Good points. I wasn't even thinking about the battery there. 1,235 PS would be pretty sweet and it is the more likely scenario, I agree.
there should be some gap between this and the 1000PS Valkyrie V12.
It would also be a huge flex on Ferrari's next halo car, which I doubt will get over 1,200 PS combined with the hybrid. Bugatti would be smashing that on NA ICE power alone, making Maranello bros seethe over ever dropping V12 in favor of V6 TT due to a tenuous WEC connection, which nobody cares about anyway
The current best power densities are around 5PS/kg, which would result in a roughly 200kg battery in the best case scenario. That's probably too big! For comparison, the battery in the SF90 is 72kg and that is good for only 220PS.
I wonder how AMG One manages to feed 489 PS from their 8.4 kWh battery... They must have really good regen. If the new Bugatti was on the same level, they'd only need about 12 kWh to cover the 3x 264 PS motors.
I guess at that point they might need to put more batteries in the space bellow passengers' feet, just like the AMG, on top of the central tunnel being filled to the brim.
I'm curious about the weight of the thing. I doubt Bugatti owners will care about ±100 kg over Chiron. It should easily be lighter than Nevera, at the very least.
Chiron's engine is said to be 436 kg. If we extrapolate Cosworth RA on to 8.3, it's 250 kg for the V16. Minus 150 kg for the battery pack... it leaves 36 kg to fill to be even. Call that a space for invertors (IDK how much those really weigh). Add 75 kg of motors and we're at 2,100 kg. There's still Chiron's AWD bits in there, so toss that out... back at 2 tons?