GMA Gordon Murray T50 and T50s Niki Lauda


GMA is a British maker founded in 2017 by Gordon Murray. It builds analog, V12-powered hypercars like the T.50 and T.33. Official: GMA
The full throttle is nice, although the thing that really stands out in the video is how daily drivable the car is. It almost makes you think... Why would I ever wanna use anything else? I have no doubt the T.50 is gonna be objectively better at everything. Faster, better handling, more exciting, more usable. However, being objectively better doesn't necessarily mean it will manage to capture the same sort of magic the F1 has. A lot of that magic doesn't even necessarily have to do with the car itself. It's the whole narrative around it, the cultural significance. When the F1 came out, it was the fastest accelerating car, the fastest car, the most expensive car, the most powerful car - the most everything. It was also the only completely bespoke car (with highly quotable details like the golden engine bay lining and the super lightweight titanium toolkit). And then it won Le Mans on the first try, increasing the legend even further. The T.50 isn't gonna be any of these things. It's not gonna be the fastest, or fastest accelerating, it's not gonna be the only bespoke car anymore and it's not gonna win any races any time soon. It's just gonna be better than the F1 and hopefully the best driving experience ever as promised. If that's enough to elevate it to the status of the F1, that remains to be seen.
 
The full throttle is nice, although the thing that really stands out in the video is how daily drivable the car is. It almost makes you think... Why would I ever wanna use anything else? I have no doubt the T.50 is gonna be objectively better at everything. Faster, better handling, more exciting, more usable. However, being objectively better doesn't necessarily mean it will manage to capture the same sort of magic the F1 has. A lot of that magic doesn't even necessarily have to do with the car itself. It's the whole narrative around it, the cultural significance. When the F1 came out, it was the fastest accelerating car, the fastest car, the most expensive car, the most powerful car - the most everything. It was also the only completely bespoke car (with highly quotable details like the golden engine bay lining and the super lightweight titanium toolkit). And then it won Le Mans on the first try, increasing the legend even further. The T.50 isn't gonna be any of these things. It's not gonna be the fastest, or fastest accelerating, it's not gonna be the only bespoke car anymore and it's not gonna win any races any time soon. It's just gonna be better than the F1 and hopefully the best driving experience ever as promised. If that's enough to elevate it to the status of the F1, that remains to be seen.

Perfect distillation of the magic that is the F1 and the promise the T.50 holds.
 
Manuals are not very easy to drive when you have big drops of rpm when up/down shifting. Even with an auto blip. From first to second the drop will be around 6 k rpm. Of course, this makes it even more exiting, but only for really high skilled drivers.
 
The full throttle is nice, although the thing that really stands out in the video is how daily drivable the car is. It almost makes you think... Why would I ever wanna use anything else? I have no doubt the T.50 is gonna be objectively better at everything. Faster, better handling, more exciting, more usable. However, being objectively better doesn't necessarily mean it will manage to capture the same sort of magic the F1 has. A lot of that magic doesn't even necessarily have to do with the car itself. It's the whole narrative around it, the cultural significance. When the F1 came out, it was the fastest accelerating car, the fastest car, the most expensive car, the most powerful car - the most everything. It was also the only completely bespoke car (with highly quotable details like the golden engine bay lining and the super lightweight titanium toolkit). And then it won Le Mans on the first try, increasing the legend even further. The T.50 isn't gonna be any of these things. It's not gonna be the fastest, or fastest accelerating, it's not gonna be the only bespoke car anymore and it's not gonna win any races any time soon. It's just gonna be better than the F1 and hopefully the best driving experience ever as promised. If that's enough to elevate it to the status of the F1, that remains to be seen.
Well said.
 
The full throttle is nice, although the thing that really stands out in the video is how daily drivable the car is. It almost makes you think... Why would I ever wanna use anything else? I have no doubt the T.50 is gonna be objectively better at everything. Faster, better handling, more exciting, more usable. However, being objectively better doesn't necessarily mean it will manage to capture the same sort of magic the F1 has. A lot of that magic doesn't even necessarily have to do with the car itself. It's the whole narrative around it, the cultural significance. When the F1 came out, it was the fastest accelerating car, the fastest car, the most expensive car, the most powerful car - the most everything. It was also the only completely bespoke car (with highly quotable details like the golden engine bay lining and the super lightweight titanium toolkit). And then it won Le Mans on the first try, increasing the legend even further. The T.50 isn't gonna be any of these things. It's not gonna be the fastest, or fastest accelerating, it's not gonna be the only bespoke car anymore and it's not gonna win any races any time soon. It's just gonna be better than the F1 and hopefully the best driving experience ever as promised. If that's enough to elevate it to the status of the F1, that remains to be seen.

You are missing the point of the F1.

It has never been about being the fastest, most expensive or any objective measure for that matter. Those things are purely a byproduct of Murray's uncompromising focus on driving dynamics. The T50 follows this same philosophy.

Manuals are not very easy to drive when you have big drops of rpm when up/down shifting. Even with an auto blip. From first to second the drop will be around 6 k rpm. Of course, this makes it even more exiting, but only for really high skilled drivers.

Considering the engine can climb 22,000 rpm a second (insanity), I suspect the engine's ECU will help with managing the revs between gears.

Where did you get a drop of 6k between first and second?
 
You are missing the point of the F1.

It has never been about being the fastest, most expensive or any objective measure for that matter. Those things are purely a byproduct of Murray's uncompromising focus on driving dynamics. The T50 follows this same philosophy.



Considering the engine can climb 22,000 rpm a second (insanity), I suspect the engine's ECU will help with managing the revs between gears.

Where did you get a drop of 6k between first and second?
Usually the second gear has half the ratio of the first and at 12 000 max rpm, is logical to suppose that after reaching the 12 000 rpms in first, when shifting into second it will drop to 6000. But the biggest problem, that I suspect, will be the lack of a flywheel (otherwise 12 000 rpms and the quick rise of rpms can not be reached) which would lead to an idle of 3000 rpm. That, in its turn, would lead to the situation, that the driver can not engage 2nd gear unless 6000 rpms are reached. This makes slow driving almost impossible. And 3000 rpm idle and a clutch means that parking maneuvers will be a nightmare.
 
Usually the second gear has half the ratio of the first and at 12 000 max rpm, is logical to suppose that after reaching the 12 000 rpms in first, when shifting into second it will drop to 6000. But the biggest problem, that I suspect, will be the lack of a flywheel (otherwise 12 000 rpms and the quick rise of rpms can not be reached) which would lead to an idle of 3000 rpm. That, in its turn, would lead to the situation, that the driver can not engage 2nd gear unless 6000 rpms are reached. This makes slow driving almost impossible. And 3000 rpm idle and a clutch means that parking maneuvers will be a nightmare.
GMA had released the gearing information some time ago, you don't need to guess. The first gear is 2.833 and the second is 2.085. That's a ratio of 1.352, so if you shift at 12000, you end up at 8875. Which is fairly standard for most cars. It's also not gonna idle at 3000. The Lexus LFA idles at 1000 RPM and even bikes that rev to 18k idle at 1500. I would be very surprised if the idle on the T.50 wasn't between 1-1.5k.
 
GMA had released the gearing information some time ago, you don't need to guess. The first gear is 2.833 and the second is 2.085. That's a ratio of 1.352, so if you shift at 12000, you end up at 8875. Which is fairly standard for most cars. It's also not gonna idle at 3000. The Lexus LFA idles at 1000 RPM and even bikes that rev to 18k idle at 1500. I would be very surprised if the idle on the T.50 wasn't between 1-1.5k
GMA had released the gearing information some time ago, you don't need to guess. The first gear is 2.833 and the second is 2.085. That's a ratio of 1.352, so if you shift at 12000, you end up at 8875. Which is fairly standard for most cars. It's also not gonna idle at 3000. The Lexus LFA idles at 1000 RPM and even bikes that rev to 18k idle at 1500. I would be very surprised if the idle on the T.50 wasn't between 1-1.5k.
2,8 for first is quite a long gear. Normally (of course T.50 is anything but normal) the reduction to the wheels in first gear is app 15:1 (first gear ratio + crown and pinion ratio). The T.50 has a much larger rev range that would require at least 25:1 to the wheels in first gear. With 2,8 ratio it means that another 9:1 ratio is needed, but this can not be achieved with a crown and a gear due to the size restriction (9:1 would make the crown at least 50 cm in diameter = no ground clearance). Maybe it will have additional reduction, a planetary gear set, to achieve the needed numbers.
 
2,8 for first is quite a long gear. Normally (of course T.50 is anything but normal) the reduction to the wheels in first gear is app 15:1 (first gear ratio + crown and pinion ratio). The T.50 has a much larger rev range that would require at least 25:1 to the wheels in first gear. With 2,8 ratio it means that another 9:1 ratio is needed, but this can not be achieved with a crown and a gear due to the size restriction (9:1 would make the crown at least 50 cm in diameter = no ground clearance). Maybe it will have additional reduction, a planetary gear set, to achieve the needed numbers.
Here are all the ratios:

First 2.833:1
Second 2.095:1
Third 1.577:1
Fourth 1.226:1
Fifth 0.971:1
Sixth 0.744:1
Input bevel 1.688:1
Final drive 3.176:1
Optional overdrive (6th) 0.595:1

So the total for first gear is 15.19 and second is 11.23. I have already made a post calculating the top speeds in each gear, as well as the acceleration - germancarforum.com/threads/gordon-murrays-t50-hypercar.59646/page-5#post-986343

And just to add to the idle rev question - in case you think it needs to idle at 3k because race engines do.
In race engines and other high revving engines, the lack of internal mass isn't really the limiting
factor to keeping the idle revs low. The fact that race engines idle at very high revs is mostly
because of very aggressive cam profiles that allow for a lot of valve overlap - since that allows you
to take full advantage of the scavenging effect (opening of the exhaust valve creates vacuum in the
cylinder that allows you to pull in more air and fuel, increasing power). However, at low revs, this
large valve overlap causes the valves to be open for way too long, the exhaust gasses enter the
cylinder and even the intake and basically it's very bad for the combustion process. So race engines
need to idle higher. The reason why this won't be a problem for the T.50 engine is because it uses
variable valve timing - which race engines either don't bother with, or are not allowed to use. Which
means that at low revs it can use a cam profile with less valve overlap for smooth operation, and
then switch to much more aggressive profile at high revs to get as much power as possible.
 
Usually the second gear has half the ratio of the first and at 12 000 max rpm, is logical to suppose that after reaching the 12 000 rpms in first, when shifting into second it will drop to 6000. But the biggest problem, that I suspect, will be the lack of a flywheel (otherwise 12 000 rpms and the quick rise of rpms can not be reached) which would lead to an idle of 3000 rpm. That, in its turn, would lead to the situation, that the driver can not engage 2nd gear unless 6000 rpms are reached. This makes slow driving almost impossible. And 3000 rpm idle and a clutch means that parking maneuvers will be a nightmare.

There is no reason the engine will have to idle at 3k.

Similar to auto rev matching, the ECU can incorporate an anti-stall model which can help at low speed, if necessary.

Of note, the F1 has an incredibly small flywheel and I've never heard of it being a problem to operate.
 
I've heard they can be rather tricky not to stall on pull away.
This happened a lot on the old F1 cars, some guys would stall their cars at the start of a race and have have about 5 cars crash into the back of them.

This driver seems pretty pissed off he stalled his F1 car..lol

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
A long and interesting read about the full technical details on the T50 engine/gearbox and some of Murrays comments.

T.50 engine – Cosworth GMA V12 - 002.webp


T.50 engine – Cosworth GMA V12 - 005.webp


T.50 supercar:

Powered by the greatest road-car V12 ever made

Maximum driver engagement through optimised power, weight and responsiveness

  • T.50 powerplant will be world’s highest revving, fastest responding, most power dense, and lightest naturally aspirated V12 road car engine
  • Driver-focused, characterful 12-cylinder unit is inspired by high-revving Formula One engines
  • 100% bespoke, super-lightweight Cosworth GMA V12 doesn’t share a single part with any other engine
  • Engineering art: engine fully on show beneath gullwing ‘viewing gallery’
  • Bespoke Xtrac manual ‘H-pattern’ transmission is light, compact and delivers the best shift action of any road car
Ahead of the global premiere of the T.50 supercar on 4 August (17:00 BST), Gordon Murray Automotive has confirmed full details of the bespoke Cosworth GMA V12 engine that will power the new model.

The 3.9-litre powerplant will be the highest revving, fastest responding, most power dense, and lightest naturally aspirated V12 road car engine ever. Meticulously designed and engineered, the powerplant combines the immense experience of Cosworth and Murray to be the most engaging, characterful and driver-focused V12 engine ever produced.


Brief: A Formula One engine for the road

Professor Gordon Murray CBE: “More than half of any truly great driving experience is delivered by the engine, so right from the start I set the highest possible benchmark – to create the world’s greatest naturally-aspirated V12.

“To be truly remarkable, an engine needs to have the right character; highly-responsive, an amazing sound, engaging torque delivery, free-revving, and it has to be naturally aspirated. For all those reasons, the engine in the T.50 was never going to be anything other than a V12.”

A key part of the brief was to keep the capacity of the T.50’s V12 as small as possible. The original inspiration for the engine stemmed from the 3.3-litre V12 powering the legendary Ferrari 250 GTO – small capacity, characterful and powerful. With a clear view on the required acceleration and torque, and the goal of a sub-1,000kg total vehicle weight, Cosworth proposed the capacity could be just 3.9-litres while still achieving supercar performance.

Murray’s brief was clear – the engine had to be light. It had to have the fastest response time of any engine ever built for the road, aping the targets set for his illustrious McLaren F1. It had to be high revving too, and for this characteristic Murray benchmarked the record set with his Light Car Company ‘Rocket’, which revved to 11,500rpm. And to top it off, it had to be characterful, sound superb, and look good – a clean design with no coverings or belt-driven ancillaries.

Not only does the T.50’s V12 promise screaming high-end power, it is also tractable for everyday driving. The maximum torque figure of 467Nm is produced at 9,000rpm, but key to ensuring day-to-day driveability is that 71% of the engine’s torque will be produced from as low as 2,500rpm.

In its most extreme aerodynamic setting – Vmax Mode – the T.50 is optimised for outright performance. Here, while gaining around 50PS from the car’s 48-volt integrated starter-generator, the car combines motorsport slipstream technology and ram air induction to boost performance even further.

Experience: Murray + Cosworth = ultimate motorsport and supercar collaboration

Having started his career as an engine designer, Professor Murray was keen to have a significant influence over the design of the T.50 engine. The powertrain also draws on Murray’s learnings from Formula One racing and his creation of the McLaren F1.

Murray: “Ultra-light components, intelligent packaging and a really fast engine response all come directly from my 20 years’ experience in Formula One. It also informs how everything is driven – the T.50 has no belts, it’s all gear-driven – a direct inheritance from the pinnacle of motorsport.

Layering Murray’s depth of knowledge with Cosworth’s immense expertise in high-performance engines is what takes the T.50 engine to another level. The name Cosworth is synonymous with racing – from Formula One, to rally, to IndyCar – as well as production of some of the most admired supercar engines in the world.

Bruce Wood, Cosworth Managing Director: “The criteria and benchmarks set by Gordon for the T.50 engine comprised one of the toughest engine briefs we’ve ever taken on. It pushes the boundaries in every direction and it is a genuine thrill for everyone at Cosworth to be part of what will surely become as fabled a vehicle as Gordon’s McLaren F1 before it.

“The programme has taken Cosworth to new heights and, although only time will tell, it already feels like the GMA V12 has the potential to be one of the most iconic engines of all time.”

In devising his brief for the T.50 engine, Murray drew on his experience working with the 3.5-litre Honda RA121E V12 engine that powered the McLaren MP4/6 Formula One cars in the early nineties. According to Murray, this engine was the peak of the Formula One V12 powerplants in terms of its performance, balance and weight.

The T.50 powertrain also draws inspiration from the BMW S70/2 V12 developed for Murray’s highly revered McLaren F1, which to many remains the ultimate supercar engine. But for Murray there were improvements that could be made.

Murray: “Above all else, I wanted it to look clean like the BMW S70/2 engine, which had no carbon or plastic covers. It was just inlet trumpets, cam covers, exhaust block and heads, and a few belt-driven ancillaries that I managed to squeeze out of sight. In designing the T.50 V12, I wanted it to be the antidote to the modern supercar where you can’t see the engine beneath carbon covers.”

Even today, the F1 is considered to be one of the finest driver’s cars money can buy – but Murray always felt that the S70/2 engine could have been improved. The BMW unit is a much lower revving engine, meaning that for Murray, just as the sound began to build, the next gearchange cut the experience short.

Creation: a 100% bespoke V12 that may never be surpassed

Murray: “I started my career as an engine designer, so conceiving and specifying the 100% bespoke 3.9-litre V12 for the T.50 was such a joy. Having a blank sheet of paper and setting out to create the world’s best, highest-revving, most beautifully crafted, amazing sounding engine is something I’ve been waiting to do for years!”

The highest-revving, most responsive naturally aspirated engine ever

The record for highest-revving engine was previously held by another of Gordon Murray’s creations – the 11,500rpm Light Car Company’s ‘Rocket’. This record will be beaten by the T.50 V12.

Beyond the record-setting and the totally-unique experience of driving a car that revs this high, the logic behind the 12,100rpm is to maximise driver engagement with, and appreciation of, the raw power available as revs increase.

The T.50 engine will deliver maximum power (663PS) at 11,500rpm. But driver enjoyment won’t kick in only at the far end of the rev range. This engine will also be the most responsive naturally aspirated road-car engine ever produced. Measured in revolutions gained per second, the T.50 will achieve mind-boggling responsiveness, picking up at 28,400 revs per second (the F1 engine’s equivalent is around 10,000 revs per second). To put the T.50 figure into context, this means that its V12 can rev from idle to its 12,100rpm redline in 0.3 of a second. Another figure that sets a new benchmark and is unlikely to ever be surpassed with a road car.

The most power-dense naturally aspirated engine ever

The T.50 engine produces the highest power density of any naturally aspirated road car engine ever made - 166PS-per-litre. This record, coupled with the lightness of the unit, places this engine right at the pinnacle of naturally-aspirated powertrain development.

The lightest road-going V12 ever

The T.50 V12 had to be light, to align with Murray’s ethos for the whole car. To achieve the lowest weight possible the block in the T.50 is made from a high-strength aluminium alloy, the crankshaft is made from steel and weighs only 13 kilograms, and the connecting rods and valves are made from titanium – as is the clutch housing. This all contributed to engine weight of just 178kg – yet another road-car record.

Murray: “Good design throughout kept engine weight low, while our refusal to cut corners in terms of quality, packaging, layout, and of course performance ensured we surpassed all of our goals.”

The best V12 sound ever

Delivering on a key element of the brief, the naturally-aspirated powerplant in the T.50 promises to be one of the best sounding road car engines ever made.

Part of the aural enjoyment will be created by the car’s screaming redline, but the team behind the T.50 have also found additional ways to ensure the sound of the engine delivers maximum driver enjoyment. The T.50 features Direct Path Induction Sound – a system pioneered on the McLaren F1 and refined on the T.50 to channel the sound of the raucous V12 into the cabin.

The cold-air ram induction intake sits immediately above the driver’s head, and is crafted – with varying thicknesses of carbon fibre in the roof that act as a loudspeaker – to amplify engine sound in the cabin. The beauty of the system is that it is actuated by throttle angle and not revs, this means the T.50 is quiet and refined on part throttle and grows louder as the driver pushes through half-throttle and beyond.

Murray: “You can never get a great sound from a turbocharged engine. The T.50 engine sound is going to be phenomenal. The intoxicating growl that drivers love is introduced as the throttle angle increases, the sound intensifies as the induction sound kicks in, then as you push towards the upper end of the rev range the V12 will sing like nothing else on the road.”

Engineering-in optimal driver enjoyment

The T.50’s engine is semi-structural, providing much of the rigidity and weight saving found in a race car, without compromising driver comfort and cabin refinement. The Gordon Murray Automotive team opted for a semi-structural engine to reap the rewards of weight saving and stiffness while avoiding the NVH downsides of fully-structural units, which struggle with cabin noise and ride-comfort.

In the T.50, the suspension wishbones are connected to the gearbox casing, which manages the forces associated with braking, accelerative reaction and lateral cornering forces. Lateral movement of the engine is limited by two rubber-mounted trapezoidal links from the gearbox. Looking at the rear of the car, these links meet at the ground plane, forming a triangle and adding stiffness while limiting any lateral movement. Meanwhile, fore and aft movement of the engine is kept in check by snubber bushings on the engine mountings that allow the degree of engine movement to be tuned during maximum acceleration and braking.

Low centre of gravity

The size, weight and well-considered positioning of the T.50’s engine all play a key role delivering the car’s overall low centre of gravity. Compact dimensions were critical. Murray’s aim was to better the F1’s 125mm crank height, a feat more than achieved with the new supercar’s crank, sitting just 85mm from the bottom of the engine. This is largely thanks to Cosworth’s innovative design, which scavenges oil using windage to ensure that the crank sits as close to the sump line as possible.

This improves the vehicle dynamics in a few key areas. The low centre of gravity means less pitch during cornering and braking, less squat and dive and better transient handling. The overall effect cannot be overestimated for the T.50’s vehicle dynamics.

Engineering art: The beauty of simplicity

The average modern supercar is festooned with plastic and carbon fibre covers – the T.50 is not. In many ways the car serves as the antithesis to the modern supercar, presenting a clean and contemporary celebration of the engine, evocative of the stripped-back approach evident with 1960s performance cars.

The T.50’s engine bay is designed to present the engine in all its glory. Housed beneath duel ‘gullwing’ openings, which both pivot from the car’s central spine, the engine sits proudly without covers to focus on the raw beauty of the V12.

Inspired by race car engines, the Cosworth GMA V12 uses gear-driven ancillaries for lightness, with the added benefit of a clean and uncluttered engine bay, devoid of unsightly belts. All of the ancillaries are carefully positioned out of sight leaving the block heads, primary exhaust manifolds and inlet trumpets centre stage.

Murray: “Every component on this car is a piece of engineering art, and the engine is no exception. I wanted the engine to look like a modern interpretation of a 1960s V12. If it wasn’t the beating heart of the T.50 it would make a fabulous, sculptural modern-art installation.”

The world’s best gearchange – six-speed close-ratio transmission

Created by British transmission experts Xtrac, the short-shifting six-speed manual gearbox in the T.50 is staggeringly lightweight. Weighing just 80.5kg, the bespoke unit was created to meet the brief to offer ‘the best gearchange in the world’ – for maximum driver enjoyment.

Murray: “Maximising the driver’s connection with the T.50 was central to our decision-making. So, matching the V12 engine to an exquisite short-shifting manual gearbox was an easy decision to make.”

Brief: Super-light, highly-compact, zero compromise on shift quality

As with the powertrain, the brief for the T.50’s gearbox was similarly comprehensive. It had to be extremely lightweight while remaining a robust semi-structural component; it should have an outstanding gearshift feel; and it had to meet Murray’s exacting, compact packaging specification. Murray insisted the gearbox be both short and narrow to fit into the car’s compact dimensions and to avoid any interference with car’s pioneering ground-effect aerodynamics.

A totally-bespoke, transmission of exceptional quality – the ultimate gearshift

The six-speed manual ‘H-pattern’ short-throw gearbox that resulted from the brief is a piece of exceptional design. Being totally bespoke, it was possible to optimise every component for weight. Remarkably, the Xtrac team created a super-strong, but extremely light aluminium housing that was cast at just 2.4mm thickness.

During early testing, the gearchange motion and weighting was honed meticulously, with adjustable actuators fitted to all parts of the gear linkage. Signed-off personally by Murray, the painstaking testing process ensured that the end result was perfect in every way.

The final gearbox has a short throw and a narrow cross gate for smooth, crisp gearchanges. It features five close ratios, geared for acceleration, with a longer sixth ratio for cruising.

Engine and transmission – Technical specification

Engine

Type number Cosworth GMA

Configuration V12 semi-structural

V-angle 65°

Capacity 3,994 cc

Bore 81.5 mm

Stroke 63.8 mm

Compression ratio 14:1

Max power 663 PS @ 11,500 rpm

Power to weight ratio 672 PS per tonne

Weight to power ratio 150 kg per 100 PS

Max torque 467 Nm @ 9,000 rpm

Flexibility 71% of max torque @ 2,500 rpm

Maximum rpm 12,100 rpm

Valve train Gear driven double overhead camshafts

Inclined axis 4 valves per cylinder – variable valve timing on inlet / exhaust

Induction system RAM induction airbox – 4 throttle bodies – Direct Path Induction Sound

Exhaust system Inconel and Titanium

Lubrication system Dry sump

Cooling system Water-cooled - twin aluminium front radiators

Oil cooling system Single aluminium rear radiator

Ignition system 12 individual coils 12-volt

Starter/alternator 48-volt gear driven integrated starter / generator

Exhaust emission control 4 catalytic convertors with Lambda sensors and secondary air injection

Engine block Aluminium alloy

Cylinder heads Aluminium alloy

Connection rods Titanium

Valves Titanium

Total engine weight 178 kg

Engine mounting Semi-structural-inclined axis shear mounting (IASM)

Power density 166 PS-per-litre

Transmission

Configuration Transverse with high-speed bevel gears and spur gear final drive

Speeds 6 speeds + reverse: full synchro mesh

Gear change Manual H pattern with reverse lock-out

Differential Limited slip (Salisbury)

Clutch 184 mm diameter – Triple plate carbon silicone and titanium

Drive line Tripod joints and gun drilled drive shafts

Casing Aluminium alloy

Lubrication Pumped lubrication

Oil cooling Single aluminium alloy radiator

Ratios

First 2.833:1

Second 2.095:1

Third 1.577:1

Fourth 1.226:1

Fifth 0.971:1

Sixth 0.744:1

Input bevel 1.688:1

Final drive 3.176:1

Optional overdrive (6th) 0.595:1

Weight 80.5 kg

T.50 engine – Cosworth GMA V12 - 004.webp
 
A long and interesting read about the full technical details on the T50 engine/gearbox and some of Murrays comments.

T.50 engine – Cosworth GMA V12 - 002.jpg


T.50 engine – Cosworth GMA V12 - 005.jpg


T.50 supercar:

Powered by the greatest road-car V12 ever made

Maximum driver engagement through optimised power, weight and responsiveness

  • T.50 powerplant will be world’s highest revving, fastest responding, most power dense, and lightest naturally aspirated V12 road car engine
  • Driver-focused, characterful 12-cylinder unit is inspired by high-revving Formula One engines
  • 100% bespoke, super-lightweight Cosworth GMA V12 doesn’t share a single part with any other engine
  • Engineering art: engine fully on show beneath gullwing ‘viewing gallery’
  • Bespoke Xtrac manual ‘H-pattern’ transmission is light, compact and delivers the best shift action of any road car
Ahead of the global premiere of the T.50 supercar on 4 August (17:00 BST), Gordon Murray Automotive has confirmed full details of the bespoke Cosworth GMA V12 engine that will power the new model.

The 3.9-litre powerplant will be the highest revving, fastest responding, most power dense, and lightest naturally aspirated V12 road car engine ever. Meticulously designed and engineered, the powerplant combines the immense experience of Cosworth and Murray to be the most engaging, characterful and driver-focused V12 engine ever produced.


Brief: A Formula One engine for the road

Professor Gordon Murray CBE: “More than half of any truly great driving experience is delivered by the engine, so right from the start I set the highest possible benchmark – to create the world’s greatest naturally-aspirated V12.

“To be truly remarkable, an engine needs to have the right character; highly-responsive, an amazing sound, engaging torque delivery, free-revving, and it has to be naturally aspirated. For all those reasons, the engine in the T.50 was never going to be anything other than a V12.”

A key part of the brief was to keep the capacity of the T.50’s V12 as small as possible. The original inspiration for the engine stemmed from the 3.3-litre V12 powering the legendary Ferrari 250 GTO – small capacity, characterful and powerful. With a clear view on the required acceleration and torque, and the goal of a sub-1,000kg total vehicle weight, Cosworth proposed the capacity could be just 3.9-litres while still achieving supercar performance.

Murray’s brief was clear – the engine had to be light. It had to have the fastest response time of any engine ever built for the road, aping the targets set for his illustrious McLaren F1. It had to be high revving too, and for this characteristic Murray benchmarked the record set with his Light Car Company ‘Rocket’, which revved to 11,500rpm. And to top it off, it had to be characterful, sound superb, and look good – a clean design with no coverings or belt-driven ancillaries.

Not only does the T.50’s V12 promise screaming high-end power, it is also tractable for everyday driving. The maximum torque figure of 467Nm is produced at 9,000rpm, but key to ensuring day-to-day driveability is that 71% of the engine’s torque will be produced from as low as 2,500rpm.

In its most extreme aerodynamic setting – Vmax Mode – the T.50 is optimised for outright performance. Here, while gaining around 50PS from the car’s 48-volt integrated starter-generator, the car combines motorsport slipstream technology and ram air induction to boost performance even further.

Experience: Murray + Cosworth = ultimate motorsport and supercar collaboration

Having started his career as an engine designer, Professor Murray was keen to have a significant influence over the design of the T.50 engine. The powertrain also draws on Murray’s learnings from Formula One racing and his creation of the McLaren F1.

Murray: “Ultra-light components, intelligent packaging and a really fast engine response all come directly from my 20 years’ experience in Formula One. It also informs how everything is driven – the T.50 has no belts, it’s all gear-driven – a direct inheritance from the pinnacle of motorsport.

Layering Murray’s depth of knowledge with Cosworth’s immense expertise in high-performance engines is what takes the T.50 engine to another level. The name Cosworth is synonymous with racing – from Formula One, to rally, to IndyCar – as well as production of some of the most admired supercar engines in the world.

Bruce Wood, Cosworth Managing Director: “The criteria and benchmarks set by Gordon for the T.50 engine comprised one of the toughest engine briefs we’ve ever taken on. It pushes the boundaries in every direction and it is a genuine thrill for everyone at Cosworth to be part of what will surely become as fabled a vehicle as Gordon’s McLaren F1 before it.

“The programme has taken Cosworth to new heights and, although only time will tell, it already feels like the GMA V12 has the potential to be one of the most iconic engines of all time.”

In devising his brief for the T.50 engine, Murray drew on his experience working with the 3.5-litre Honda RA121E V12 engine that powered the McLaren MP4/6 Formula One cars in the early nineties. According to Murray, this engine was the peak of the Formula One V12 powerplants in terms of its performance, balance and weight.

The T.50 powertrain also draws inspiration from the BMW S70/2 V12 developed for Murray’s highly revered McLaren F1, which to many remains the ultimate supercar engine. But for Murray there were improvements that could be made.

Murray: “Above all else, I wanted it to look clean like the BMW S70/2 engine, which had no carbon or plastic covers. It was just inlet trumpets, cam covers, exhaust block and heads, and a few belt-driven ancillaries that I managed to squeeze out of sight. In designing the T.50 V12, I wanted it to be the antidote to the modern supercar where you can’t see the engine beneath carbon covers.”

Even today, the F1 is considered to be one of the finest driver’s cars money can buy – but Murray always felt that the S70/2 engine could have been improved. The BMW unit is a much lower revving engine, meaning that for Murray, just as the sound began to build, the next gearchange cut the experience short.

Creation: a 100% bespoke V12 that may never be surpassed

Murray: “I started my career as an engine designer, so conceiving and specifying the 100% bespoke 3.9-litre V12 for the T.50 was such a joy. Having a blank sheet of paper and setting out to create the world’s best, highest-revving, most beautifully crafted, amazing sounding engine is something I’ve been waiting to do for years!”

The highest-revving, most responsive naturally aspirated engine ever

The record for highest-revving engine was previously held by another of Gordon Murray’s creations – the 11,500rpm Light Car Company’s ‘Rocket’. This record will be beaten by the T.50 V12.

Beyond the record-setting and the totally-unique experience of driving a car that revs this high, the logic behind the 12,100rpm is to maximise driver engagement with, and appreciation of, the raw power available as revs increase.

The T.50 engine will deliver maximum power (663PS) at 11,500rpm. But driver enjoyment won’t kick in only at the far end of the rev range. This engine will also be the most responsive naturally aspirated road-car engine ever produced. Measured in revolutions gained per second, the T.50 will achieve mind-boggling responsiveness, picking up at 28,400 revs per second (the F1 engine’s equivalent is around 10,000 revs per second). To put the T.50 figure into context, this means that its V12 can rev from idle to its 12,100rpm redline in 0.3 of a second. Another figure that sets a new benchmark and is unlikely to ever be surpassed with a road car.

The most power-dense naturally aspirated engine ever

The T.50 engine produces the highest power density of any naturally aspirated road car engine ever made - 166PS-per-litre. This record, coupled with the lightness of the unit, places this engine right at the pinnacle of naturally-aspirated powertrain development.

The lightest road-going V12 ever

The T.50 V12 had to be light, to align with Murray’s ethos for the whole car. To achieve the lowest weight possible the block in the T.50 is made from a high-strength aluminium alloy, the crankshaft is made from steel and weighs only 13 kilograms, and the connecting rods and valves are made from titanium – as is the clutch housing. This all contributed to engine weight of just 178kg – yet another road-car record.

Murray: “Good design throughout kept engine weight low, while our refusal to cut corners in terms of quality, packaging, layout, and of course performance ensured we surpassed all of our goals.”

The best V12 sound ever

Delivering on a key element of the brief, the naturally-aspirated powerplant in the T.50 promises to be one of the best sounding road car engines ever made.

Part of the aural enjoyment will be created by the car’s screaming redline, but the team behind the T.50 have also found additional ways to ensure the sound of the engine delivers maximum driver enjoyment. The T.50 features Direct Path Induction Sound – a system pioneered on the McLaren F1 and refined on the T.50 to channel the sound of the raucous V12 into the cabin.

The cold-air ram induction intake sits immediately above the driver’s head, and is crafted – with varying thicknesses of carbon fibre in the roof that act as a loudspeaker – to amplify engine sound in the cabin. The beauty of the system is that it is actuated by throttle angle and not revs, this means the T.50 is quiet and refined on part throttle and grows louder as the driver pushes through half-throttle and beyond.

Murray: “You can never get a great sound from a turbocharged engine. The T.50 engine sound is going to be phenomenal. The intoxicating growl that drivers love is introduced as the throttle angle increases, the sound intensifies as the induction sound kicks in, then as you push towards the upper end of the rev range the V12 will sing like nothing else on the road.”

Engineering-in optimal driver enjoyment

The T.50’s engine is semi-structural, providing much of the rigidity and weight saving found in a race car, without compromising driver comfort and cabin refinement. The Gordon Murray Automotive team opted for a semi-structural engine to reap the rewards of weight saving and stiffness while avoiding the NVH downsides of fully-structural units, which struggle with cabin noise and ride-comfort.

In the T.50, the suspension wishbones are connected to the gearbox casing, which manages the forces associated with braking, accelerative reaction and lateral cornering forces. Lateral movement of the engine is limited by two rubber-mounted trapezoidal links from the gearbox. Looking at the rear of the car, these links meet at the ground plane, forming a triangle and adding stiffness while limiting any lateral movement. Meanwhile, fore and aft movement of the engine is kept in check by snubber bushings on the engine mountings that allow the degree of engine movement to be tuned during maximum acceleration and braking.

Low centre of gravity

The size, weight and well-considered positioning of the T.50’s engine all play a key role delivering the car’s overall low centre of gravity. Compact dimensions were critical. Murray’s aim was to better the F1’s 125mm crank height, a feat more than achieved with the new supercar’s crank, sitting just 85mm from the bottom of the engine. This is largely thanks to Cosworth’s innovative design, which scavenges oil using windage to ensure that the crank sits as close to the sump line as possible.

This improves the vehicle dynamics in a few key areas. The low centre of gravity means less pitch during cornering and braking, less squat and dive and better transient handling. The overall effect cannot be overestimated for the T.50’s vehicle dynamics.

Engineering art: The beauty of simplicity

The average modern supercar is festooned with plastic and carbon fibre covers – the T.50 is not. In many ways the car serves as the antithesis to the modern supercar, presenting a clean and contemporary celebration of the engine, evocative of the stripped-back approach evident with 1960s performance cars.

The T.50’s engine bay is designed to present the engine in all its glory. Housed beneath duel ‘gullwing’ openings, which both pivot from the car’s central spine, the engine sits proudly without covers to focus on the raw beauty of the V12.

Inspired by race car engines, the Cosworth GMA V12 uses gear-driven ancillaries for lightness, with the added benefit of a clean and uncluttered engine bay, devoid of unsightly belts. All of the ancillaries are carefully positioned out of sight leaving the block heads, primary exhaust manifolds and inlet trumpets centre stage.

Murray: “Every component on this car is a piece of engineering art, and the engine is no exception. I wanted the engine to look like a modern interpretation of a 1960s V12. If it wasn’t the beating heart of the T.50 it would make a fabulous, sculptural modern-art installation.”

The world’s best gearchange – six-speed close-ratio transmission

Created by British transmission experts Xtrac, the short-shifting six-speed manual gearbox in the T.50 is staggeringly lightweight. Weighing just 80.5kg, the bespoke unit was created to meet the brief to offer ‘the best gearchange in the world’ – for maximum driver enjoyment.

Murray: “Maximising the driver’s connection with the T.50 was central to our decision-making. So, matching the V12 engine to an exquisite short-shifting manual gearbox was an easy decision to make.”

Brief: Super-light, highly-compact, zero compromise on shift quality

As with the powertrain, the brief for the T.50’s gearbox was similarly comprehensive. It had to be extremely lightweight while remaining a robust semi-structural component; it should have an outstanding gearshift feel; and it had to meet Murray’s exacting, compact packaging specification. Murray insisted the gearbox be both short and narrow to fit into the car’s compact dimensions and to avoid any interference with car’s pioneering ground-effect aerodynamics.

A totally-bespoke, transmission of exceptional quality – the ultimate gearshift

The six-speed manual ‘H-pattern’ short-throw gearbox that resulted from the brief is a piece of exceptional design. Being totally bespoke, it was possible to optimise every component for weight. Remarkably, the Xtrac team created a super-strong, but extremely light aluminium housing that was cast at just 2.4mm thickness.

During early testing, the gearchange motion and weighting was honed meticulously, with adjustable actuators fitted to all parts of the gear linkage. Signed-off personally by Murray, the painstaking testing process ensured that the end result was perfect in every way.

The final gearbox has a short throw and a narrow cross gate for smooth, crisp gearchanges. It features five close ratios, geared for acceleration, with a longer sixth ratio for cruising.

Engine and transmission – Technical specification

Engine

Type number Cosworth GMA

Configuration V12 semi-structural

V-angle 65°

Capacity 3,994 cc

Bore 81.5 mm

Stroke 63.8 mm

Compression ratio 14:1

Max power 663 PS @ 11,500 rpm

Power to weight ratio 672 PS per tonne

Weight to power ratio 150 kg per 100 PS

Max torque 467 Nm @ 9,000 rpm

Flexibility 71% of max torque @ 2,500 rpm

Maximum rpm 12,100 rpm

Valve train Gear driven double overhead camshafts

Inclined axis 4 valves per cylinder – variable valve timing on inlet / exhaust

Induction system RAM induction airbox – 4 throttle bodies – Direct Path Induction Sound

Exhaust system Inconel and Titanium

Lubrication system Dry sump

Cooling system Water-cooled - twin aluminium front radiators

Oil cooling system Single aluminium rear radiator

Ignition system 12 individual coils 12-volt

Starter/alternator 48-volt gear driven integrated starter / generator

Exhaust emission control 4 catalytic convertors with Lambda sensors and secondary air injection

Engine block Aluminium alloy

Cylinder heads Aluminium alloy

Connection rods Titanium

Valves Titanium

Total engine weight 178 kg

Engine mounting Semi-structural-inclined axis shear mounting (IASM)

Power density 166 PS-per-litre

Transmission

Configuration Transverse with high-speed bevel gears and spur gear final drive

Speeds 6 speeds + reverse: full synchro mesh

Gear change Manual H pattern with reverse lock-out

Differential Limited slip (Salisbury)

Clutch 184 mm diameter – Triple plate carbon silicone and titanium

Drive line Tripod joints and gun drilled drive shafts

Casing Aluminium alloy

Lubrication Pumped lubrication

Oil cooling Single aluminium alloy radiator

Ratios

First 2.833:1

Second 2.095:1

Third 1.577:1

Fourth 1.226:1

Fifth 0.971:1

Sixth 0.744:1

Input bevel 1.688:1

Final drive 3.176:1

Optional overdrive (6th) 0.595:1

Weight 80.5 kg

T.50 engine – Cosworth GMA V12 - 004.jpg
dang, that engine is so purdy to look at.

@Rolf, what is the source for this article and are the more pics?
 
Alright, after having 2 weeks to mull over the design, here is my detailed assessment.

Overall I think the car looks very good. If I was to put a number on it, I would say 8/10. To understand where I am coming from, I would put the F1 (as well as the Huracan and the 458 for example) at 9/10 and the F1 LM at 10/10. Some other relatively modern designs I consider 10/10: Original Murcielago, XJ220, Carrera GT. 10/10 would basically be cars that look so good that it doesn't even matter if they are completely terrible otherwise. 9/10 are where the looks are a major asset of the car. 8/10 are good looking cars that nevertheless miss out on a few details that would give them that instant wow look. Which is where the T.50 falls.

98-gordon-murray-t50-official-reveal-side.jpg

The profile of this car is its best angle, as well as pretty much perfect. Even the raised fan tube compliments the look (aesthetically the same effect you achieve with a wing - empathizes the car as an aggressive wedge shaped object) . The proportions are excellent. There is nothing I don't like about the two-tone cabin. I like the roof scoop and I even like the double pane windows. The wheel design is one of the best I've seen - I would pretty much steal the wheels to use them on all my cars. The vent behind the front wheels (as well as the painted black portion at the bottom) makes for very nice flowing lines and the "Gordon Murray Design" black strip with an integrated indicator is a nice touch.

GMA-T.50_925x520_acf_cropped.jpg

The front is where the biggest problem lies - the headlights. As many here I wasn't impressed with their design upon release and in the two weeks they haven't really managed to grow on me. The main issue I see with them is that they are not aggressive enough and as a result, the front is not aggressive enough. When I look at the front, it's very hard for me to intuitively imagine that this car costs 3M dollars and has a 654hp, 12.1k RPM V12. The front, to me, says 50k dollars, 350hp V6. The headlight design is too simple, too unimaginative, too inoffensive. On a supercar, the headlights should be eyes of a predator. They should inspire fear and make you think of danger. The T.50's headlights make me think of happiness and yogurt.

On the other hand, though, I can understand the look Murray was going for. The thin front lip and generally the low position of the front bonnet are keys to making the car look light and sporty. And if light and sporty was the desired look, then the headlights do complement it nicely. Murray has called the car a "hyper GT", but I think a much more fitting term would be "hyper sportscar". That's what this essentially is. A sportscar made with bespoke parts, with a huge budget and with a supercar engine. So as much as the headlights might not be aggressive enough for a supercar, maybe our brains will get to accept the car as this completely new thing - a hyper sportscar.

97-gordon-murray-t50-official-reveal-rear.jpg

In the rear, the obvious talking point is the fan. It doesn't look bad per se, but I am not sure it completely fits with the rest of the design. If it was me, I would have the fan more integrated into the hull so the sense of a huge tube being tacked on top is minimized and I would tone down the turbine-like fan exit so it looks less like a comic book batman car. Otherwise the rear looks good - simple, but flowing like the rest of the car and the huge diffusers give it a lot of presence. Would it look better without the fan? Probably, but I am actually not that bothered by it. One more thing I would like to point out about the rear is that the car might suffer a bit from not being wide enough. If you look at the rear from near perpendicular angle, it looks a bit weird, a bit too tall almost. It needs something to make the back look a bit wider, maybe having the rear lights slightly further apart.

t50 interior.jpg

As far as interior goes, I would rate it 9/10. Overall excellent. There is just a few details I am not so sure about. All the black knobs look like they are made from plastic (they are supposed to be machined aluminium). They actually might be plastic on this show car, but if that's how they are gonna look in the finished product, then I would definitely spec them in naked metal with black markings instead. And the markings themselves look way too old fashioned for my taste. The wheel is good, but there could be a bit more detail, looks a bit boring. The tachometer is great, but the 11-12-13 should be done in red or orange. And for the last of my nitpicks, the screens doubling as mirrors should be bigger and bezelless - right now they look a bit too much like a last minute addition. Overall, though, as I said, the interior is great, with the pedals and shifter being the highlights.
 
Alright, after having 2 weeks to mull over the design, here is my detailed assessment.

Overall I think the car looks very good. If I was to put a number on it, I would say 8/10. To understand where I am coming from, I would put the F1 (as well as the Huracan and the 458 for example) at 9/10 and the F1 LM at 10/10. Some other relatively modern designs I consider 10/10: Original Murcielago, XJ220, Carrera GT. 10/10 would basically be cars that look so good that it doesn't even matter if they are completely terrible otherwise. 9/10 are where the looks are a major asset of the car. 8/10 are good looking cars that nevertheless miss out on a few details that would give them that instant wow look. Which is where the T.50 falls.

98-gordon-murray-t50-official-reveal-side.jpg

The profile of this car is its best angle, as well as pretty much perfect. Even the raised fan tube compliments the look (aesthetically the same effect you achieve with a wing - empathizes the car as an aggressive wedge shaped object) . The proportions are excellent. There is nothing I don't like about the two-tone cabin. I like the roof scoop and I even like the double pane windows. The wheel design is one of the best I've seen - I would pretty much steal the wheels to use them on all my cars. The vent behind the front wheels (as well as the painted black portion at the bottom) makes for very nice flowing lines and the "Gordon Murray Design" black strip with an integrated indicator is a nice touch.

GMA-T.50_925x520_acf_cropped.jpg

The front is where the biggest problem lies - the headlights. As many here I wasn't impressed with their design upon release and in the two weeks they haven't really managed to grow on me. The main issue I see with them is that they are not aggressive enough and as a result, the front is not aggressive enough. When I look at the front, it's very hard for me to intuitively imagine that this car costs 3M dollars and has a 654hp, 12.1k RPM V12. The front, to me, says 50k dollars, 350hp V6. The headlight design is too simple, too unimaginative, too inoffensive. On a supercar, the headlights should be eyes of a predator. They should inspire fear and make you think of danger. The T.50's headlight make me think of happiness and yogurt.

On the other hand, though, I can understand the look Murray was going for. The thin front lip and generally the low position of the front bonnet are keys to making the car look light and sporty. And if light and sporty was the desired look, then the headlights do complement it nicely. Murray has called the car a "hyper GT", but I think a much more fitting term would be "hyper sportscar". That's what this essentially is. A sportscar made with bespoke parts, with a huge budget and with a supercar engine. So as much as the headlights might not be aggressive enough for a supercar, maybe our brains will get to accept the car as this completely new thing - a hyper sportscar.

97-gordon-murray-t50-official-reveal-rear.jpg

In the rear, the obvious talking point the fan. It doesn't look bad per se, but I am not sure it completely fits with the rest of the design. If it was me, I would have the fan more integrated into the hull so the sense of a huge tube being tacked on top is minimized and I would tone down the turbine-like fan exit so it looks less like a comic book batman car. Otherwise the rear looks good - simple, but flowing like the rest of the car and the huge diffusers give it a lot of presence. Would it look better without the fan? Probably, but I am actually not that bothered by it. One more thing I would like to point out about the rear is that the car might suffer a bit from not being wide enough. If you look at the rear from near perpendicular angle, it looks a bit weird, a bit too tall almost. It needs something to make the back look a bit wider, maybe having the rear lights slightly further apart.

t50 interior.jpg

As far as interior goes, I would rate it 9/10. Overall excellent. There is just a few details I am not so sure about. All the black knobs look like they are made from plastic (they are supposed to be machined aluminium). They actually might be plastic on this show car, but if that's how they are gonna look in the finished product, then I would definitely spec them in naked metal with black markings instead. And the markings themselves look way too old fashioned for my taste. The wheel is good, but there could be a bit more detail, looks a bit boring. The tachometer is great, but the 11-12-13 should be done in red or orange. And for the last of my nitpicks, the screens doubling as mirrors should be bigger and bezelless - right now they look a bit too much like a last minute addition. Overall, though, as I said, the interior is great, with the pedals and shifter being the highlights.
I basically agree with all you say. What I like most with this car is the interior, I just wish that they made the steering wheel completely round like the F1 and as a response to all cuadratic wheels the other supercars (and even normal cars) use today.
 
The headlight glass housing is just way too big and the thin vents underneath the headlights exacerbate this.

Otherwise, I wouldn't change a thing. Function is timeless.
 

Trending content


Back
Top