- Messages
- 1,249
All cars were driven reviews like previous ecoty competitions.Is the Mclaren 750S a driving review or instrumented test do you know?![]()
All cars were driven reviews like previous ecoty competitions.Is the Mclaren 750S a driving review or instrumented test do you know?![]()
All cars were driven reviews like previous ecoty competitions.
Very surprising it is over 3sec slower than the Radical when they have similar power and weight. Something doesnt seem right with the test vehicle. Did they do acceleration runs? The claimed time to 100 is 3.4sec.KTM GT-XR continues to underwhelm
![]()
I don't find the result particularly surprising. It's 1200kg, which is not spectacular for a car that is this stripped. The Radical is more like 1000kg and has a lot more aero. Sport Auto and Autobild both tested the car and got 3.5s to 100km/h, so the problem is not with the engine or the acceleration. It's just that the aero and the setup overall are nothing special and the cornering speeds are pretty mediocre.Very surprising it is over 3sec slower than the Radical when they have similar power and weight. Something doesnt seem right with the test vehicle. Did they do acceleration runs? The claimed time to 100 is 3.4sec.
It's crazy how GT-XR is the second most expensive car on this chart after Senna (going by a quick base price google). It really should be placing higher in these track tests, since KTM's whole shtick with this model is how it's just a couple alterations away from its racing version.I don't find the result particularly surprising. It's 1200kg, which is not spectacular for a car that is this stripped. The Radical is more like 1000kg and has a lot more aero. Sport Auto and Autobild both tested the car and got 3.5s to 100km/h, so the problem is not with the engine or the acceleration. It's just that the aero and the setup overall are nothing special and the cornering speeds are pretty mediocre.
You would - and should - expect more for €370k, that's for sure, though. This is more like a €100k car if anything.
So that's about (for the E-Ray):
0-100 kph in 3,3 s
0-160 kph in 6,2 s
0-200 kph in 10,2 s
Not soooo fantastic.![]()
Yes, but I wanted to write 3.0 seconds...Based purely off that data panel?
More like 2.7/6.0/10.2 which is pretty great. Although is does slow down after 200 it seems.
Yes, but I wanted to write 3.0 seconds...
0-60mph without rollout is about 2.8. Add another two tenth for the 97-100 kph gap. That 3.0 s.
Donkervoort F22 | WORLD RECORD 2.3G Lateral G-Force! - 1YR Anniversary
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.