Autozeitung: Audi RS6 | BMW M5 | Jaguar XF-R | MB E 63 AMG | Porsche Panamera Turbo

[Sayyaaf]

^ martin: That is the wise thing to do , but I think you shouldn't be wise enough to drive this kind of cars

 

[klier]

Hey there European buddies... what car can 45 250 Euros buy me?

That really depends, since every European country has his own tax sytem...
In my country, a 318i high executive costs 46,000 Euro....for that money, you can buy a 330i in Germany...

 

[ateekt]

M5 is a gem, will definitely take it over all those! 5 years old & still stand fresh with all fancy newbies!

I love everything of Panamera, apart from it's fugly shape! It's interior & power-train is to die for!

 

[HighestOfHigh]

M5 is a gem, will definitely take it over all those! 5 years old & still stand fresh with all fancy newbies!

I love everything of Panamera, apart from it's fugly shape! It's interior & power-train is to die for!

The Porsche would be perfect if it weren't for the hatchback rear. Other then that, it's flawless especially in the performance department.

 

[cawimmer430]

Somebody can't drive if they can't get an E63 to 60 mph in under 4.5 secs, those times are bs. Car and Driver, Road and Track all do better.

M

I wouldn't be surprised if these are the manufacturer claims. I've never had the impression that German car magazines seriously test 0-100 km/h times. As much as I hate Car and Driver they do their 0-60 tests really good.

 

[HighestOfHigh]

I wouldn't be surprised if these are the manufacturer claims. I've never had the impression that German car magazines seriously test 0-100 km/h times. As much as I hate Car and Driver they do their 0-60 tests really good.

I completely agree with that!

 

[ateekt]

The Porsche would be perfect if it weren't for the hatchback rear. Other then that, it's flawless especially in the performance department.

Right you are... basically, it's the rear-end that mess the looks of whole car up!

 

[Guibo]

RE: C&D
Unlike most European magazines, C&D corrects their performance numbers for weather conditions and elevation. Variations in track surfaces, break-in mileage, and tolerances in components can all affect 0-60 times. It doesn't have to come down to the driver (though it can).

 

[Zafiro]

I wouldn't be surprised if these are the manufacturer claims. I've never had the impression that German car magazines seriously test 0-100 km/h times. As much as I hate Car and Driver they do their 0-60 tests really good.

Excuse me. BMW factory time for M5 isnt 4.6 seconds or 3.9 sec for Panamera. Just because its not the same time as C&D doesnt mean these are worthless. We know C&D meassure acceleration in a different way. They use a technique hardly anyone use in real life.
Christ boys, if I didnt know better you guys have a problem with these times because E63 didnt had the quickest time.

 

[bum-man]

^That time of the month again?

 

[Sunny]

RE: C&D
Unlike most European magazines, C&D corrects their performance numbers for weather conditions and elevation. Variations in track surfaces, break-in mileage, and tolerances in components can all affect 0-60 times. It doesn't have to come down to the driver (though it can).

yea and make it a an automatic with launch control as in the case of E63 and the driver skill plays even lesser role.

 

[Zafiro]

^That time of the month again?

My body have allergic reactions to some posts, thats all

 

[Zafiro]

- Panamera won the test and M5 on last place.
- M5 quicker than E63,RS6,XFR up to 200km/h
- M5 lost on the track with 0.01 seconds against E63
- M5 much higher slalom speed than E63,RS6,XFR.
- Panamera fastest in acceleration and the fastest car on the track.

I also read a swedish test between E63 and Panamera Turbo and the Panamera won that comparison as well. Panamera also scored better in 'driving comfort' than E63.


Panamera is winning every single test...

 

[andrazpotocnik1]

Auto motor sport test:Audi RS6

Audi RS6 :
0-100 km/h 4,7 s
0-160 km/h 10,1 s
0-200 km/h 15,6 s

Mercedes E 63 AMG:
0-100 km/h 4,5 s
0-160 km/h 9,8 s
0-200 km/h 14,9 s

Porsche Panamera Turbo:
0-100 km/h 4,2 s
0-160 km/h 9,5 s
0-200 km/h 14,9 s

 

[Merc1]

^^ Those times are more like it.

Am I reading that other post right, the M5 lost to the E63 on a track?

M

 

[Zafiro]

^^ Those times are more like it.

Am I reading that other post right, the M5 lost to the E63 on a track?

M

yes, by 0.01 seconds If my memory is correct, 1.43,0 min vs 1.42,9 min.

 

[Merc1]

Yep, and such a difference doesn't matter now right?

M

 

[Zafiro]

Yep, and such a difference doesn't matter now right?

M

Not much of a difference really, its like one tyre length ahead
- RS6 quicker than M5 and E63 and if I recall correct, XFR also quicker than M5 and E63.
Panamera was like 2-3 seconds faster than all the others on the track, impressive for a weird looking car you an say the other cars were owned on this track.

 

[Merc1]

Not much of a difference really, its like one tyre length ahead
- RS6 quicker than M5 and E63 and if I recall correct, XFR also quicker than M5 and E63.
Panamera was like 2-3 seconds faster than all the others on the track, impressive for a weird looking car you an say the other cars were owned on this track.

Predictable response.


M

 

[Hadi]

Auto motor sport test:Audi RS6

Audi RS6 :
0-100 km/h 4,7 s
0-160 km/h 10,1 s
0-200 km/h 15,6 s

Mercedes E 63 AMG:
0-100 km/h 4,5 s
0-160 km/h 9,8 s
0-200 km/h 14,9 s

Porsche Panamera Turbo:
0-100 km/h 4,2 s
0-160 km/h 9,5 s
0-200 km/h 14,9 s

M5 :
0 - 100 = 4.7
0 - 200 = 13.5

M5 rules ...already 5 years old n still faster than all the 3 above!!!