I would not have expected that. Usually sports or super cars start running out of puff beyond 120mph/200kmh.even up to 300 basically
I would not have expected that. Usually sports or super cars start running out of puff beyond 120mph/200kmh.
where do we go from here? Will cars be able to do 200kmh in 3 seconds in ten years time? We will inevitably reach the limits of tyre or road conditions. Racing cars can usually go fast safely because tyres are brand new, heated, track is warm and driver knows how to drive the car responsibly.
I'm just going by the data 17.7 s vs. 17.5 s to 300.I would not have expected that. Usually sports or super cars start running out of puff beyond 120mph/200kmh.
where do we go from here? Will cars be able to do 200kmh in 3 seconds in ten years time? We will inevitably reach the limits of tyre or road conditions. Racing cars can usually go fast safely because tyres are brand new, heated, track is warm and driver knows how to drive the car responsibly.
Those cars are ideal in countries with smooth roads and warm climates. Here in the uk they would be wasted. Cold, grease surfaces and pot holes are everywhere here in the south East of England. Small bumps are concealed dangers. One wheel in the air is enough to send you off the road even if you are responsible with the throttle.So my sports car journey started with a BMW i8 10 years ago. Very underrated car. I loved it. I’d still get one. It was punchy but certainly nothing by today standards. However 100 in 4.2 and 200 in 14/15 seconds isn’t anything to sneeze at and the car feels quick. From there, I had an Acura NSX. Big step up in performance. Then a Ferrari 458, another step up. Then a 458 Speciale. Basically even but again now we’re mid 3’s to 100 and around 10/11 seconds to 200.
But then, 765, and boom. High 2s to 100 and 7 to 200 and I’ll tell you, the difference is dramatic and feels a lot for the street. I still get scared driving it. I don’t think cars ever need to be quicker than a 765. They aren’t more enjoyable any quicker than that and in the states 50-250 km/h is kind of all that matters for acceleration and you’ll only be above 200 for a few seconds before braking.
I’ve had the pleasure of having seat time in a lot of amazing cars and owning others since I got my 765. Veyrons, Chirons, Hauyras, 918, P1, LAF, etc. The 765 is as violent or more so than any of these in usable acceleration for a mere fraction of the cost. The 296 on paper pulls neck and neck with the 765. I’m not sure about it in person. It’s mega, but delivers performance differently. I need to get my dragy on it this spring.
I don’t know where acceleration is headed but anything over what was available 15 years ago in the Veyron SS and now matched by the 765 and 296 is not necessary. There’s a reason Revuelto, 296, 765, SF90 all pull near identical 50-250 km/h. It’s the sweet spot of crazy where enjoyment can still be had.
Those cars are ideal in countries with smooth roads and warm climates. Here in the uk they would be wasted. Cold, grease surfaces and pot holes are everywhere here in the south East of England. Small bumps are concealed dangers. One wheel in the air is enough to send you off the road even if you are responsible with the throttle.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.