Nothing wrong with that, some Mulsanne owners probably want to project that kind of image when they are on the road.They kind of have overdone it over the original. But they were looking for product placement for the remake of ...
![]()
"Das Auto"
Nothing wrong with that, some Mulsanne owners probably want to project that kind of image when they are on the road.They kind of have overdone it over the original. But they were looking for product placement for the remake of ...
![]()
"Das Auto"
I always struggled with its already "less than perfect" looks ......but that wide grille is too much for me - its proportions are all wrong and it lacks dignity.They have made it perfect IMO and the LWB really fits the Mully's profile. It has a high-end old school British look to it (reminding me of the Queen's Bentley limo). I think I like it more than the Phantom now.
I always struggled with its already "less than perfect" looks ......but that wide grille is too much for me - its proportions are all wrong and it lacks dignity.
But you may have a point BBG, about it looking more like a Phantom; maybe that is very intentional.
Oops, I have a habit of misreading posts sometimesHaha, I said I think I like it more than the Phantom, not that it looks like a Phantom. It looks nothing like a Phantom to me. Bentley perfected the Mulsanne IMO and to me its one of the best looking sedans.
Just when I thought automakers were abandoning excessive chrome trim....its back in full force. Not sold on the new front yet.
![]()
![]()
Barring the interior and the addition of an EWB, I am not liking the new details. I am fine with the "B" on the fender wing gills, but it looks too contrived on the rearlights (as it does on the Bentayga).
I don<t like the new face, the rear light on the other hand have some nice details. Is the new screen unhidable ?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.