bimmerjph
Diesel Dynamiker
+1Not impressed with the exhaust note.
Although I want to make it clear that I love the inline six sound, just not THAT inline six's sound.
+1Not impressed with the exhaust note.
Lol Klier, why not 200HP/200kilos? The car is already making ~470 HP according to most dynos. I don't think it needs anymore. Weight is interesting. There is some easy gains to be made - bucket seats, stripped out inside, thinner glass surfaces, CF hood maybe. Beyond that it is going to be difficult and expensive. The car is already light for it's size. Think about it, despite being a proper 2+2/4 seater based on bog 3er, M3/4 is as light/lighter than the AMG GT - a much more expensive dedicated 2 seater sports car.
Lol Klier, why not 200HP/200kilos? The car is already making ~470 HP according to most dynos. I don't think it needs anymore. Weight is interesting. There is some easy gains to be made - bucket seats, stripped out inside, thinner glass surfaces, CF hood maybe. Beyond that it is going to be difficult and expensive. The car is already light for it's size. Think about it, despite being a proper 2+2/4 seater based on bog 3er, M3/4 is as light/lighter than the AMG GT - a much more expensive dedicated 2 seater sports car.
If it gets 100hp extra, and is 100kg less, then it will 100,000 big ones more expensive too!
So?
The base M4 is cheap to begin with for what it offers. M4 GTS/CSL should be priced at/perform at 991 GT3 levels.
The standard M4 isn't even close to the standard 991 in terms of desirability. I'll refrain from comparing a GT3 to a car that doesn't exist yet.
The 911 has moved to an altogether higher level with the 991, both in terms of price and perceived status within motoring hierarchy. The M4 IS a good car. A very good one, and it's something I'd love to own one day. But it's no 911.
You don't get to decide what is desirable, sorry.
Whilst I do agree with you from a philosophical standpoint, I still have to wonder why I want an M4 more than a base 911. For me, it's the M4 that's the more desirable vehicle for my needs and wants. The problem with 911s and Caymans is that they are strictly two-people affairs (don't tell me about the rear seats in a 911 - my 10 year old can't get her legs behind either front seat) and therefore rather selfish things. An M4 you can enjoy more of the time with up to four people on board. Now, make it an M3 and the usability factor goes up further.
The 911 has moved to an altogether higher level with the 991, both in terms of price and perceived status within motoring hierarchy.
Whilst I do agree with you from a philosophical standpoint, I still have to wonder why I want an M4 more than a base 911.
M4 isn't cheap, no one buy a standard M4 anymore, the ones I've seen are fully loaded with extra goodies which makes the price closer to a M5. Whats wrong with people!
I think the usability of the M3/M4 is why it sells to the levels it does. I agree, being able to take three people along with you for the ride is a huge bonus. But is that really desirability? By that argument (and I'm taking it to the extreme here), the LaFerrari isn't as desirable as the M3.
But in my conservative, yet still upwardly mobile circumstances an M4 is more desirable
so would you say you're following the law of jante (it's strong here in norway)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Jante
so would you say you're following the law of jante (it's strong here in norway)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Jante
As for the M4 being "cheap"? Really? Give it six months and there will be massive discounts on offer, just like the E92 M3, and therefore it's overpriced. The market decides that, just like the market has decided the M5 and M6 are overpriced and why you can get huge discounts on new cars. From my own observations of other, less BMW focused forums, the M3/M4 has been met with a luke-warm reaction. Most seem to think BMW are having a laugh charging what they do for what they PERCEIVE to be a slightly modified N55 engine. "Why buy an M4 when you can get an M135i for £30,000 less, or buy a 435d xDrive with 0-100 in 4.7 seconds?"
You try getting a similar discount on a 911.
Whilst I do agree with you from a philosophical standpoint, I still have to wonder why I want an M4 more than a base 911. For me, it's the M4 that's the more desirable vehicle for my needs and wants. The problem with 911s and Caymans is that they are strictly two-people affairs (don't tell me about the rear seats in a 911 - my 10 year old can't get her legs behind either front seat) and therefore rather selfish things. An M4 you can enjoy more of the time with up to four people on board. Now, make it an M3 and the usability factor goes up further.
Well, i think M3/M4 is probably a better value than any other m3 that came before it, just because of how much of engineering was put in it. Probably every m3 has been met with luke-warm reaction really. And the last quote is just dumb, anyone who thinks like that should just get 435d xdrive and be done with it.
Whilst I do agree with you from a philosophical standpoint, I still have to wonder why I want an M4 more than a base 911. For me, it's the M4 that's the more desirable vehicle for my needs and wants. The problem with 911s and Caymans is that they are strictly two-people affairs (don't tell me about the rear seats in a 911 - my 10 year old can't get her legs behind either front seat) and therefore rather selfish things. An M4 you can enjoy more of the time with up to four people on board. Now, make it an M3 and the usability factor goes up further.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.