Zafiro
Supreme Roadmaster
- Messages
- 30,811
Porsche Guy said:Am I the only one who thinks we're hyping this car up to be something it's not? Those performance figures are as a fast as a F430.
lol yeah, MB fans are like children on christmas
Porsche Guy said:Am I the only one who thinks we're hyping this car up to be something it's not? Those performance figures are as a fast as a F430.
I can't tell you how hard I laughed when I read that. So true.Just_me said:lol yeah, MB fans are like children on christmas![]()
Porsche Guy said:Am I the only one who thinks we're hyping this car up to be something it's not? Those performance figures are as a fast as a F430.
Well, that's convenient. It's not that I don't want the CLK63 to be as fast as a Ferrari, I just doubt it will be. I can't believe we're even discussing this! It's insane when you really think about it. This is a $70K (guess) pedestrian coupe that may be as fast as an F430. Kudo's to AMG. I still want the Ferrari though.GTA7.5 said:the article says "Mommy, race that Ferrari"
Just_me said:lol yeah, MB fans are like children on christmas![]()
Adding more gears is not guaranteed to make your car accelerate faster. It means you have to shift more, which means less time for the engine to put power to the ground. The 7 speed transmission was also designed for standard spec Mercedes so it's going to be not nearly as fast as SMG or DSG, even if AMG did improve shift times. The Kompressor V8 had so much torque that it didn't need two extra gears. It used its massive torque to pull those long gears. I realize that this engine has a lot of torque also, but it's not to the same extent as the Kompressor. Also, there is the problem of traction. The Kompressor V8 burned rubber like it was its job and I would assume that with shorter gears and this new engine, you're going to have the same problem. This car will certainly be a moster at high speeds but I'm not sure about 0-60 or even 60-100 where traction can be an issure with this much power. Most importantly, great specs on paper do not always translate to equally great performance in the real world. Time will tell though......AMG-UNIT said:And yes GTA , your numbers are too conservative , for a moment I feel as if you are afraid to be honest because of so many comments from others towards MB fans , but always remember that the CLS 55 has a 5 speed tranny wich cannot help as much between 60 and 100 mph as the 7Gtronic , that should convince you enough to see results as such as F430 . Oh yeah , and dont forget the 7200 RPM .
Believe me , if MB completely replaces an already amazing engine such as V8kompresser Im sure the improvement should be major .
Porsche Guy said:Adding more gears is not guaranteed to make your car accelerate faster. It means you have to shift more, which means less time for the engine to put power to the ground. The 7 speed transmission was also designed for standard spec Mercedes so it's going to be not nearly as fast as SMG or DSG, even if AMG did improve shift times.
Matt said:These MB fans only care about straight line performance lol. All I here from them is how quickly its going to go from 0 to what ever.
Matt said:So tell me how they improved something other than strait line performance. If they really want to "eat" the M6/M5 they have to work on there cornering capabilities, dont you think?
Please inform.
Matt said:No matter what engine you put under the bonnet, A merc will never be a real drivers car until they start making non-automatic transmissions.
Matt said:Who said anything about athletic ability? I'm just saying that guys who enjoy driving and racing probably won't consider a merc because its just another boring automatic that any fool with money can drive fast.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.