Whether or not he has a terrible personality doesn't mean he should be penalized or lose the championship.
That would be pretty sh*tty wouldn't it? Being the best driver, or winning the world championship, isn't (and shouldn't) be a popularity contest. Rooting against a driver is one thing, fixing the race is another.
Unfortunately thats life isn't it? As the old saying goes "its not what you know, its who you know". There's also another saying: "Karma, its a bitch isn't it?". Fact is that drivers don't like the aggressive style of Hamilton. Kubica, Alonso, Webber and Trulli are examples of drivers who have publicly expressed this fact. And why shouldn't they? Its their lives on the road that they have to protect, and if someone decides they want to risk that in order to get past you, then I would voice my opinion too. Plus its not like they can voice their opinions amongst themselves, because thats right, Hamilton refuses to be part of the Drivers Association.
Besides, since when was F1 fair? Since the start of F1, it never has been fair - thats the nature of F1. If F1 was fair, then everyone would have equal cars with equal crews and equal budgets. Heck, who knows if Hamilton/Massa really is the best driver? All we know for sure is that McLaren and Ferrari have the best cars/crews/design teams for 2008.
You realise, whatever the FIA do, they can't win. If they take one decision, they will be blasted by one camp for not acting. If they take another decision, they will blasted by the other camp. Unfortunately, I'm in the opposing camp to you. I think Hamilton deserves everything he's been given.Centurion said:Having been treated as a second class citizen by FIA I now authorize Hamilton to act as cocky as he likes. I would be that as well if FIA were penalizing you for nothing while letting the main competitor slip away from every single misterminor.

