They are practically the same except for the black roof, I had to look three times to find differencesThe design puts the SF90 to shame.
The SF90 is unresolved; the 296 GTB figures out the ideal form. I don't like the SF90's design, whereas I think the 296 is the best-designed mid-engine Ferrari since the 360 Modena.They are practically the same except for the black roof, I had to look three times to find differences
![]()
![]()
They are practically the same except for the black roof, I had to look three times to find differences
Indeed, best looking post-Pininfarina series Ferrari design as well.The SF90 is unresolved; the 296 GTB figures out the ideal form. I don't like the SF90's design, whereas I think the 296 is the best-designed mid-engine Ferrari since the 360 Modena.
Yup, 296 looks more cohesive and sinewy whereas the SF90 looks more haphazard and relatively bloated for a Ferrari.The SF90 is unresolved; the 296 GTB figures out the ideal form. I don't like the SF90's design, whereas I think the 296 is the best-designed mid-engine Ferrari since the 360 Modena.
Incredible what a few adjustments here and there, some black paint can do since the master lines are almost tracedYup, 296 looks more cohesive and sinewy whereas the SF90 looks more haphazard and relatively bloated for a Ferrari.
Indeed. For the last purebred Ferrari, design-wise, we must go all the way back to the F12 Berlinetta--the last of the Pininfarinas.Yup, 296 looks more cohesive and sinewy whereas the SF90 looks more haphazard and relatively bloated for a Ferrari.
When I saw it I though its the new Lotus Emira.296 is underwhelming in person and needs a good spec.
Moments ago I saw for the first time 296 GTB. I think it looks awesome in person!
![]()
![]()
![]()
For me this is the most beautiful Ferrari since the 458.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.