Vs AutoZeitung: Audi TT 3.2 Q vs BMW 135i Coupe


KokkenTor

Precision Pilot
Messages
403
Audi/BMW

Price (€): 40950/38950
Hp: 250/306
Nm: 320/400
Weight (kg): 1518/1612
0-100km/h: 5.3/5.2
0-180km/h: 16,8/15,4
Lap-time: 1:47,3/1:46,9
Slalom (km/h): 64.5/65,2
Breaking 100km/h-0, cold (m): 37,4/35,9
Breaking 100km/h-0, warm (m): 36,2/34,7
Noise 100km/h (dB(A)): 66/63
Consumption (l/100km): 13,0/12,3

Test points:
Body: 509/541
Comfort: 630/678
Engine/gear: 713/726
Driving dynamics: 704/725
Costs: 361/364
Total: 2917/3034

1. BMW 135i Coupe – 3 034 points
2. Audi TT 3.2 Quattro – 2 917 points
 
I still think the TT should be compared to Z4. The 1er has an advantage in comfort and interior space due to the fact it's a different type of car.
 
I still think the TT should be compared to Z4. The 1er has an advantage in comfort and interior space due to the fact it's a different type of car.

But the TT should have had an advantage in performance being a sports car but it doesn't - by a big margin. 135 beats the TT in a straight line, around the track, on the slalom, in breaking and heck even fuel consumption and it costs less. Talk about superior technology.
 
My question is: If they had compared TT 2.0 TFSI to 120i which car would had won?

95% of the TT and the 1 series coupe sold will be with the smaller engines and there Audi has the clear advantage.
 
My question is: If they had compared TT 2.0 TFSI to 120i which car would had won?

I've personally driven both those cars you mention and in my book 120i Hatchback is a winner becuase the 120i is cheaper, more practical and having better comfort ;)
I wouldnt even consider either a TT or 1er, two completly different cars and they are aiming for a different crowd.
Its either Z4 or TT becuase they are both unpractical and roadsters, or its a 120i or a Golf.
 
havent anyone noticed that they meassured the TT 0-100km/h in 5.3 seconds. I have never seen such good time before, not even Z4 3.0is is that fast. I think around 6.0 seconds are more common for this TT.
Is it a typo or is TT 3.2 really that fast? :confused:
 
I've personally driven both those cars you mention and in my book 120i Hatchback is a winner becuase the 120i is cheaper, more practical and having better comfort

And the TT is faster , has better quality and it's sportier.:D

But you are right TT and 1 series coupe shouldn't be compared at all. Much different cars.
 
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI probably should not be compared with the 120i. That Audi starts at €32,750. 120i 3-door hatch, even with M-Sport package will be €28,700. At the Audi's price bracket, it's best to compare the 130i, €33,500. That gives 265 PS (vs 200), 0-100kmh in 6.0 (vs 6.6), +6mph on the top end, and will do some things the Audi won't. And with less mass over the front wheels (no turbo, no intercooler, magnesium-alloy block), might have better turn-in and responses than the 135i.

 
Audi TT 2.0 TFSI probably should not be compared with the 120i. That Audi starts at €32,750. 120i 3-door hatch, even with M-Sport package will be €28,700. At the Audi's price bracket, it's best to compare the 130i, €33,500. That gives 265 PS (vs 200), 0-100kmh in 6.0 (vs 6.6), +6mph on the top end, and will do some things the Audi won't. And with less mass over the front wheels (no turbo, no intercooler, magnesium-alloy block), might have better turn-in and responses than the 135i.


You nailed it. For the price, you almost always have good chance of getting more performance with a BMW than an Audi.
 

Trending content


Back
Top