To cope with the ridiculous loads that torquey engine imparts on the body, you’d hope the Chiron’s tub were very stiff. On that front, Bugatti promises a torsional rigidity (resistance to twisting) of 50,000 Nm per degree of twist and and a flexural rigidity (resistance to bending) of about 0.25 mm of deflection per tonne, numbers that Bugatti says are similar to those of LMP1 race cars.
@martinbo, I am definitely surprised by your glowing reaction. I figured you'd thought that this was a gigantic money-pit vanity project where funds could have been spent elsewere within VW.
Just curious. How did you feel about the Veyron when it was launched?
I absolutely love this car, which is all the more special because I was never particularly a fan of the Veyron. This is already the star of Geneva of the last five years for me, and I haven't even seen it IRL yet. That will come on Friday.
Although the design is something from the future, it wouldn't be farfetched to label this as a Veyron 2.0, no?
It very much is. LaFerrari, P1 and 918 fans might shrug off the Chiron for not being a leap in technology.
Durheimer has stated that there is no space in the car for batteries or electric motors. This suggests to me that they deemed it would be cheaper to improve the Veyron, rather than develop a whole new car.
Other hypercars are better for brutal responsiveness and agility. You can thank electric motors for that. In a car with top speed as the sole goal, electric motors would not have added to the top speed. What does however add to top speed is bigger turbos and more cooling.
The Chiron is not the car of the future. It's the ultimate car of the past that who's performance as an exclusively fossil fuel powered car will unlikely ever be eclipsed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.