• As a reminder, this section is for civil discussions only. In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating or wishing death/physical harm, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.

[Not So] Random Thoughts...


That's Trump, not Musk.
Also, I think terrorism is something completely else than the context you're giving. This is geopolitical, not terror.

Europe should just react by making Canada a part of the Union, and then the Union can build vast military complexes in a few places in Canada. I am positively sure the U.S doesn't mind a gigantic foreign army on their borders, that's after all what they for many decades had in mind with NATO on the borders of Russia.

Make North America EU again.
Has a nice ring to it wouldn't you say?

Yes, I would quickly warm to a far more extensive alliance with Canada. Perceptions of many aspects of culture and social market economic systems are shared between Europeans and Canadians. The traditional significant intertwining of economies between the U.S. and Canada is now showing signs of unravelling, despite the close geographic proximation.
Of course, the topic is complex. But I feel that a tightening of the EU/Canada alliance could be mutually very beneficial. Actually, THE Transatlantic Alliance is NOW with Canada and Mexico rather than with the U.S. The former one with the U.S. has now been so seriously damaged that one now wonders whether it could EVER be revived in the future. Still, I am grateful for "Team Trump" giving us previously sleepy Europeans the rudest of wakeup calls. It was long overdue. And now, we have NO choice but to get our act together tout de suite and become hardcore machiavellian (which is not "very nice", but we need to serve our own interests FIRST-and screw the rest of the noise).
 
In essence, this horrific mess is the result of the ongoing slugfest between the U.S. and China. The rest of the world have become, more or less, passengers on this express train into utter calamity. An immensely uncomfortable question for the EU, Asian nations, Australia, etc will be: "Which bedfellow will be more suitable in order for us to protect our own interests ?". Once quite the obvious choice has now become more than questionable. "Trump Team" U.S.A. has transformed our most important transatlantic ally into a bonafide hostile adversary. Perhaps even more problematic and potentially toxic than China ?
 
In essence, this horrific mess is the result of the ongoing slugfest between the U.S. and China. The rest of the world have become, more or less, passengers on this express train into utter calamity. An immensely uncomfortable question for the EU, Asian nations, Australia, etc will be: "Which bedfellow will be more suitable in order for us to protect our own interests ?". Once quite the obvious choice has now become more than questionable. "Trump Team" U.S.A. has transformed our most important transatlantic ally into a bonafide hostile adversary. Perhaps even more problematic and potentially toxic than China ?
It's more than that, it's about a guy who got elected without really knowing how things work yet has a cast iron belief that he does.
 
It's more than that, it's about a guy who got elected without really knowing how things work yet has a cast iron belief that he does.

Viewing this a bit more philosophically...

This appears to be, in general, a major crux of socalled "quasi-democratic parliamentary democracies". Politics have steadily progressed into a potpourri of theatrical narratives, unsubstantiated, factually hollow populistic bluster and the apportioning of responsibilities of governance into the hands of dabbling pseudo "experts".

Could this beg the question of "technocracy" being a more favorable form of governance, despite some obvious serious reservations ? The feeling of fates being in the hands of utterly incompetent dilettants has seldom been more unsettling than is the case today.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

It is actually beginning to frighten me. Frightened by MYSELF and my own current thoughts. I was "socialized" in the spirit of a durable, sound and genuinely connected Transatlantic Alliance-the U.S. being the major North American component. But NOW, I do not think that I have EVER yearned more for a U.S. federal government administration to be the recipient of a swift, hard kick to the teeth and a very painful lesson. Scary.
 
Could this beg the question of "technocracy" being a more favorable form of governance

So under the traditional idea of technocracy that would mean putting an economics expert in charge of economic policy... these days it means putting an AI expert in charge of the AI that decides your economic policy.

No thanks.
 
So under the traditional idea of technocracy that would mean putting an economics expert in charge of economic policy... these days it means putting an AI expert in charge of the AI that decides your economic policy.

No thanks.

The virtues as well as pitfalls of technocracy and AI are quite similar. Both alleviate dilettantism and are precisely task focused. Both are devoid of compassion and empathy.
 
Apparently this is a dog plush.... The offset mouth is creeping me out
1000065252.webp
 

Trending content


Back
Top