Random Thoughts...

Yesterday we had 30C and I went for coffee with some friends. When I tried to leave, my old Clio behaved weirdly. The symptom was that it refused to start. After we tore down the distributor to exclude issues with the spark plugs, we tried our luck with the fuel pump. After hitting it with a wrench a few times while shouting "start you SOB" the engine started. It appears that body and verbal violence does work in such cases!

:) :D

Yeah, the French really respond well to that! :D
 
A psychic`s vision from 33 years ago on coming world events. Pretty interesting...

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I love Lawrence Krauss. As a drop out this really makes me want to go back to school!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
WOW!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Not enough free time for GCF, or any internet activities for me lately. My work time is from 8.30am to 9.30pm the last two weeks, which leaves me only two hours before I end up dead on my bed, which I spend drinking beer with a couple of friends. I hope it won't be so for much longer, since this is how working freelance goes, but I don't really complain. It's good to have work in such dark time, plus I feel so alive!

I hope to be more active, soon!
 
Went to test drive Alfa Mito and Giulietta today and came a bit disappointed: they drive nice, but far from Alfas of yore, and more like a maistream car like a Golf, Megane or Hyundai I30. In fact, refinement on Giulietta surprised me, but I was wishing more sportiness. The ride on Mito was a bit harsh. The Multiair engines on both are simply wonderful.
Interior wise the Mito is a complete let down, even the Fiat Punto and Bravo look more modern, and while Giulietta is nicer, again, it doesn't shine compared to a Golf or Megane and I guess the new Peugeot 308 is going to wipe the floor with it, if the 208 and 508 are anything to go by. On the plus side, the leather on the seats felt exquisite and better than many german premiums ;)

The biggest letdown though, was the prescense of a 159 in the showroom which only highlighted how ugly the new Alfa design language is. The pig face is unbecoming compared to Giugiaro's masterwork. As much as I like the new A3 sedan, I think the 159 is the nicest FWD car ever.
 
Ι almost blew up my Clio on Monday. I was driving up a mountain, not that far from downtown and I got somewhat obsessed with a few bends, which resulted in the engine working around 4500 rpm for a considerable amount of time. Apparently the water pump wasn't very happy about it and (literally) exploded. Luckily I instantly saw the temperature gauge quickly pointing towards the "oh shit" direction and switched off the engine. A loud-ish noise from the front was also a good hint that something broke.

Later that night, I came back with a friend, 20l of distilled water for the cooling system and enough material to spend our time during the necessary stops that we were about to make every few minutes for the engine to cool, as I decided that it was a hell of a good idea to drive the car to the service garage. Which I actually did. (I had done the same when I blew up the flange)

Given the opportunity I also replaced the belts, a spring under the gear lever that had broken (now the gear changes have a less awful feel - factory crappy level), an oil change and something else that I can't remember right now. Oh, and a new water pump.

And all that for just 180€.

:)
 
Had a flat tyre this morning. The spare was flat, too :D

31122013(001).webp 31122013.webp

And then I had a flat with the Volvo, too! Talk about 2013 saying a nice goodbye :D
 
On a completely different sidenote, I drove a Peugeot 107 yesterday. It was a 5-door one with the 3-cylinder 900cc engine. I will describe it with only one word: BRILLIANT!

The car belongs to a friend, and it was what drove us around Athens shortly after we said goodbye to 2013, and started the old tradition of exploring the nightlife of our capital city to the absolute maximum. As I was the only one who didn't live there, I had arrived to Athens just at 10pm, after a 2h drive and so I hadn't caught up with my friends who had started with wine before I left my home. So, I was to be the designated driver up until this was legal. The car was this 107. The scenery, downtown Athens. Starting from 1.30am of January first.

At first we were two, then three and eventually five grown-up, full sized, handsome adults. The car felt like a Playmobil at first, acceptable with three people and struggling with five guys on board. It was actually surprisingly nimble and agile, allowing me to really enjoy waving through the traffic, while crossing the historic centre of an ancient city, ruined by modern civilization. While the clutch, brake and gas pedals felt very light and not communicative at all, as did the gear lever and to a lesser degree, the steering, I found this 107 to be quite fun. It was so easy to maneuvre and the tiny engine had a nice "spark", as I felt it to be very "alive" (as opposed to lethargic to rev), something that was matched by an equally alive engine noise. During the time I spent behind the wheel, I felt very engaged, not because of the feedback of the car's controls, but because of the overall experience of total control of it. Being not very good with words, let alone words from a language I lernt at a later point in my life, I find it tricky to describe the way the 107 engaged me.

Comparing the 107 with the Fiat Panda I used to live with up until a couple of years ago, the 107 was not as much fun. The Panda, being very narrow and tall, was adequate enough for 5 adults, yet its 1.2l I4 engine had as much as hard time as the single litre one from the 107, with five people inside. The driving experience of the 107 was more consistent though, as it behaved and maneuvered exactly as I expected it to, at any point. The Panda felt even more light and easy to use around town, but due to its dimensions, and very high CoG, you felt like you were driving flat out, even at 40 km/h. Though quite fun, this could be tiring at some point, since you could never calculate how far you are from landing on the Panda's side. I had managed two times to get two wheels of the ground, and both times I almost sh*t myself!

I characterize the 107 brilliant, because it's the cheapest city car you can buy here and for the intended use, I can't think of anything that could be done better. It's small on the outside, but small-ish inside. All controls are light enough, making it easy to operate. A probably fake sense of nerve, spark, aliveness comes from the 3cyl engine, which makes up for the lightness of the controls, and brings you a nice smile as you are stuck in traffic.

Yes, the seats could be a bit better, you could have full door moldings, instead of some plastic parts and then painted metal. You could have a proper instrument cluster including a temperature gauge (this really annoys me!). But then it would cost more. And at this price, it's by far the most value-for-money 4-wheeled thing you can buy for your everyday downtown commute.

Repeating a big part of the same route later of that day, with me driving my S60 and the 107's owner sitting right next to me, only proved my point again. For your everyday commute around and across a congested city centre you don't need anything more than an 107. Or a C1, or an Aygo.

Being a fan of cars that are designed to do one thing, and do this with success, if I was to buy a new commute-car, I would have quite a hard time deciding between this one and the Panda. The Panda is slightly more expensive, but has a proper interior, and dimensions more ideal for its use. The sensation of driving near the limit almost all the time, can be tiring, though, as its glory comes from the fact that its easy to use under the conditions its meant to be driven.

NOTE: I forgot to say something about the seating position. It's weird and kind of cramped. To most people this feels annoying, but to me it resembles the seating position of my Clio, and while far from ideal, I'm used to it. Comparing it to the Panda, it's far better, as the seating of the Panda, is closer to sitting on a bar stool, rather than a car.
 
Thanks for sharing your thoughts Giannis. I'm planning to chage my Fiat Novo Uno (the south american cousin of the Panda) with something even smaller, for using just as city car. Aygo/C1/107 is one posibility, the other one is a Fiat 500.
How was the fuel consumption? I ask you that because the FIRE family of Fiat's engine, just like to drink fuel. Refined, quiet, bullet proof but it drinks too much fuel compared to other small engines....
 
Thanks for sharing your thoughts Giannis. I'm planning to chage my Fiat Novo Uno (the south american cousin of the Panda) with something even smaller, for using just as city car. Aygo/C1/107 is one posibility, the other one is a Fiat 500.
How was the fuel consumption? I ask you that because the FIRE family of Fiat's engine, just like to drink fuel. Refined, quiet, bullet proof but it drinks too much fuel compared to other small engines....

First of all, I have no idea about the fuel consumption. There was no "trip computer" on this car, so I couldn't check. Now that you mentioned it, though, I'll call my friend tomorrow and ask him! :)

As for the F500, I'm not really a fan of it. It's too "fashion item" for me, plus the Panda is far more practical than the 500! In any case, the supermini segment has many other offerings, that I've yet to try. I still haven't driven the new Twingo, of which I am very curious. Plus there's a new Panda, which I haven't tried as well. Also I have no idea what an i10 feels like.

:)
 
Thanks again Giannis. The idea about getting a 500 or an Aygo is because the smaller size. I really don't need practicability, as I got the Megane for that. I even think about getting a Smart.... ;)
 
Thanks again Giannis. The idea about getting a 500 or an Aygo is because the samler size. I really don't need practicability, as I got the Megane for that. I even think about getting a Smart.... ;)

Practicality doesn't only have to do with the sheer size. It's about how you take advantage of the car's volume, in my opinion. To that extent, the Smart, being the closest a four wheeled vehicle can get to being a motorcycle, is one of the most practical cars on the market. But it costs too much for what it is. If I was desperate about parking and didn't care about the lack of rear seats and proper boot space, I'd get one. But I am not.

On the other hand, I despise the 500 with passion. Yes, it looks very cool and has a very high fashion value, but it is supposed to be a car. I'm not happy with the seating position and it really doesn't make good use of its interior space. Truth to be told, though, if I was looking for a car to match a certain style or "way of living", it's the cheapest one that you can buy. But I am not this type of person. I spend my day in a 24 years old Renault which needs not only a new paintjob, but a few new doors and fenders.

The only downside I find with the 107 and its likes, is that it feels too much like a tool, and too little like a car. Naked painted metal in the interior and lack of modern gizmos can be noticeable if you spend too much time in the car, which is a reason that would justify to spend more $$ to get a proper interior and a more car-like (as opposed to toy-like) feel. Then again, I'd prefer to have two cars instead of one, and I'd prefer to spend more on the other one, the one with better quality interior, bigger size, bigger engine, higher price-tag.
 
I know Giannis, but in this case I really want as small footprint as possible, as it will be my city-only car. The Novo Uno/Panda works great, but those 20cm extra over the 500 or Aygo is something I don't really need.... still, I want to see what Renault has under the sleed with the new Twingo ;)
 
Visited the 'Mother City' - Cape Town of my country for my holidays (1380km from my town in central SA) and with that visited 'The Castle' in the shade of Table Mountain, Kasteel De Goede Hoop. Build by the Dutch (Klier's forefathers:D) after Jan van Riebeeck landed here in 1652 and lived-in by Simon van der Stell & kie. all people fom the VOC. Interesting for I learned the history at school, but my first visit to what IMHO is a feat of superb engineering from 1660's!

26fa0d106cd283020b1a7d13d09948d9.webp


We stayed with friends in Rooiels bay, they have a very nice house with a AWESOME view over false-bay.
 

Attachments

Not many days ago I found myself behind the wheel of a 1994 Volkswagen Polo 1.0l. It was actually a very interesting experience, as I never had the opportunity to actually drive the competition of my own daily driver of that era, a 1990 Renault Clio.

First of all, both my Clio and that Polo came with the same equipment. Lack of assisted steering, lack of AC, lack of electric windows and electric mirrors. The Polo also had a lack of central locking, unlike my Clio.

This Polo, if I am not mistaken, is the slowest car to wear a VW badge the last many many years, but I expected it to be even slightly nervous in its feel, given the cable operated throttle butterfly (it has a Bosch Monomotronic single injector electronic injection system), unassisted clutch and steering. But it didn't. It felt as easy to drive as most modern superminis, filtering out most of my jerky moves.

On the other hand, the equally unassisted steering of my Clio is much more communicative and direct and both the gas pedal and clutch filter much less of the "mechanical stuff" that's going on under the hood. On the plus side, the driving position of the Polo was much better and lower. And it didn't bite when letting off the gas pedal mid-corner. I can't really comment about materials' quality, because there were very few plastic parts not broken in the Polo, but that has to do with how much peace did it go through all this years, something I didn't know. I'm happy I'm the one with the Clio, instead of the Polo, is what was the outcome of this short drive.

In any case, this was an interesting experience. From drives like that you realize how forward the automotive industry has gone, how much it has progress, and how much we've lost on the way.

During a conversation with a young relative (who just got his driving license about six months ago) during the holidays, I asked what was the most fun aspect of a car of this size (Polo segment) that he wanted to buy. He said "a touchscreen multimedia system". Had I been asked the same, I'd say lift-off oversteer and proper steering feel.
 
I was surfing in some really nasty black part of the internet and i have to say that some people are really different, F amputating yourself because it's a cool experience ?
 
Αnd now something completely non-automotive related: I was shocked the other day, when I took a look at the accelerograph of an earthquake that took place just three days ago at the Greek island of Kefalonia that has been struck by a series of strong earthquakes the last week. What was shocking about this earthquake was not its magnitude of 6R, but the peak acceleration of 0.67g, the biggest ground acceleration ever measured here!

Given the fact that even the most modern structures of the island were designed for a peak ground acceleration of 0.36g, it is truly an achievement of modern engineering that noone died!
 

Trending content


Back
Top