SDNR
Kraftwagen König
- Messages
- 10,192
Yup........you are 100% correct.Interesting info indeed, but lets get back to the Maybach
.....and we could say similar things about BMW's Rolls-Royce.
Yup........you are 100% correct.Interesting info indeed, but lets get back to the Maybach
Rolls-Royce wasn't dead per se, but for most car enthusiasts, it stirred about as much passion and interest as the Tori Spelling bathing suit section of a desktop image gallery website.Rolls Royce was never a dead brand![]()
Sure ........but you shouldn't worry too much about that. I've known you long enough to know you can deal with "bugs"Interesting info indeed, but lets get back to the Maybach
I edited Rob, didn't want to create a stir. I still have these bugs swarming me.
That's correct Hannaz, the 57 was usually a sports coupé.
Bugatti were not traditionally competitors with Rolls-Royce .......but there certainly was a big rivalry with Bentley.
Ettore Bugatti was very competitive with W.0. Bentley.
The Type 41 (also known as Royale) was a major commercial failure for Bugatti .....in a way that makes Daimler's recent experiences with Maybach look exceedingly positive.
In fact, if we're talking limousines, the USA had several outstanding Rolls-Royce rivals ........and Rolls-Royce even had a factory in the USA before WW2.
^yeah, I know you were just having some fun.
I agree with your comments ........I think we all know this whole Maybach naming is purely marketting. I expect we'll soon see something similar from Bentley.
Just read this article on Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenpope/2014/11/11/mercedes-maybach-magic-or-mistake/
The author raised some interesting points .....his conclusions weren't too positive.
Btw, I noted some grammatical errors in the article ......you'd expect better from Forbes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.