In the latest issue of AutoBild Sportscars there's a comparison between two tuned-RS3s.
MR-Racing's 404-hp-version managed a time of 4,0 seconds to 100 kph and 16,0 s to 200 km/h. Tij Power's RS3 did 4,0 s & 16,3 s. (The fastest times AutoBild SC measured with the stock RS3 are 4,2 respectively 16,7 s.)
Now, the interesting part: both tuned-versions' 100-200 km/h is much slower than the times by a stock RS3 tested by AMS (12,0 & 12,3 s versus the fantastic time of the "stock's" 11,2 s).
How? Both magazines use the same testing methodes.
This is what I'm talking about. AMS' 100-200 km/h time is 2,1 (!) seconds better than Sport Auto's with a different testcar...
It doesn't sound like Audi are at their work, it sounds like AMS are. Does the letters AMS stand for "Audi Must Succeed"
Remove the two outers (AMS and Sport Auto) and you are left with consistent times, is there any other data from else where in the world to see just how big a variation there is?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.