- Messages
- 11,247
Both gorgeous IMO. I would have to sit in and experience both to choose. In both cases though I would opt for more classically beautiful luxury trims.
I found out it won't
Even on the GT full digital display is optional equipment... ffs.![]()
Strange strategy for Merc about engines.
They offer just top versions, except 53.
They don't offer diesel like Panamera or A7.
They should offer diesel also if they want to compete Panamera and A7, or don't offer nothing below 63.
3,0d biturbo would fine boost sales numbers in Europe.
You should stop considering this to be a direct competitor to the Panamera. It's probably the Panamera's closest competitor, but not direct (like a E-class vs. 5-series). This is going to be altogether more hard edged vehicle which is why it is an AMG car only.
Maybe you haven't heard yet, that Porsche quits to offer diesels in its carsStrange strategy for Merc about engines.
They offer just top versions, except 53.
They don't offer diesel like Panamera or A7.
They should offer diesel also if they want to compete Panamera and A7, or don't offer nothing below 63.
3,0d biturbo would fine boost sales numbers in Europe.
Are we absolutely sure of this? It has the touch pad and everything.
I guess being E-class based the it doesn't have the touchscreen main display yet?
Strange strategy for Merc about engines.
They offer just top versions, except 53.
They don't offer diesel like Panamera or A7.
They should offer diesel also if they want to compete Panamera and A7, or don't offer nothing below 63.
3,0d biturbo would fine boost sales numbers in Europe.
Or maybe they will offer cheaper options down the line.
I heard they're bringing a 43 around September...And encroach on the CLS? That defeats the entire purpose of having both. Do expect this car to go the other direction and get more expensive variants down the road though.
he
I heard they're bringing a 43 around September...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.