I find the 296 a little bit too wide for its relatively compact size,that said I havent seen one in person so I could be so wrong.Design is clearly subjective. I think the 296 is one of the worst looking Ferrari's is a long time. The Roma is the only prancing horse that Ive loved over the last few years. Way more misses in the design department of Ferrari than hits over the last decade.
I find the 296 a little bit too wide for its relatively compact size,that said I havent seen one in person so I could be so wrong.
It’s an illusion due to the fact that the car is so low. On the road it feels no wider than my F430.
My rank (fwiwRoma doesn’t hold a candle to 296 GTB. The latter is easily the most beautiful Ferrari in the last quarter of the century.
It is quite evident how the 360 really is starting to be forgotten…Even the 348 held out for longer in terms of popularity (looks based, as you suggested)My rank (fwiw) of the middle engined junior Ferraris:
F355
308/328
296
458
348
F8
488
.
.
F430
.
.
.
.
.
.
360
Not including SF90 which is no longer “entry mid engine” Ferrari, nor the 246 Dino, cause tec wasn’t born as a Ferrari
Me threeMy order would be exactly the same as @Gianclaudio
The Ferrari headlights of the transition era from retractable to fixed aren’t nice: F50, 360, 550 and even worse with 575 (and the 512M abomination), and I dislike how boxy and tall the rear of the 360 is, and in general, the design is too soft and bland without being properly elegantIt is quite evident how the 360 really is starting to be forgotten…Even the 348 held out for longer in terms of popularity (looks based, as you suggested)
Absolutely none.What are the prospects of retractable headlights ever returning on a Ferrari or Honda?
They were prohibited long time agoWhat are the prospects of retractable headlights ever returning on a Ferrari or Honda?
Legally prohibited?They were prohibited long time ago
Yes. Don't remember the reason exactly, but it was maybe something connected that if there is frost you can not use them in an emergency situation, like entering a tunnel for example.Legally prohibited?
Does that just cover new cars or used as well?Yes. Don't remember the reason exactly, but it was maybe something connected that if there is frost you can not use them in an emergency situation, like entering a tunnel for example.
Does that just cover new cars or used as well?
I thought that, but surely the stated risk exists regardless of age?Legislation passed after those cars were produced I wouldn't think would be backwards compatible. It'll be from the date it became Law moving forwards. Atleast that's my take.
I thought that, but surely the stated risk exists regardless of age?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.