


No kidding!That's a bit different Scott is saying.![]()

This was the original plan set out , But as BMW management changed over the new CEO arranged a debate with the BMW board where they went over everything including change over from current production models to future production models.

Since Herr Reithofer's escalation to the top of BMW he has re-evaluated all decisions made under the previous manager mainly to keep focus on a strong and independent BMW Group which is what the ruling shareholders demand in the long term .
Re-evaluating the future Z4 was something that was completed when they analyzed sales figures from rivals to see what can stem such losses in the future. It's no secret that BMW want to expand the 1er product line to cater for the lower end of the premium market although since it's introduction in September 2004 over 200,000 have been sold not bad for a new product line from scratch. Critics might give their point that it is outsold by the Audi A3 and Mercedes-Benz A-klasse but these are second generation models they have had the established period they are also offered in 2 variants . The 1er is just until now a 5dr hatchback. An entry roadster would help fill the gap underneath the Z4 Given the transition of the Z4 to directly face the SLK .
Another item on the agenda was the subservant bowing to market requirements that are not necessary - ne the decision to transplant a manual gearbox from the 550i into the M5 Which is a total mismatch and compromises the attraction and the marketing which elaborates a great deal about the SMG Gearbox. This is why BMW have no plans to offer a manual gearbox for the M5 in Europe or therefore offer the M5 Touring in the USA.
The appearance of the M5 touring does offer one thing though...
There will be an M3 Touring.
no more coupling a superb F1 inspired engine with a manual.Finally from the mouth of a BMWer that the manual M5 was a mistake.
EnI said:M5 manual was built for US market only - because BMW NA insisted due the demand was high (yeah, Americans wanted stick in their M5 / M6; and US is the largest market for ///M cars). And AG decided to offer a "simple & cheap" solution: pairing modified old gearbox with a new S85 engine & chassis.
And the customers who wanted the manual gearbox were told the car would not be as capable as the one with SMG III, but a majority of them wanted a stick anyway. And they got it. Basically BMW were forced to built a "worse" M5 just because a quite large bunch of customers wanted so.![]()
Finally from the mouth of a BMWer that the manual M5 was a mistake.
Same as with the Ferrari F430 (or was it 360) manual.
Americans watch NASCAR not F1, so hopefullyno more coupling a superb F1 inspired engine with a manual.

hmm I really cannot stand hardtop convetables, and I would die if all convertables were hard top, to put it lightly...![]()
Why not just get the coupe version than?If I were to choose convertibles I'd prefer them to be hardtop ALL the time.![]()
Why not just get the coupe version than?
IMO hard tops (a)add way to much weight than needed and (b) not as attractive as either the coupe or the soft top, buy one or the other dont try to be both.
I can understand them in regular convertables, like on a Eos, Volvo, or even a 3er cab, but...
on sports cars like an M3, Zwhatever, Slk and what not, WHY? it is counter prdouctive.
hmm I really cannot stand hardtop convetables, and I would die if all convertables were hard top, to put it lightly...![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.