do someone recall if the results for the W203 was this good at debut against the previous 3er..
i cant remember really
I remember when W203 debuted it was praised being "besser als 3er". Everybody loved "kleine S-Klasse".
Nothing much changed during the years: BMW is praised for agility & driver involvement, MB for space & comfort, Audi for offering a bit of bot worlds - therefore being best all-rounder & best value for money (also due best fit & finish).
Regarding latest test: I'm sure BMW lost points in traditional categories like ergonomics (iDrive), interior space, boot space, variability, sitting comfort, ride comfort (suspension) & warranty.
So, nothing new here.
The only BMW model that was beaten by competition in BMW won field was E65 7er - for not being as agile as A8. Otherwise BMW still deliver better agility & driver involvement as MB, Audi. Lexus etc - and this is a promise of BMW brand. So, if wanting best luxury car BMW is definitely not the car for you: go for MB, Lexus or Audi. Want a car to drive & have fun driving it: go for BMW. And that's BMW's selling point, and not "we are the best luxury car". Even more: most traditional luxury buyers don't even consider to buy BMW since BMWs are not comfortable enough. Therefore Reithofer's task is also to position BMW as more luxury brand while not losing traditional BMW characteristics (agility, driver involvement, fun to drive) & customers who buy BMW for their traditional values.
Mind that BMW have always been considered as a niche brand: for sporty oriented luxury buyers only. An alternative brand. So the fact BMW have overtaken MB is even more sensational in this regard. Naturally - by nature of their products - MB, Lexus & Audi have broader customer base available: more traditional luxury buyers. Being more mainstream products. While eg. BMW, Maserati ,Jaguar & Infiniti are considerd as more niche brand / products with their emphasized sportiness over comfort - occupying only a small part of luxury segment.
