That's a year old comparison when the 530 still had the 225hp motor, not the 255hp motorHALO said:
bmwrules said:That's a year old comparison when the 530 still had the 225hp motor, not the 255hp motor
Look at 1st page from the comparisonHALO said:It's actually 9 months old.
The Bmw costs that much and only offers 255. That is a shame.
Road Test: 2005 BMW 530i vs. Jaguar S-Type 3.0 vs. Audi A6 3.2 quattro vs. Cadillac STS V6 vs. Infiniti M35 vs. Acura RL
Six Degrees of Separation: A flog can be a slog unless you're in the right car.
By Ron Sessions
Photography by John Kiewicz & Brian Vance
Motor Trend, March 2005
AlxAmg said:![]()
Hehehe... Personally im not a brand fan, im open to cars. I like what i like, not by brand, strictly by looks performance, and overall reliability. I think the M45 is incredible, i saw it at the car show and was blown away by it.
bmwrules said:Look at 1st page from the comparison
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0503_luxury_sport_comparison/
Looking at this says it is at least a year old. And the fact that issues come out before the month that is on the magazine means it is about 13 months old.
I will agree that the 530 with 225hp was overpriced.
HALO said:the thing I do like about BMW is the maintenance program
Maintenance cost for 4 years/50,000 miles, whichever comes first:*
- Brake Pads: $0
- Brake Rotors: $0
- Engine Belts: $0
- Oil Changes: $0
- Wiper Blade Inserts: $0
- Inspections: $0
HALO said:regardless IMO Infiniti M is #1.![]()
bmwrules said:but IMO the 5 series is a better car.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.