Zafiro
Supreme Roadmaster
- Messages
- 30,811
WOW good for you then
Comparison tests AutoBild Sportscars - RS7 Sportback vs M6 GC Competition vs CLS63 AMG-S vs Panamera Turbo
- Thread starter DeDe
- Start date
MoSs
M-Sport Meister
- Messages
- 2,206
- Name
- Moussa
So what do u think of mercedes's new 4.0t on the amg gt. Looks like a mix between audi's 4.0t and bmw's 4.4WOW good for you then
Zafiro
Supreme Roadmaster
- Messages
- 30,811
Probably a good one. Should make the car move fast. But I doubt its going to sound as good as the old 6.2 liters engine. Next C63 is getting the same engine, going to be a close battle between M4 and C63 for sure.
ALI
Autobahn Adventurer
- Messages
- 824
ALI
Autobahn Adventurer
- Messages
- 824
Hope everything is great with you aswell, ive been checking out the page and forums this whole time but no posts at all. Im thinking of getting back on the grid, still a mercedes fanYo man! a very long time. Hope everything is great Ali
Sayyaaf
Autotechnik Ace
- Messages
- 5,246
- Name
- Mohamed
ALI
Autobahn Adventurer
- Messages
- 824
Thank you Sayyaf, Ill try to not spy as much and post a little more lol
Looks like you dont have an idea about the M6 f13
I do Drive me rs6 c7 a lot on highspeed runs on German Highways as well my M6 f13 comp pack. The M6 pulls mutch stronger over 200 km/h up to 305 km/h than rs6/7(vbox verified). The 4.4 Liter m engine combined with its 7 Speed dkg is a blast. My rs6 is better out of the box 4 Wheel and Ultra shorts low gear Ratio are top notch from a standing but for higher speed the m is way more efficient. (Weight dif from rs6 to rs7 is aprox 50kg..)
By the way latest sportcars Abt rs6-r (vs brabus e 850t) with 730 hp needs 36,7 sec up to 300 km/h where M6 is in stock trim around 32 secs...
MoSs
M-Sport Meister
- Messages
- 2,206
- Name
- Moussa
Ive never raced an m6 from 200 to 300 km/h, and probably ill never have the chance to race the m6 from 200 to 300 km/h because its hard to find room to reach such speeds. But ill tell u one thing for sure, the rs7 will be miles ahead by the time the m6 catches it, especially with software tune, since ur comparing the rs6 to the m6 cp, i have a software tune on my audi rs7 and ive raced an m5 cp (a friends car) role on start on pump fuel 91 octane. From about 40 mph, as soon as we stepped on the gas my car pulled 2/3 cars on him then i dissapeared, i think he has xpipe on his or something. The rs7 with apr tune has become famous, u can see that on youtube, with stage 2 its doing mid 10's, ive never seen an m5 or m6 stage 2 or 3 doing that or anywhere close. And thats just a software tune, what im trying to say is that the 4.0t has much more potential then bmw's 4.4
why are you comparing tuned audi to regular bmw?
- Messages
- 13,230
MoSs
M-Sport Meister
- Messages
- 2,206
- Name
- Moussa
Because hes comparing a tuned audi to a stock m6
MoSs
M-Sport Meister
- Messages
- 2,206
- Name
- Moussa
Lol right?I think you broke physics!
@MoSs i see it completly different. Both my M6 cp and rs6 c7 are stock. I know for my cars that the M6 cp pulls way better above 200kmh than the rs6.
The water air colling of the m 4.4 Liter is very efficient on High Speeds.
Now if it comes to tunning, pp performance m5 do Runs 25 sec up to 300kmh with blackbox and cat delete. I do think for minor mode that is very good. Despite the fact that the ecu of the m5/6 were not completly craked and the power comes from biggy pack.
For quarter miles i cant speek as i do not have apropriete race track,
but for sure as i stated allready out of the box my rs6 is faster than the M6 due to the 4
Wheel Drive and ultra short low gear Ratio.
M6 keeping up with aventador
The water air colling of the m 4.4 Liter is very efficient on High Speeds.
Now if it comes to tunning, pp performance m5 do Runs 25 sec up to 300kmh with blackbox and cat delete. I do think for minor mode that is very good. Despite the fact that the ecu of the m5/6 were not completly craked and the power comes from biggy pack.
For quarter miles i cant speek as i do not have apropriete race track,
but for sure as i stated allready out of the box my rs6 is faster than the M6 due to the 4
Wheel Drive and ultra short low gear Ratio.
M6 keeping up with aventador
MoSs
M-Sport Meister
- Messages
- 2,206
- Name
- Moussa
Ur not getting my point m-ch, ive never raced an m6 cp from 200km/h to 300km/h and now that my rs7 is tunned itll be pointless, what im trying to say and been trying to say is that with just an ecu tune ur getting 162 more to the crank and thats a crazy number, all it costs is 2k or 3k, without adding other mods like exhausts or air intake. I totally respect ur opninion about the comparison bettween both ur rs6 and ur m6 cp but they both are totally different, and i bet u if u race both the rs7 and rs6 to 300 km/h the rs7 will win it due to better aerodynamics, and dont forget that the rs6 loses more power to the wheels then the m6 because of the power delivery to all 4 wheels. Rwd cars are normally faster then awd cars on long runs. Pp-performance has done a good job to the new m6 but whatever apr did to the rs7 is magic. Heres a vid of the m6 with pp-performance stage 2 vs the old rs6 and the rs7 stage 2 vs the 997.2 turbo stage 2. Like that u can compare times.
Hahaha, LOL!!!!!
Could you tell me yours times 100-200km/h for the stock RS7?
I have stock M6 Comp f13 and 6.6-6.4s 100-200km/h zero slope
Can confirme your Times Running simualar with my m6 cp in stock trim(6.3-6.8) My rs6 in stock trim is around 7.6-8.4 but quicker out of the box. Both car just me on board same highway, different days
