Attainable luxury was not the point of Mercedes. That is what the Asians luxury brands are for. A lot of Mercedes’ appeal came from stupid expensive cars that only a few could afford even during the 190E and 240D days. A 190E was quite expensive for what it was.Mercedes have the brand cache to move into proper luxury, but they would in turn become a smaller business overall. Higher margin yes, but smaller volume.
Their cars are already barely obtainable, but they would move into pure unobtainium if they moved up any further. The whole point of Mercedes was attainable luxury. Yeah they had the enormous ultra-luxury 560SE and 600SLs, but for each of those they also had 190E or 240D which sold in large numbers.
The issue with the SL, is that its just not that great of a product for what it is. The GT, which shares the same underpinnings is outselling it by a ridiculous margin. The SL in general has the baggage of being seen as an old-man car for the better part of 40 years. Long gone are the days of the racing pedigree from the 300SL, which was adopted into the SLS and now the GT.
Yeah they share the same architecture, but the layman doesn't know or care. They associate with the brand, and the SL brand is past its prime. They'd need to make something on the level of a 911 spyder to even stand a chance of reinvigorating that name plate, and in the current regulatory environment, that's basically impossible.
The Mercedes cars from the 70's/80s especially the 190 range and W123/W124 ranges were vastly more expensive than rivals and were poorly equipped in comparison, they were not high value for your buck cars. But where they stood out was their unbeatable engineering, build quality, longevity, refinement and chassis behavior which no rivals except for BMW could match. But nowadays there are much cheaper cars that are approaching Mercedes levels of build and not that far behind in refinement, the USP of Mercedes is slowly been eroded away.Attainable luxury was not the point of Mercedes. That is what the Asians luxury brands are for. A lot of Mercedes’ appeal came from stupid expensive cars that only a few could afford even during the 190E and 240D days. A 190E was quite expensive for what it was.
M
Mercedes have the brand cache to move into proper luxury, but they would in turn become a smaller business overall. Higher margin yes, but smaller volume.
Their cars are already barely obtainable, but they would move into pure unobtainium if they moved up any further. The whole point of Mercedes was attainable luxury. Yeah they had the enormous ultra-luxury 560SE and 600SLs, but for each of those they also had 190E or 240D which sold in large numbers.
The issue with the SL, is that its just not that great of a product for what it is. The GT, which shares the same underpinnings is outselling it by a ridiculous margin. The SL in general has the baggage of being seen as an old-man car for the better part of 40 years. Long gone are the days of the racing pedigree from the 300SL, which was adopted into the SLS and now the GT.
Yeah they share the same architecture, but the layman doesn't know or care. They associate with the brand, and the SL brand is past its prime. They'd need to make something on the level of a 911 spyder to even stand a chance of reinvigorating that name plate, and in the current regulatory environment, that's basically impossible.
They said they continue with the loss making SL because of old mMercedes have the brand cache to move into proper luxury, but they would in turn become a smaller business overall. Higher margin yes, but smaller volume.
Their cars are already barely obtainable, but they would move into pure unobtainium if they moved up any further. The whole point of Mercedes was attainable luxury. Yeah they had the enormous ultra-luxury 560SE and 600SLs, but for each of those they also had 190E or 240D which sold in large numbers.
The issue with the SL, is that its just not that great of a product for what it is. The GT, which shares the same underpinnings is outselling it by a ridiculous margin. The SL in general has the baggage of being seen as an old-man car for the better part of 40 years. Long gone are the days of the racing pedigree from the 300SL, which was adopted into the SLS and now the GT.
Yeah they share the same architecture, but the layman doesn't know or care. They associate with the brand, and the SL brand is past its prime. They'd need to make something on the level of a 911 spyder to even stand a chance of reinvigorating that name plate, and in the current regulatory environment, that's basically impossible.
The "old-man" sentiment is simply outdated and needs to be put to bed with this latest version.
The SL63 is a capable performance car that puts out numbers that are close to identical with its GT brother. If the SL is not that great of a product, than neither is the GT. Both share the same under-pinnings as you indicated.
The number on the sales chart look good for the GT but the GT comes in a 4-door Coupe variant. The chart is probably lumping the two together, therefore inflating the numbers. If the chart broke the numbers down it would look quite different for the 2-door GT. The 4-Door GT is selling well.
I have seen numerous charts indicating that sales of convertibles, (no matter the price) have dropped across the board in the US since 2004-05.
There might be a few exceptions but droptop sales are not that great to begin right now, so with that taken into consideration, the SL is probably doing better than expected. These are older charts and articles but I believe still apply today.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Correct. The 300E that introduced me to the brand was very spartan compared to the Cadillacs and Lincoln's I was raised around, but that 300E drove like nothing else and it felt like a rolling bank vault and when you really examined it close up that build was stupendous. Everything was solid and just unlike any car I had ever been around. Every button clicked, when the windows rolled up or when you closed the door, you felt like you being sealed in a chamber, with a thunk or thud. Classic Mercedes.The Mercedes cars from the 70's/80s especially the 190 range and W123/W124 ranges were vastly more expensive than rivals and were poorly equipped in comparison, they were not high value for your buck cars. But where they stood out was their unbeatable engineering, build quality, longevity, refinement and chassis behavior which no rivals except for BMW could match. But nowadays there are much cheaper cars that are approaching Mercedes levels of build and not that far behind in refinement, the USP of Mercedes is slowly been eroded away.
Given how well the GT seems to be selling, has its desirability really been killed?Just looked up the baby g wagon idea from Ola.
What a dumb move.
Kill the desirability of the OG G wagon in one move.
People like that box on wheels so much partly because of exclusivity.
Make a baby version of it for the mass market and the wealthier clientele will feel their product is now less special.
These people just dont think things through.
And so much for going upmarket.
They killed the SL desirability after years of dumb moves, they managed it with the sls and OG amg GT, and now they will kill the desirability of their last true legacy model, the g wagon
Hollywood perpetuated a convertible as a sign of success, freedom, adventure and excitement. Many iconic movies featured a convertible either in the introor ending or a movie.Kids had SL’s up on their wall, and financial traders would splurge their bonus on one.
Yeah, and now its SUVs.Hollywood perpetuated a convertible as a sign of success, freedom, adventure and excitement. Many iconic movies featured a convertible either in the introor ending or a movie.
Buying a red convertible was exciting as getting a mistress during a midlife crisis.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.