Vs 4Car: Audi A4 vs BMW 3-series vs Mercedes C-klass


Well, how is it BMW's fault that Audi can't make a car as fast as the CSL? And my whole point is that there is always a faster 3er than an A4 ... for now.

And oh, I didn't know Audi fans had such squishy balls... :D j/k.

You honestly believe that Audi can't make a car as fast as the CSL M3?:t-crazy2: Dude maybe your not up on cars as much as you claim! Company's like Buick and Saturn can make a car to achieve the same if not better performance then the M3 CSL, the only question is will people buy it, and is it worth the investment! My point in my previous post was that Audi makes plush cars, not ballbusting, optionless, sportscars my friend. Unlike BMW being forced into a market segment they'd rather not play in at this time (M10 to compete with the R8) Audi would never follow in BMW's footsteps with a stipped down, lacking everything Audi's known for in creature comforts car like the CSL. It wouldn't fit Audi's image, or customer base. BMW owners on the other hand aren't overly concerned with having 1st rate interiors, so bare bone versions of there cars fits BMW's image quite well! I believe the E92 M3 CSL will offer the majority of the features and comfort of the standard M3, so you'll see such performance won't be obtained this time, do to the lack of weight reduction imho. I said what I had to say, peace!:)
 
C-klasse - Like the C-clas, but the more I look at it the more it feels a little too "pretty" for me. Great car regardless, especially compared to the previous car.

3er - Probably the best car to drive in it's class. Interior design is a little funky. Don't like the fact that everyone and their Mom has one. Can get pricey really easy even with the most basic of options(at least by todays standards)- but what more could you expect from a marketing driven company???

A4 - Solid piece of engineering from an engineering driven company. Interior hands down the best place to be out of the 3, interior is bound to be the best too. Exterior design is on part with that of the interior, exudes sportiness and solidity. Dynamics is a huge grey area, being that I haven't driven the car, yet, and won't be able to for another year. Going by the latest reviews it seems to be a mixed bag of mostly "good". The A4 is fairly good value, you can pretty much build the car to your spec without breaking the bank.

The rankings:

1 - A4
2 - 3er
3- C-klasse
 
You honestly believe that Audi can't make a car as fast as the CSL M3?:t-crazy2:

Its not what they can or cant, its what they have built. BMW can build a mid-engine car that can be faster than a Audi R8 if they want too but they haven't built it.
 
Thanks!

Though I would hardly say the 3-er has exceptional build quality :eusa_thin
It's good but nor exceptional and certainly not class leading.

Is there a full review?

Australia's Wheels Magazine also quotes that the BMW 3 series has the best interior build quality of the three (old A4, new C class) and the best materials so it can't be that out of the equation because wheels don't usually like BMW's....
 
I think many people get design and quality mixed up. Taste is entirely subjective, so there's no real right or wrong answer.
 
1/ 3er: Well designed, well built and of course the queen of road, if only it came with better styled interior and rear.
2/ Merc & Audi.
 
You honestly believe that Audi can't make a car as fast as the CSL M3?:t-crazy2: Dude maybe your not up on cars as much as you claim! Company's like Buick and Saturn can make a car to achieve the same if not better performance then the M3 CSL, the only question is will people buy it, and is it worth the investment! My point in my previous post was that Audi makes plush cars, not ballbusting, optionless, sportscars my friend. Unlike BMW being forced into a market segment they'd rather not play in at this time (M10 to compete with the R8) Audi would never follow in BMW's footsteps with a stipped down, lacking everything Audi's known for in creature comforts car like the CSL. It wouldn't fit Audi's image, or customer base. BMW owners on the other hand aren't overly concerned with having 1st rate interiors, so bare bone versions of there cars fits BMW's image quite well! I believe the E92 M3 CSL will offer the majority of the features and comfort of the standard M3, so you'll see such performance want be obtained this time, do to the lack of weight reduction imho. I said what I had to say, peace!:)

Your comment is somewhat contradictory. I agree that Audi could make a stripped down version that is faster than a CSL, but then you say, they won't make it because they don't feel its necessary. Then you go on saying that BMW are being forced into the supercar market segment to compete with the R8. So whats to say that Audi won't be forced into the lightweight, barebones, go-fast market? Apparantly, Audi will never follow BMW into that market, but as far as I'm concerned, if the market demands its or there is enough interest, then Audi will go into it, just like BMW is (supposedly) going into the supercar market to compete with the R8.

Unless you are the chairman of the board of directors of Audi... or the owner... I don't think you can make a statement like that. Fact is that you or I will never know what the world market demands now or in the future. If you make such a statement, then you'll look the fool when the stripped down RS model comes out - just like those BMW fanboys who criticized turbo engines back in the day.

By the way, using your argument that Audi could do anything that BMW could do, BMW could create a plusher better car than the A8/S8/A6 or whatever than Audi if they wanted too.

Next, BMW and Audi's customer base are coming closer and closer with each and every model. Why? because Audi has openly admitted they are following BMW in creating more sporty, driver-focussed models, because apparantly thats where the market is at the moment. Example evidence for this:
(1) Rear-wheel biased 4 wheel drive,
(2) RS-Quattro GmBH poaching M engineers and BMW poaching them back
(3) More sporty models as of late.
(you get the point).
I wouldn't be surprised if a stripped down model, potentially even a special edition to promote their success in DTM etc, would be presented in future, thereby negating your argument altogether.

Finally, I near the end of your argument with the conclusion that you think that: "Audi do not do stripped down models because they want plushness and sportiness and that suits their philosophy, whereas BMW do stripped down models because their philosophy puts sportiness infront of plushness". Fair point and I can agree with this. But then you go and negate your entire argument by saying "The M3 CSL will have all the plushness of a M3, so there won't be any much difference between the M3 CSL and the M3 in terms of performance". So now your saying that there isn't a market for a stripped down version at all? Or are you simply trying make a fanboy statement that even if BMW create an M3 CSL, it won't beat any Audi RS model in terms of track times etc?

So in light of your comment made to Sunny:
Dude maybe your not up on cars as much as you claim!
I will be so bold as to say "Dude maybe your not up on the car industry as much as you claim!".
 
Your comment is somewhat contradictory. I agree that Audi could make a stripped down version that is faster than a CSL, but then you say, they won't make it because they don't feel its necessary. Then you go on saying that BMW are being forced into the supercar market segment to compete with the R8. So whats to say that Audi won't be forced into the lightweight, barebones, go-fast market? Apparantly, Audi will never follow BMW into that market, but as far as I'm concerned, if the market demands its or there is enough interest, then Audi will go into it, just like BMW is (supposedly) going into the supercar market to compete with the R8.

Unless you are the chairman of the board of directors of Audi... or the owner... I don't think you can make a statement like that. Fact is that you or I will never know what the world market demands now or in the future. If you make such a statement, then you'll look the fool when the stripped down RS model comes out - just like those BMW fanboys who criticized turbo engines back in the day.

By the way, using your argument that Audi could do anything that BMW could do, BMW could create a plusher better car than the A8/S8/A6 or whatever than Audi if they wanted too.

Next, BMW and Audi's customer base are coming closer and closer with each and every model. Why? because Audi has openly admitted they are following BMW in creating more sporty, driver-focussed models, because apparantly thats where the market is at the moment. Example evidence for this:
(1) Rear-wheel biased 4 wheel drive,
(2) RS-Quattro GmBH poaching M engineers and BMW poaching them back
(3) More sporty models as of late.
(you get the point).
I wouldn't be surprised if a stripped down model, potentially even a special edition to promote their success in DTM etc, would be presented in future, thereby negating your argument altogether.

Finally, I near the end of your argument with the conclusion that you think that: "Audi do not do stripped down models because they want plushness and sportiness and that suits their philosophy, whereas BMW do stripped down models because their philosophy puts sportiness infront of plushness". Fair point and I can agree with this. But then you go and negate your entire argument by saying "The M3 CSL will have all the plushness of a M3, so there won't be any much difference between the M3 CSL and the M3 in terms of performance". So now your saying that there isn't a market for a stripped down version at all? Or are you simply trying make a fanboy statement that even if BMW create an M3 CSL, it won't beat any Audi RS model in terms of track times etc?

So in light of your comment made to Sunny:

I will be so bold as to say "Dude maybe your not up on the car industry as much as you claim!".

What's up with the book report? For all you said your still not grasping what I previously posted!

Listen Gene, I merely was pointing out that the performance of the E92 CSL M3 and the standard M3 will be pretty simular, unlike the dramatic performance difference between the E46 CSL and the standard E46 M3 ok? The E46 CSL M3 lacked alot of creature comforts that will be offered this time around!

Secondly when I said that the CSL would be plush, I meant by BMW's standards. Sorry, I should of made that clear from the start!:t-hands:

In regards to your comment about BMW making better interiors then Audi if they want, I agree with you, but considering BMW's selling like hot cakes, I just don't see the motivation for them to make the investment!


Another thing Gene, unless BMW created all that pointless non-sense you posted about rear bias AWD, and what ever else you felt like throwing in there, I fail to see the point in your post! I guess your unaware of the whole R8,911 rivalary huh? I'd credit Porsche for making Audi decide to make sportier, rear bias vehicles!

I've come to see from your post you honestly believe BMW deserves credit for all things!! You'll find a few members here who will agree with you but not many!

At the end of the day this discussing with you has been a big waste of time! I still believe Audi has no intent on making stripped down versions of there cars to compete with BMW's M3 CSL. If you believe I need to be chairman of the board to form an opinion on Audi's character well your entitled to your opinion, even though you feel I'm not!;)

Before I forget, congrats to the R8 Performance Car Of The Year!:eusa_clap :eusa_clap :eusa_clap :eusa_clap
 
Apparantly you thought I wrote a book report. If thats a book report then some people have real issues with regard to their attention spans. That, or you wrote some really crap book reports at school. But alas, let me summarise what has happened in the two initial posts.

You said: "Audi can destroy any E92 M3 CSL if they wanted too, but they don't want too. Besides the M3 CSL isn't going to be that quick anyway".

Typical fanboy bullshit.

I said: "Any company can destroy any other company at making a car of a particular genre if they wanted too. If people will buy it, they will make it".

I can summarise further if you consider that an essay.
 
^ No shit. I am sure Hyundai could make a car with a better interior than Audi if they wanted to, but they don't - it is not what some one can do, it is what they actually do that counts.
 
Yeah, that's true. Perhaps it's because we've already talked about the "A4 vs 3er vs C-Class" thing a thousand times before and now, we have nothing left to say. :eusa_doh: :D

That's true, we've all come to this conclusion.

No matter what Richboy will only choose the Audi.
No matter what Artist will only choose the MB.
So, who wants to take the BMW fanboy crown?


I kid, I kid.:D We already know that people will only choose what they want. LOL
 
^wow so you see me as the ultimate MB fanboy.. im flatterd..

PS
kinda sucks that you cant find a BMW fanboy..
hold on there are to many.. haha:D
 

Latest posts


Back
Top