F1 2014 Singapore GP

Formula 1 news, races, teams, drivers, technology, strategy, and discussion.

Bartek S.

Aerodynamic Ace
Messages
8,299
8e45482a6648714df9d133aca60f799b.webp


Singapore
Race Date:21 Sep 2014
Circuit Name:Marina Bay Street Circuit
First Grand Prix:2008
Number of Laps:61
Circuit Length:5.065 km
Race Distance:308.828 km
Lap Record:
1:48.574 - S Vettel (2013)

8e9944434ac5f2877d1df7ac4a4d3bc2.webp


FIA clarifies radio transmission restrictions

Formula One racing’s governing body, the FIA, has provided the teams with a detailed list of the types of pit-to-car radio messages that will and won’t be allowed from this weekend’s 2014 Formula 1 Singapore Airlines Singapore Grand Prix onwards.

It follows last week’s directive which advised that any radio transmissions including information related to the performance of the car or driver would be considered a contravention of Article 20.1 of the sporting regulations. This states that "the driver must drive the car alone and unaided”.

The move follows recent media scrutiny about the amount of information being given to drivers by their race engineers, particularly in terms of how they can gain lap time.

Among the message types now banned - either by radio or pit board - include information about a competitor’s sector times, information on the level of fuel saving needed, any coded messages, and answering a direct technical question from a driver such as "Am I using the right torque map?"

Certain message types, such as information on tyre pressures and temperatures and brake wear and temperatures, will only be prohibited from the next round of the championship in Japan in order to give teams time to adapt to the changes.

The full list is as follows:

Message types allowed
- Acknowledgement that a driver message has been heard.
- Lap or sector time detail.
- Lap time detail of a competitor.
- Gaps to a competitor during a practice session or race.
- "Push hard", "push now", "you will be racing xx" or similar.
- Helping with warning of traffic during a practice session or race.
- Giving the gaps between cars in qualifying so as to better position the car for a clear lap.
- Puncture warning.
- Tyre choice at the next pit stop.
- Number of laps a competitor has done on a set of tyres during a race.
- Tyre specification of a competitor.
- Indication of a potential problem with a competitor's car during a race.
- Information concerning a competitors likely race strategy.
- Yellow flags, blue flags, Safety Car deployment or other cautions.

Message types not allowed
- Sector time detail of a competitor and where a competitor is faster or slower.
- Adjustment of power unit settings.
- Adjustment of power unit setting to de-rate the systems.
- Adjustment of gearbox settings.
- Learning of gears of the gearbox (will only be enforced from the Japanese Grand Prix onwards).
- Balancing the SOC [state-of-charge of batteries] or adjusting for performance.
- Information on fuel flow settings (except if requested to do so by race control).
- Information on level of fuel saving needed.
- Information on tyre pressures or temperatures (will only be enforced from the Japanese Grand Prix onwards).
- Information on differential settings.
- Start maps related to clutch position, for race start and pit stops.
- Information on clutch maps or settings, e.g. bite point.
- Burn-outs prior to race starts.
- Information on brake balance or BBW (brake-by-wire) settings.
- Warning on brake wear or temperatures (will only be enforced from the Japanese Grand Prix onwards).
- Selection of driver default settings (other than in the case of a clearly identified problem with the car).
- Answering a direct question from a driver, e.g. "Am I using the right torque map"?
- Any message that appears to be coded.

http://www.formula1.
 
Warning on brake wear or temperatures (will only be enforced from the Japanese Grand Prix onwards)

Why did FIA request this to be banned? I thought it is fairly important for the drivers to know the state of their brakes, even though they can probably judge by the feel of the car.
 
FIA agrees to delay parts of F1 radio clampdown after team meeting

The FIA has decided to delay a total clampdown on team radio messages in Formula 1 until the start of next year, but any effort to help a driver with his own performance is still banned with immediate effect.
The governing body has agreed to a compromise following concerns expressed by teams to F1 race director Charlie Whiting during a meeting on Thursday about technical and safety implications of new limits imposed on messages to drivers.

In a note sent to teams on Friday morning, the FIA said it accepted the technical complexity of 2014 cars meant outlawing any messages about car changes could have unintended consequences.
There was particular concern over drivers being informed about the state of batteries and energy recovery systems, plus the lack of warning they could have about safety items such as brakes.

Concerns were also raised over teams that had opted for a smaller steering wheel information display being at more of a disadvantage from the changes than outfits with bigger screens.
The FIA notice said: "Any list of restrictions imposed at short notice will have a significantly different effect from team-to-team."

After accepting the clampdown could cause problems, the FIA said it would delay the ban on information relating to the performance of the car until 2015 - as that will give teams more time to prepare properly.
However, the FIA made it clear that any information from teams regarding a drivers' performance is still banned. Any breach would result in a team being reported to the race stewards.

The FIA has clarified messages that it will deem to be against the rules, whether delivered by radio or pitboard:
* Driving lines on the circuit
* Contact with kerbs
* Car set-up parameters for specific corners
* Comparative or absolute sector time detail of another driver
* Speeds in corners compared to another driver
* Gear selection compared with another driver
* Gear selection in general
* Braking points
* Rate of braking compared to another driver
* Rate of braking or application of brakes in general
* Car stability under braking
* Throttle application compared to another driver
* Throttle application in general
* Use of DRS compares with another driver
* Use of any overtake button
* Driving technique in general

autosport
 
Very close qualifying today, from Q1 to Q3 ! It looked as if anyone in the top eight could have taken pole today.
 
e73bb8e312ad3264dc9075de21d42140.webp


Qual.

Pos Driver Car Time Gap
1. Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1m45.681s -
2. Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1m45.688s 0.007s
3. Daniel Ricciardo Red Bull/Renault 1m45.854s 0.173s
4. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull/Renault 1m45.902s 0.221s
5. Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1m45.907s 0.226s
6. Felipe Massa Williams/Mercedes 1m46.000s 0.319s
7. Kimi Raikkonen Ferrari 1m46.170s 0.489s
8. Valtteri Bottas Williams/Mercedes 1m46.187s 0.506s
9. Kevin Magnussen McLaren/Mercedes 1m46.250s 0.569s
10. Daniil Kvyat Toro Rosso/Renault 1m47.362s 1.681s
11. Jenson Button McLaren/Mercedes 1m46.943s 1.262s
12. Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso/Renault 1m46.989s 1.308s
13. Nico Hulkenberg Force India/Mercedes 1m47.308s 1.627s
14. Esteban Gutierrez Sauber/Ferrari 1m47.333s 1.652s
15. Sergio Perez Force India/Mercedes 1m47.575s 1.894s
16. Romain Grosjean Lotus/Renault 1m47.812s 2.131s
17. Adrian Sutil Sauber/Ferrari 1m48.324s 2.643s
18. Pastor Maldonado Lotus/Renault 1m49.063s 3.382s
19. Jules Bianchi Marussia/Ferrari 1m49.440s 3.759s
20. Kamui Kobayashi Caterham/Renault 1m50.405s 4.724s
21. Max Chilton Marussia/Ferrari 1m50.473s 4.792s
22. Marcus Ericsson Caterham/Renault 1m52.287s 6.606s
 
It is surprising to see Mercedes, the team which spent the most money, time and resources, and the team which has done the most laps in testing is still struggling with car reliability.
 
e61a7aa1bbb09c6892bc3ccebfc5b7d9.webp


Race

1 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 2h00m04.795s
2 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 13.534s
3 Daniel Ricciardo Red Bull 14.273s
4 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 15.389s
5 Felipe Massa Williams 42.161s
6 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 56.801s
7 Sergio Perez Force India 59.038s
8 Kimi Raikkonen Ferrari 1m00.641s
9 Nico Hulkenberg Force India 1m01.661s
10 Kevin Magnussen McLaren 1m02.230s
11 Valtteri Bottas Williams 1m05.065s
12 Pastor Maldonado Lotus 1m06.915s
13 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1m08.029s
14 Daniil Kvyat Toro Rosso 1m12.008s
15 Marcus Ericsson Caterham 1m34.188s
16 Jules Bianchi Marussia 1m34.543s
17 Max Chilton Marussia 1 Lap

Ret.

Jenson Button lap 52
Adrian Sutil 40
Esteban Gutierrez 17
Nico Rosberg 13
Kamui Kobayashi 0
 
Drivers' championship
Pos Driver Points
1. Lewis Hamilton 241
2. Nico Rosberg 238
3. Daniel Ricciardo 181
4. Fernando Alonso 133
5. Sebastian Vettel 124
6. Valtteri Bottas 122
7. Jenson Button 72
8. Nico Hulkenberg 72
9. Felipe Massa 65
10. Sergio Perez 45
11. Kimi Raikkonen 45
12. Kevin Magnussen 39
13. Jean-Eric Vergne 19
14. Romain Grosjean 8
15. Daniil Kvyat 8
16. Jules Bianchi 2
17. Adrian Sutil 0
18. Marcus Ericsson 0
19. Pastor Maldonado 0
20. Esteban Gutierrez 0
21. Max Chilton 0
22. Kamui Kobayashi 0

Constructors' championship

Pos Constructor Points
1. Mercedes 479
2. Red Bull/Renault 305
3. Williams/Mercedes 187
4. Ferrari1 78
5. Force India/Mercedes 117
6. McLaren/Mercedes 111
7. Toro Rosso/Renault 27
8. Lotus/Renault 8
9. Marussia/Ferrari 2
10. Sauber/Ferrari 0
11. Caterham/Renault 0
 
A pity that viewers were denied what could have been a monumental battle between Hamilton and Rosberg.

That being said, Lewis has also had his share of unfortunate technical gremlins. I hope that the two can fight it out on equal footing sans technical defects in the remaining 5 races.
 
I can have opinion and I don't think I'm A grade moron like some other people having different opinions.
It was just a thought. If I insulted someone, I'm sorry. By.
 
I can have opinion and I don't think I'm A grade moron like some other people having different opinions.
It was just a thought. If I insulted someone, I'm sorry. By.
There is no need to apologies, I think Betty's comment isn't directed at you, it was just a passing comment.
 
I can have opinion and I don't think I'm A grade moron like some other people having different opinions.
It was just a thought. If I insulted someone, I'm sorry. By.

I actually assumed your comment was tongue-in-cheek.

As a vet, I'm pretty damn sure you're not a moron. I'm also pretty sure you don't genuinely think Rosberg's bad luck in Singapore is the team deliberately favouring Lewis, any more than when Lewis had bad luck it was the team favouring Rosberg.
 

Trending content


Back
Top