Yes indeed. It is one of those things that you can sometimes get away with.In other words, racing incident and nothing spectacular and conspiracy ridden.![]()

many surprises but very disappointing moments was the Raikkonen pass from 4-th to 3-d
, he should be penalised at least with drive thought penalty during a race or 10 sec penalty after race which would put him on 4-th position 1-th place for Fisi and podium for Kubica. IMO FIA has silent agreement with Ferrari as it was before. One more no action taken favour for Ferrari. Thank you FIA and F1. 
Kimi's strategy for the first corner is clearly questionable as the gained a significant advantage from using the run off area for what it isn't intended for. One can clearly see that he has no interest in trailing the rest of the pact through the corner but instead went off track and slingshoted to then press the KERS button which evidently took him smoothly past two cars.
A very clear and aggressive strategy, though very much outside the rule book and given last year's row over Hamilton cutting the chicane, I'm stunned that the Stewards didn't even raise their eye brow over Kimi's first corner tactics.
I think this conspiracy is B*.
A wider twisty-er line with dust does not offer an advantage.
The advantage was KERS, but, there's nothing illegal about that; and don't give "it's artificial" crap cause the old turbo boost worked the same way, the DI 54-55 Mercs had an extra 80 or horses au naturel, and MBs from 37 with their SC I8 cars had up to 200 - 300 extra horses on some of the other cars.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.