IOS is also a rip off. Most of the IOS and Android stuff was copied from preexisting technologies.
I mean everyone knows that.
IOS is also a rip off. Most of the IOS and Android stuff was copied from preexisting technologies.
Which dutch ?
IOS is also a rip off. Most of the IOS and Android stuff was copied from preexisting technologies.
ASML Homepage
They make the machines that make the chips. No new machines from ASML means no new chips for Apple and Samsung.
A technology means nothing if it's not properly implemented.
Apple was the first to make the whole package.
Anyways, I am not here to pick sides between Apple and Samsung. To each his own, both make lovely products.
The "Bionic" part in the name of Apple's A11 Bionic chip isn't just marketing speak. It's the most powerful processor ever put in a mobile phone. We've put this chip to the test in both synthetic benchmarks and some real-world speed trials, and it obliterates every Android phone we tested.
Link: iPhone 8 Is World's Fastest Phone (It's Not Even Close)
Let's start with Geekbench 4, which measures overall performance. On the multicore portion of this test, the iPhone 8 hit 10,170. That's 54 percent faster than the score from Samsung's Galaxy Note 8 — currently the fastest Android phone.
The Android competition wasn't close. The Note 8 scored 6,564, and that's with an impressive 6GB of RAM paired with Qualcomm's fast Snapdragon 835 chip. How about the OnePlus 5 and its 8GB of RAM and Snapdragon 835? That handset got 6,542. With 4GB of RAM, the Galaxy S8 scored 6,295 with the same processor.
![]()
Next up is 3DMark, which gauges graphics performance. The iPhone 8 scored an off-the-charts 62,212, and the iPhone 8 Plus managed an even higher 64,412. Compare that to the Note 8's 39,834 and the OnePlus 5's 39,576.
If you're wondering how all this translates to real-world performance, we have more good news for iPhone 8 shoppers — and bad news for everyone else. To really put the A11 Bionic chip through its paces, we put the same 2-minute video, shot in 4K by a drone, on the iPhone 8, Galaxy Note 8 and Galaxy S8+, and then added the same transitions and effects before exporting and saving the video.
The iPhone 8 finished this strenuous task in just 42 seconds, while the Note 8 took more than 3 minutes. The Galaxy S8+ took more than 4 minutes.
![]()
![]()
Very informative. What the internet's Android warriors won't say.
Very informative. What the internet's Android warriors won't say.
@braaf
So, you don't think Apple make aspirational products? If the technology isn't as good as Samsung, then why do people buy them?
Ask any business or brand analyst and they would say Apple is the classic example of an aspirational brand. The fact that you prefer Android doesn't change that fact.
I'd rather wait and watch that one. I'm happy with my iPhone 8 — which is the same as the iPhone 7, which is the same as the iPhone 6, to me," Wozniak said, speaking from the sidelines of the Money 20/20 conference. "For some reason, the iPhone X is going to be the first iPhone I didn't — on day one — upgrade to. But my wife will, so I'll be close enough to see it."
So guys? Anyone has already bought the iPhone X? Since I am not going to pay 1200 euros it costs in Spain, I am have asked a friend of mine in the US to buy one for me. That would mean 800 euros instead of 1200, which would be even less since I am selling my iPhone 6.
I can only hope there is enough stock for my friend to buy it, he will be returning Spain in a couple of weeks.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.