Swedish AMS: Audi A6 3.0 TDi vs BMW 530d vs Jaguar XF 3.0D vs Merc E350 CDi 4Matic


Mr Robert

Kraftwagen König
In the lastest issue, Swedish AMS compares the Audi A6 3.0 TDi Quattro (man), BMW 530d (aut), Jaguar XF 3.0D (aut) and Mercedes E350 CDi 4-Matic (aut).

AMS ranks them as follows:

1. BMW 530d
2f77da1628e8e371739fb25896f3c440.webp


2. Audi A6 3.0 TDi
19784c8769437b56e04442ffd0a86df1.webp


3. Mercedes E350 CDi
40299f315d974d724ff658d1a10d4565.webp


4. Jaguar XF 3.0D
d9a240a7174cf0b35907e2c7054c9038.webp


The usual "BMW for the driver", "Audi for the interior space", "Mercedes for allroud ability and quality" and "Jaguar for the effort" applies to this review as well as some rather interesting notes.

For instance; the BMW is by far the most comfortable, the Jaguar's ride is too firm for bad roads and the BMW is the cheapest to run. The Audi is a long time favourite of the Swedish AMS crew and they find that it still is a really good car.

Other than that, this test seems to focus more on comfort than on sport, which of course is the right thing to do given the size and direction of the vehicles.

This is a really good review for the 5-series as the test crew finds that it beats the competition in every respect in the special "luxury car" category.
 
Are there any acceleration data ?
Would like to know whether new 30d engine gives 5er any edge over rivals.
 
Are there any acceleration data ?
Would like to know whether new 30d engine gives 5er any edge over rivals.

The test was done in the winter (like just recently) and, therefore, I think they did not make any acceleration tests of their own.
 
Klier, you clearly don't get 4 1/2 stars for interior space alone. Extremely pleased to see BMW on top with comfort and sport prowess. If the BMW is more comfortable then the E Class, I don't think I'll be getting back into a Mercedes this generation...
 

Thread statistics

Created
Mr Robert,
Last reply from
Potential,
Replies
7
Views
4,050

Trending content

Latest posts


Back
Top