SCOTT27
Drift Dynamo
And so the hatred commences , hardly surprising since most were consumed by the Chris Bangle Design era.
As before I have discussed the current situation within BMW. Marketing exercises known as Vanity projects have been replaced by further development within " BMW Efficient Dynamics" Why?
Sustainability and the ability to produce cars that can be efficient and well within restrictions for the future.
We want to be on the road when everyone else is being forced off.
The future is not all hybrids although each BMW model will feature an Active Hybrid model starting with the X6 , X5 and 7er this will eventually spread through the PAS,5er,3er, 1er etc.
More developments are on the way under Efficient Dynamics that will make regular petrol models meet their targets.
Right now the focus is on the image generated by small premium cars such as the rise in success of the 1er products which will also follow through with the X1 and in the next generation model with a Z2 Roadster and a variant under the forthcoming Progressive Activity Sedan.
Surprisingly now BMW have returned to the shelf regarding the current 1er and will launch alternative models aimed at keeping the small premium BMW line intact until the next generation.
Again I repeat the plans for the CSL models radically changed when Efficient Dynamics became the priority , Lightweight materials although the norm were the main consideration but now advances in Efficient Dynamics will effectively become the main talking point for BMW's M-Division. The new plans for the M3 CSL will showcase the lightweight ideas for the future and the technology.
The first BMW car that will use KERS Technology will be a model from M-Division, as of now that technology is work in progress and as of now our engineers are making great progress in sorting out the glitches , But it will be ready and available one day. The M3 CSL was the first model expected to be the groundbreaking BMW to receive this technology but the technology is still very much in development and in infancy.
To launch a CSL today would be counter-productive to the current car when our talking point would be the PS output. But we like to bring lots more to the conversation and as of now we cannot.
Maybe I am getting tired of repeating myself but seldom few take the message that M-Division will become the absolute "pinacle" of Efficient Dynamics. There is a lot we have learned by our current M models - Lightweight materials as one , The need for better fuel consumption and larger fuel tanks , and inspired by our GINA exercise Active Aerodynamics.
Which in several BMW models today behind the kidney grille flaps open and close improving airflow - The essence of the GINA Concept today.
More the reason Why? Why change the direction? Why not follow the competitors? Why not produce a Vanity project like this manufacturer?
Some people do not understand that BMW is not like any other manufacturer we want each product to be a typical BMW whether it is a SAV or Roadster , Touring or indeed a progressive Activity Sedan It still remains a BMW so there would be no sacrifice in typical BMW attributes.
Today we are accustomising to what will happen and preparing ourselves to what is over the horizon, Will The world head into recession? we do not know but current climate is not so clear.
For now it's sustainability and what we are doing is gearing up to that, tomorrow however is another day.
I would not say that we are being (Gay?) as someone harshly put it , But being more sensible with comments like "Efficient Dynamics" and the Hydrogen 7 project is just marketing by our rivals. Suggests that our success in this area is getting to them , We focused on environmental developments first when they were focusing on beating BMW .
When you actually realise they have not.
As before I have discussed the current situation within BMW. Marketing exercises known as Vanity projects have been replaced by further development within " BMW Efficient Dynamics" Why?
Sustainability and the ability to produce cars that can be efficient and well within restrictions for the future.
We want to be on the road when everyone else is being forced off.
The future is not all hybrids although each BMW model will feature an Active Hybrid model starting with the X6 , X5 and 7er this will eventually spread through the PAS,5er,3er, 1er etc.
More developments are on the way under Efficient Dynamics that will make regular petrol models meet their targets.
Right now the focus is on the image generated by small premium cars such as the rise in success of the 1er products which will also follow through with the X1 and in the next generation model with a Z2 Roadster and a variant under the forthcoming Progressive Activity Sedan.
Surprisingly now BMW have returned to the shelf regarding the current 1er and will launch alternative models aimed at keeping the small premium BMW line intact until the next generation.
Again I repeat the plans for the CSL models radically changed when Efficient Dynamics became the priority , Lightweight materials although the norm were the main consideration but now advances in Efficient Dynamics will effectively become the main talking point for BMW's M-Division. The new plans for the M3 CSL will showcase the lightweight ideas for the future and the technology.
The first BMW car that will use KERS Technology will be a model from M-Division, as of now that technology is work in progress and as of now our engineers are making great progress in sorting out the glitches , But it will be ready and available one day. The M3 CSL was the first model expected to be the groundbreaking BMW to receive this technology but the technology is still very much in development and in infancy.
To launch a CSL today would be counter-productive to the current car when our talking point would be the PS output. But we like to bring lots more to the conversation and as of now we cannot.
Maybe I am getting tired of repeating myself but seldom few take the message that M-Division will become the absolute "pinacle" of Efficient Dynamics. There is a lot we have learned by our current M models - Lightweight materials as one , The need for better fuel consumption and larger fuel tanks , and inspired by our GINA exercise Active Aerodynamics.
Which in several BMW models today behind the kidney grille flaps open and close improving airflow - The essence of the GINA Concept today.
More the reason Why? Why change the direction? Why not follow the competitors? Why not produce a Vanity project like this manufacturer?
Some people do not understand that BMW is not like any other manufacturer we want each product to be a typical BMW whether it is a SAV or Roadster , Touring or indeed a progressive Activity Sedan It still remains a BMW so there would be no sacrifice in typical BMW attributes.
Today we are accustomising to what will happen and preparing ourselves to what is over the horizon, Will The world head into recession? we do not know but current climate is not so clear.
For now it's sustainability and what we are doing is gearing up to that, tomorrow however is another day.
I would not say that we are being (Gay?) as someone harshly put it , But being more sensible with comments like "Efficient Dynamics" and the Hydrogen 7 project is just marketing by our rivals. Suggests that our success in this area is getting to them , We focused on environmental developments first when they were focusing on beating BMW .
When you actually realise they have not.


