![]()
![]()
Credit: mr.grey_4k
One thing BMW should have asked Toyota for in return for the engines was TNGA-F platform. Instead they asked for the stupid hydrogen vaporware!
I wonder if X7 will get the Concertina Theatre Screen?
Or a BMWfied "LX600" which would have been a semi credible comp to G class.Ahh yes, I can't wait for the next gen of those typical BMW pick-ups.
Or a BMWfied "LX600" which would have been a semi credible comp to G class.
Not a question of can or cannot, but one of cost and reward.Or they try to make a credible platform of their own, if they wanted to enter this (lucrative) market.
The G class is no rocket science. BMW can do that too.
Not a question of can or cannot, but one of cost and reward.
The G class is no rocket science. BMW can do that too.
Is it really? In 2024, in US, Mercedes sold ~10k G class, Lexus sold ~7k LX. Meanwhile BMW sold 30k X7! So the market for off road capable, luxo SUV is still a niche one.I get that, but we're talking about a gigantic market,
The G is "iconic" because it's been the same for generations, any new contender can't bring that.
Is it really? In 2024, in US, Mercedes sold ~10k G class, Lexus sold ~7k LX. Meanwhile BMW sold 30k X7! So the market for off road capable, luxo SUV is still a niche one.
The same look.
The current W463 is from 2018 and I see zero reason for BMW not to be able to make something similar or better tech wise.
For the rest, I disagree with your whole premise. People can easily flock to something entirely new if it's really outstanding.
Come to the UK, hardly anyone is buying the G for anything other than it's image....
It sells because of it's established imaged, the Range Rover is exactly the same.
It's a waste of money for BMW to look at. They don't sustain anything above the 7-er level for more than one generation.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.