Human only said what he saw out of his experience, but didn't say BMW is everything did he?
What Human wrote I have absolutely no problem with. But it was that final sentance "looks like BMW new (sic) something we did not" which I took objection to, that's all.
Human seemed to be drawing a conclusion on the success of the 5GT based on seeing something at his local dealership.
In a business perspective, a company (not just car companies) would not be stupid enough to produce a product with no demand. The 5er GT clearly has ingredients that the clients asked for, BMW just made the right recipe.
What does this have to do with anything? I'm not saying that the 5GT won't have demand. I even said in my post that I'm not against the 5GT at all. And it wouldn't surprise me if it did sell. So what on Earth are you talking about?
Oh, and two words to you. Renault Aventime.
Now let's calm ourselves and have some ice cream
Erm, I'm perfectly calm.
^^^
1. They knew what they were doing in bringing the GT concept to live and actually making production versions.
Again, you just don't get it do you? SALES are what count, not how many people turn up at your local dealership to have a gawp.
Anyway, BMW ill have ensured that the 5GT is built in sufficiently small numbers that it will be judged a success.
Because it's one dealership in one city in one country. Hardly representative is it?
3. And says who? You, mr. know it all?
Sorry, have we moved out to the playground now have we? "Mr know it all"? I don't know where to begin explaining how childish this is.
4. Micro view? Well, if I cannot share the views and interests of my local community, friends etc...what's the use of this forum?
By all means share them. It was your "looks like BMW new (sic) something we don't" comment which is wrong. My post was simply saying what you saw means nothing in the grand scheme of things.
Why are people so bloody sensitive? You're on a public forum. If you don't like people challenging your public views then don't express them.
haha J/K
