources, and to treat that investment as counter to the end goal makes the whole idea self-defeating (assuming it remains commercial viable). Using this logic leaves us with the oldest surviving cars representing the cheapest way to sustainability, which might be fair, but it brings with it all the other drawbacks that go with that.
Drive train development can be ammortised across all i-Performance vehicles, and the production complexity isn't represented by the i8's price, or the i3 Rex would also be 100k+. It's basically not possible for BMW to produce anything as new/different as this without spending the money... whatever the ethos, be it Poject-i, Rolls-Royce, or Mini.
I have no more than an estimation in this regard but I'm pretty convinced that the weight of the engine, cooling systems, transmission, hybrid-specific electric harness and fossil fuel system components are significant to the extent that the weight of batteries and a rear motor would result in a similar weight outcome. Certainly not 2.2 tons.
B38 engine is about 90kg, transmission is about 100kg, yeah, there are going to be other things to add in there, but the battery module alone in the production R8 E-Tron (for example) was 595kg - that car weighed 1840kg, so admittedly, not 2.2 tonnes, but still 300kg more than an i8. The i8 and i3 motors are about 50kg each. The weight difference between the P60 and P100D is also about 300kg, so all things considered, I don't think it's unreasonable to think that a powertrain to match the P100D would put the i8 north of 2 tonnes.
The biggest issue is that the i8 - as much as I get and admire what it stands for - did not live up to the expectations created by its maker.
... I'd say by peoples hopes and dreams. I don't recall BMW pitching it as the car people now complain that its not (though I could be wrong, I tend to ignore the drivel that is BMW marketing speak), but I do recall it having a small engine and hybrid system from the very outset.